similar to: [LLVMdev] Force register allocator to spill all variables of a basic block

Hi Andy and list, Just to give you a follow up, I was implementing a transformation pass just as you recommended at the time I sent the email to the list, but at that time I was worried that the code generator would change the order of the instructions created in the LLVM-IR. Indeed, that was the case. Some instructions after ISel were added between the volatile store instructions (which is

Hi, I'm trying to compile the basicmath benchmark from the MiBench suite to the MIPS target. However, when I call llc with the linked llvm bitcode, the compilation gives an error apparently related to some unsupported feature. The same error occurs when I select -march=arm, but it works for X86. In details: Commands I used to compile basicmath: clang -static -O3 basicmath_small.c rad2deg.c

Hello, I am a new user of LLVM, I wonder if is there a method to force the register allocator to spill vector variables to the stack. Those variables may belong to one or many basic blocks. Best Regards, Raul. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160525/2d6a3e4e/attachment.html>

Given an architecture with two classes of registers: A is general purpose and has an "adequate" number of registers, and C which is special purpose and has very few (e.g. one) register. There are cheap instructions that directly copy from C to A and vice versa. If we need another C register and they are all live, we need to spill one. Currently as far as I can tell, the only way to

Jeff Kunkel <jdkunk3 at gmail.com> writes: > Spiller::Spill( LiveInterval *li, >                           SmallVectorImpl<LiveInterval*> &newIntervals, >                           const SmallVectorImpl<LiveInterval*> &spillIs ); > > has two reference vectors which contain a small list of Live > Intervals. What is the register allocator's job to do

Spiller::Spill( LiveInterval *li, SmallVectorImpl<LiveInterval*> &newIntervals, const SmallVectorImpl<LiveInterval*> &spillIs ); has two reference vectors which contain a small list of Live Intervals. What is the register allocator's job to do with these intervals other than analysis. What more needed other than to know

Hi LLVM, I ran into a case where RegAlloc would insert a spill across instruction that had same register for output operand and implicit-def. The effect this had was that spill code would immediately overwrite the output result. Is this the expected result of setting up MyInst this way? In other words, does RegAlloc know to not insert spill in case it sees that output reg is same as one of

Hi, I have a little doubt about contrib packages. I make some little functions in a R package format, this functions are for my personal use (envelopes for glm models and a plot bar routine). Some friends ask me about the liberation of this functions in a web site, R contrib etc. what is the correct procedure for send a package to R contrib? The functions is not create for me, is adaptaded to R

Hi Brian, +1 on what Nemanja said: specifying large register classes is the key. More details here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137700.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137700.html> Cheers, -Quentin > On Sep 9, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On PowerPC, we

I have encountered a rather odd situation with Greedy where it will end up spilling a register that was populated with a zero (with a trivially rematerializable load-immediate instruction). In fact, it spills 3 such values (LICM moves stuff out of a loop, register coalescer replaces copies with load-immediates and then Greedy spills them). I personally can't think of a situation where a spill

Hi, I have the graph below: | 422 | 1 321 | 1 | 1 |32 1 |23 |_______________________ The numbers are points in coordinates (simplified graph). I need make a cluster analysis of this for identify groups and make a graph with this groups under circle. In R exist several packages for cluster analysis, but, which the package for this analysis and

Hi all, What does (T) mean on the output of "iax2 show peers"? The following my output. darkstar*CLI> iax2 show peers Name/Username Host Mask Port Status ronaldo (Unspecified) (D) 255.255.255.255 0 UNKNOWN sp/ata 201.26.67.102 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 (T) UNKNOWN 2 iax2 peers [0

I'm debugging my iterated coalescing implementation and I've come across what I think is an inconsistency in spill code interval generation. The bug shows up when there's a copy that has its source register spilled. When the coalescer comes back around to try to coalesce the copy, the merge code complains that there are no values copied from the RHS. For example: Examining copy

Hi Quentin, MyInst is a custom instruction that has implicit-defs of fixed registers. The implicit-defs are seen at the end of Instruction Selection. I'd like to add a report, but I am working on an out-of-tree backend based on 7.0. I can try to help reduce the testcase down. Filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41790 Regards, Kevin On 2019-05-07 3:45 p.m., Quentin Colombet wrote:

I do have a reproducer, but it's not for the faint of heart :) This is from a large and messy C file (Perlbench's regexec.c), reduced by bugpoint down to 1050 lines of IR. Perhaps I can paste it on pastebin. Just for fun, I added some debug dumps for machine instructions that spill registers (i.e. return non-zero from MachineInstr::getFoldedSpillSize()) that are fed by load-immediates and

Hi Sanjay, I observed some extra register spills when applying the reassociation pass on spec2006 benchmarks and I would like to listen to your advice. For example, function get_new_point_on_quad() of tria_boundary.cc in spec2006/dealII has a sequences of code like this . X=a+b . Y=X+c . Z=Y+d . There are many other instructions between these float adds. The reassociation

Hi, I have a very simple doubt. Look: > teste <- c("A","B","C") > teste2 <- paste(teste[1],teste[2],teste[3],sep="+") > teste2 [1] "A+B+C" > How to make it automatic, like I try to use paste(teste,sep="+") but the paste dont get the teste elements separately to join again in a unique element. Exist any

This conflict is with many optimizations incl. copy prop, coalescing, hoisting etc. Each could increase register pressure and with similar impact. Attempts to control the register pressure locally (within an optimization pass) tend to get hard to tune and maintain. Would it be a better way to describe eg in metadata how to undo an optimization? Optimizations that attempt to reduce pressure like

[Splitting this out from the original thread to reduce noise in it] On 17.06.2013, at 18:43, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 17.06.2013, at 15:56, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2013-06-15 16:39 ,

Hi, I have a question related to pre-RA scheduling and spill of registers. I'm writing a backend for two operands instructions set, so FPU operations result have implicit destination. For example, the result of FMUL_A_oo is implicitly the register FA_ROUTMUL. I have defined FPUaROUTMULRegisterClass containing only FA_ROUTMUL. During the instruction lowering, in order to avoid frequent spill