similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4.2 Release Plan - Testers Needed

i Don't know if others have raised this issue, but I'm seeing *a lot* of llvm-dev emails and cfe emails landing in my spam folder in gmail. Are other people having this problem? On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have > been two issues identified in

Hi Tom, When running the test script, I got an error message: $ ./test-release.sh -no-64bit -release 3.4.2 -rc 1 -triple armv7a-linux-gnueabihf -j2 # Validating llvm SVN URL llvm 3.4.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist! Do I need to get another test-release.sh script? This is the one from release_34 branch we used to release 3.4.1. cheers, --renato On 16 May 2014 22:55, Tom Stellard

On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >> On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The release_70 branch is ready for the 7.1.0 release. I have updated the

On 12/05/2014 17:12, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:17:05PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 12/05/2014 16:13, Tom Stellard wrote: >>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>> On 12/05/2014 15:22, Tom Stellard wrote: >>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:

On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > > On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via

On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:09 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 10:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > > > On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >

On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The release_70 branch is ready for the 7.1.0 release. I have updated the >> version and pushed a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427, >> which is the only bug we will be fixing in this release. >> >>

Hi, I have just tagged the first release candidate for the 3.4.1 release, so testers may begin testing. Please refer to http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html for information on how to validate a release. If you have any questions or need something clarified, just email the list. For the 3.4.1 release we want to compare test results against 3.4-final. I have added support to the

On 12/05/2014 16:13, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 12/05/2014 15:22, Tom Stellard wrote: >>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> With the release of 3.4.1, the LLVM library has been renamed from >>>> libLLVM-3.4.so to

Hi, I would like to try again to do stable releases for LLVM 3.4. Even though we were unsuccessful with stable releases for LLVM 3.3, I learned some things going through the process, which I think will increase the chance for success with LLVM 3.4. So, here is my TODO list for a successful 3.4.1 release: 1. Get volunteers to help This is probably the most important thing on this list. Stable

Hello, With the release of 3.4.1, the LLVM library has been renamed from libLLVM-3.4.so to libLLVM-3.4.1.so. In parallel, the soname has been updated to reflect this change. AFAIK, we kept the ABI compatible from 3.4 to 3.4.1. So, is there any reason for doing it? This caused some breakages in Debian (basically, breaking some X because of mesa could not link against LLVM due to the new soname).

On 12/05/2014 15:22, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Hello, >> >> With the release of 3.4.1, the LLVM library has been renamed from >> libLLVM-3.4.so to libLLVM-3.4.1.so. In parallel, the soname has been >> updated to >> reflect this change. >> >> AFAIK, we kept the ABI compatible from 3.4

Hi, The release_70 branch is ready for the 7.1.0 release. I have updated the version and pushed a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427, which is the only bug we will be fixing in this release. Since this is an ABI breaking changing and also we are introducing a minor version for the first time, please take some time to test the branch and make sure everything works as expected.

On 20 January 2014 15:44, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Here is a summary of the responses. > These items are still up for discussion, but if there are no > objections in the next few days, I will add these to the > release documentation: > Hi Tom, Thanks for the summary, I agree with mostly everything, but I have some specific

Hi, I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin. We can always use more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know. -Tom

Hi, Here is a proposed release schedule for 3.9.1: Nov 21, 2016: Deadline for nominating change to merge to the 3.9 branch Nov 29, 2016: -rc1 Dec 5, 2015: 3.9.1 Release As a reminder, if you would like to request a patch be merged to the 3.9 branch, file a bug at www.llvm.org/bugs with the subject "Merge rxxxxx into the 3.9 branch." and add

On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > Tom, > > > > now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three > > fixes or at least merging them to the 3.4 branch? > > I've pushed the two approved patches to the 3.4 branch, can you > verify that they work with gcc

No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > > I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > be best to reply to the original

I've uploaded clang+llvm-3.5.2-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz and clang+llvm-3.5.2-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz started testing them. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders > Sent: 16 March 2015 15:36 > To: Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Reminder 3.5.2

Hi Tom, On 9 Jun 2014, at 15:36, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Unfortunately, it is too late to get this into 3.4.2. With the 3.5 > release coming soon, I wasn't planning on doing another 3.4 point > release. We are likely to keep the llvm 3.4 port in FreeBSD for a while after 3.5 is released. We've only removed the llvm 3.1 port a couple of months ago. A