similar to: [LLVMdev] Module::getOrInsertFunction determinism

Hi Tim, Thank you very much for quick response. What happens in my case is that mixing calls to getOrInsertFunction with linking another bit code module to the current module seems to be sometimes producing different outputs. Difference might be with the ordering of functions in the file (I¹m looking at LLVM IR representation), with numbers used for constant variables, numbers used in the ³dbg²

Hi Philip, I would like to ask a follow-up question about code generation. Do you know if is expected that if we take the same bit code modules and link them together in the same order (programatically), but on different machines (assuming the same version of LLVM and roughly the same OS), the output may differ with respect to order of function definitions inside module? Thank you very much in

On 05/29/2014 11:06 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Tomek, > >> I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). >> I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit >> code module the new function will be inserted. > Looking at the code (not exhaustively), it seems a new function will > always be added to the end of a module. > >

Hi Philip, Thank you very much for your comments. I think I’ve discovered a root cause. The problem was in linking bit code archive files with the module. At some point, std::set<Module*> is used and iterated over. I believe this was the reason why e.g. It worked consistently with ASLR turned off and produced non-deterministic output otherwise. I changed that bit to use vector instead and

I need to insert a varargs function declaration from within an LLVM pass. getOrInsertFunction() allows an arbitrary list of type parameters for function arguments to be passed in, but as far as I can tell there is no LLVM "type" to represent the variable-length portion of a function argument list. How is this normally done? --Patrick

Hello, I am trying to handle some overloaded functions in the LLVM IR. I have a number of functions named "task" in the source code, differing in the number of parameters. And there is a call, let's say: task (a, b). I get the file.ll equivalent and I want to replace the original call task (a,b) with a call to one of the other functions, task(a,b,c). The problem is that due to

Hi All, I am using code similar to giri instrumentation <https://github.com/liuml07/giri> framework to insert my instrumentation code. It works for normal functions for example to insert recordInt32 function below. void recordInt32(int32_t val){ printf("%d, ", val); } I can get recodedInt32 function in my Module using getOrInsert Function. Function* RecordInt32 =

I am working on a pass in which I need to define and insert a function with variable arguments. Can I do it with the help of getOrInsertFunction()? If not can someone tell me any other method? It will be very helpful if anyone can help. Thanks in advance -- *Akshay Jain * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I have 8 Samba servers with 300 clients here running on Sun and Linux machines with GREAT performance. Now in one departement i installed samba 2.0.6 on one 40K$ IBM F50 with AIX 4.3.2, 2xCPU, 256MB RAM, 100FDX, extern RAID 5 Tower . Performance is really very, very BAD. I tried already everything, but this IBM box with samba is just very SLOW. Browsing through directories, logging, copying

Hello All, I¹ve installed the vanilla shorewall F12, I¹ve got it installed on a couple of other servers with no problems. no matter how I define the zones and interfaces, shorewall logs and allows, rejects or drops only traffic to world. ACCEPT:info net:<myip>/32 $FW icmp Shorewall:world2fw:REJECT:IN=br0 ACCEPT:info world:<myip>/32 $FW icmp

Hello, If you don?t want (Who wants ?) to save roaming profiles under Winnt\Profiles, than you have to change, or create (if not exist) a registry string: Run regedt32.exe and locate the key entry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Microsoft\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon Add (or change) the following string: DeleteRoamingCache Standard value is 0, it has to be 1 All the Best. --

Someone who have mailbox in different directory than indexes, can confirm if doveadm can recreate index (after deleting dovecot.index* files) or these files can be created only by connecting with IMAP client? ?r., 4 gru 2019 o 15:45 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> napisa?(a): > > > > On 4 Dec 2019, at 11.48, Tomek Lutelmowski via dovecot < > dovecot at

I'm encountering a few problems in my migration that I haven't yet figured out. `getOrInsertFunction` is generating a SEGFAULT at FunctionType::isValidArgumentType(llvm::Type*).  I'm calling it as:     generic_ptr_ = llvm::PointerType::get( llvm::Type::getInt8Ty(context), 0 );     f_natural_int = llvm::IntegerType::get(context, 64);     module->getOrInsertFunction(        

> OK - seems you might want to take a few steps back & understand how > C++ code is written/structured generally (and/or take a look at other > parts of the compiler). You'll need a header file with the declaration > of your function & you can include that header file in the > hashtable.cpp and testing.cpp - if that sentence doesn't make sense to > you yet, please

Neither of dovecot.index files are created (.cache, .log, .thread) - these files are created when I open the folder with IMAP client. When mailbox is not used for long time, the indexing takes very long time. So I'm looking for any solution (preferably with doveadm) to manually reindex folders in background. wt., 3 gru 2019 o 20:23 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> napisa?(a):

Hi, I want to insert a function with a void type parameter, for example: int foo(void); OI declared fcall2 = M.getOrInsertFunction("foo", IntegerType::get(M.getContext(), 32), Type::getVoidTy(M.getContext())); then the question is how to get the void type value to make the CallInst inserted sucessfully? (what should be ********) CallInst::Create(fcall2, ******,

I was wondering, if it's possible to set up Samba as a sort of a domain controller for Linux workstations? I'm thinking of benefits like roaming profiles, managing printers etc. Or perhaps for Linux there are better choices than Samba, when it comes to the office / school use (many users, many classrooms, many workstations etc.)? -- Tomek http://wpkg.org

Hello, This post is similar to what I posted yesterday '"smbclient -L host" to list IP addresses - possible?'. I have a PDC in one place and many workstations in different other places connected using WAN/VPN. These workstations have rather changing IPs assigned by DHCP. Sometimes I need to connect to these machines using VNC, for example, connect to machine AC-PC001 to

Hi, I want to perform goodness of fit test for multinominal distribution. The easiest way would be to use Chi2, but the measurment errors are not normally distributed. I thought about using some bootstraping method to perform the analysis. How can I do it in R? Tomek -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hello Everyone! I just want to make sure if such a mess could work for sip channel: In sip.conf: ; register => <some_md5_checksum>@host ; ; [host] hostname=some_address auth=md5 Greets Tomek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050208/169311c6/attachment.htm