similar to: [LLVMdev] Not able to run pass

attaching screenshot of errors I got On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Prashanth Sharma <cs13m1017 at iith.ac.in> wrote: > sir, > that I already applied this.As I followed these steps:-please tell me > whered did i go wrong? > > 1. Checkout LLVM: > - cd LLVM > - svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm > 2. Checkout Clang: >

sir, I am able to generate .bc file for other normal code but my problem how to run the pass source code. If I write some pass then how should I run that pass? so please if you can help me in this and thanks for your reply. On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Alexander Musman < alexander.musman at gmail.com> wrote: > You are trying to use the pass source code to generate .bc file, it

Let's take Hello.cpp pass file from llvm/lib/Transform/Hello. Now I want to run clang -emit-llvm -c Hello.cpp(Hello.c).Means I want to apply this pass on itself.Then there are too many errors. On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:27 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 6/14/14, 6:02 AM, Prashanth Sharma wrote: > > Hi, > I applied some pass i.e. Hello pass on

Hi, I applied some pass i.e. Hello pass on Hello.cpp(the pass file).It doesnot work as using command clang -emit-llvm -c Hello.c(Hell.cpp) does not create any .bc file .Can any body have some suggestion ? -- Thanks Prashant Sharma -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Sir, your answer put me in starting situation.As I told I am not able to generate .bc file of hello.cpp(the pass file) as it is giving errors when I use clang -emit-llvm -c hello.cpp -o hello.bc.So please if you can help me. Thanks On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > On 5 June 2014 10:12, Prashanth Sharma <cs13m1017 at iith.ac.in> wrote:

Hi all, When I try to add CURL code to file channel.c we get an error - undefined reference to curl_easy_init. I've added #include <curl/curl.h> so the code compiles fine. this error is generated by the linker, even though func_curl.c is compiled and linked with no errors My asterisk machine have curl and curl-devel 7.12 installed. Asterisk version i am using is 1.4.17. Any help will

Hi, I am new to asterisk configuration. I want to get called number in features.conf. I am defining a feature in features.conf and that feature got executed on pressing a particular DTMF key sequence. As I want to execute my own application on pressing that key which will use called number. testfeature => 3,peer,AGI,StoreNumber|<CalledNumber> Here I want to use called number in place

Hi all, I'm a 3rd year CSE B.Tech student and have been studying LLVM since the past year. I have written a pass for doing register allocation as part of my course project and have also been studying LLVM code sections related to SSA construction, dominance frontiers,etc. I also made some contributions to the Polly project. Currently I am interested in improving the existing alias analysis

It's a problem in the OpenMP specification. The authors (including some from Intel) intended that the OpenMP simd construct assert no lexically backward dependences exist, but as you say, it's not obvious from the spec. One of our OpenMP community members is going to bring up the ambiguity with the OpenMP committee. - Arch -----Original Message----- From: Humphreys, Jonathan

More precisely, for a simd loop, if the safelen(VL) clause is specified, there should have no loop-carried lexical backward data dependency within the specified safe vector length VL. We will make this clear in the OpenMP 4.1 spec. Xinmin Tian (Intel) -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Hal Finkel Sent:

> Sorry for coming to the discussion so late. I have a couple of questions/comments: Actually, you're note is timely, because I'm planning to send out a patch (as soon as I update LangRef and rerun tests) that supports safelen but *not* lexical dependences. I don't need the safelen for Julia, but having done the work and seeing that OpenMP needs it, feel that I should finish the

On 8/8/19 2:03 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: Hi, First, as a high-level note, you posted a link to a Google doc, and at the end of the Google doc, you have a list of questions that you'd like answered. In the future, please put the questions directly in the email. For one thing, more people will read your email than will open your Google doc. Second, having the questions in the email should allow a

Hello all, We are students from Indian Institute of Technology(IIT), Hyderabad, we would like to propose the addition of the following pragmas in LLVM that aide in (or possibly increase the scope of) vectorization in LLVM (in comparison with other compilers). 1. ivdep 2. Nontemporal 3. [no]vecremainder 4. [no]mask_readwrite 5. [un]aligned Could you please

Starting from May-June, we at "Compiler Tree" would start porting clang compiler to use MLIR as middle end target. If someone has already started a similar effort we would love to collaborate with them. If someone would like to work with us, we are ready to form a group and collaborate. If there are sharing opportunities from Fortran side, we would like to consider the same. We are

> There is a fundamental problem with the way that ivdep is defined by Intel's current documentation, at least for C/C++. As you note in your Google doc, it essentially says that the optimizer may ignore loop-carried dependencies except for those dependencies it can definitely prove are present. These are not semantics that any other compiler can actually replicate, and is not equivalent to

Hi Prashanth, On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:22 AM Prashanth N R via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Starting from May-June, we at "Compiler Tree" would start porting clang compiler to use MLIR as middle end target. If someone has already started a similar effort we would love to collaborate with them. If someone would like to work with us, we are ready to

> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > From: "Dangeti Tharun kumar via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Cc: "Santanu Das" <cs15mtech11018 at iith.ac.in <mailto:cs15mtech11018 at

Agreed! Is the code already available? What are your plans for it, and are you interested in collaboration with the rest of the LLVM community? -Chris > On Jan 11, 2020, at 11:58 AM, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, Prashanth, > > That's great news! It sounds like you've made a lot of progress, and I certainly hope that you

Hi, How can we use an array created in Ruby in Java script ? Regards, Prashant -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi Petr- 1. We compile SPEC benchmarks bwaves and xchange currently. We are close to compiling fotonik at this point. 2. We released the source as experimental for the community to take a look. Soon we will open source the entire history of development(we are working on the script to upload the history). thanks, -Prashanth On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:20 AM Petr Penzin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev