similar to: [LLVMdev] vmkit build failure of lots of "undefined reference"

Oups, sorry for the mistake, llcj (not llc:)) is not more maintained! Gaël Le 10 sept. 2014 00:27, "Gaël Thomas" <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Brian, > > So, I confirm, llc is not more maintained. And using vmjc is probably > the good starting point to translate Java bytecode into llvm bitcode. > > However, I think that your hack (changing the way

Hello again Gaël, (et al) More on rekindling work on VMKit! Thank you for your interactions thus far on- and off-list. As you suggested in your VMKit-retirement email (to which I'm attempting to respond), I'm interested in producing a Java-to-LLVM compiler out of VMKit. I'd like to take you up on your offer to help understand the architecture. If I can get the a Java-to-LLVM

Hi. I googled for this thoroughly but couldn''t find any module that actually worked. Is there any good puppet module or manifest for installing Sun JDK? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi everyone, Just getting into Puppet, so please bear with me :D I''m setting up a java module to keep an eye on the java installation on our RHEL machines. Quick background, RHEL ships openjdk, we need to use Oracle instead. I''ve gone ahead and put the latest oracle java6 RPM, * jre-6u45-linux-amd64*, on one of our puppet-managed boxes. Like many distributions, RHEL has a

--- src/filearch.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/filearch.c b/src/filearch.c index 5985b73..cbc8372 100644 --- a/src/filearch.c +++ b/src/filearch.c @@ -56,14 +56,16 @@ cleanup_magic_t_free (void *ptr) # endif COMPILE_REGEXP (re_file_elf, - "ELF.*(MSB|LSB).*(?:executable|shared object|relocatable),

I hit this while testing HMM with nouveau on linux-5.5-rc5. I'm not a lockdep expert but my understanding of this is that an invalidation callback could potentially call kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) which could cause another invalidation and recursively deadlock. Looking at the drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/ layer, I do see a number of places where GFP_KERNEL is used for allocations and I don't see

Hi Maby stupid question :) It possible to have 3 directors (frontend) but without rings ? All directors connect to this same dovecot (backend) - all backad have this same login_trusted_networks -- Maciej Mi?aszewski IQ PL Sp. z o.o. Starszy Administrator Systemowy

Hello, we have a pair of IBM P570 servers running RHEL5.2 kernel 2.6.18-92.el5.ppc64 We have Oracle RAC on ocfs2 storage ocfs2 is 1.4.7-1 for the above kernel (downloaded from oracle oss site) Recently both servers have been crashing with the following error: Assertion failure in journal_dirty_metadata() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:1130: "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0" kernel BUG in

$B$3$l$O<+F01~Ez$G$9(B. $B4IM}%"%I%l%9(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B7PM3$G(B Mailman $B$K(B $BAw$C$?%a!<%k%3%^%s%I$KLdBj$,$"$j$^$9(B. $B@5$7$$(B Mailman $B$N(B Email $B%3%^%s%I$N;H$$J}$K$D$$$F$O!$(B"help" $B$r%a!<%k$N7oL>$+K\J8$KF~$l$F(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B$X(B $BAw$C$F2<$5$$!%(B

Hello, I''m testing Btrfs RAID1 feature on 3 disks of ~10GB. Last one is not exactly 10GB (would be too easy). About the test machine, it''s a kvm vm running an up-to-date archlinux with linux 3.7 and btrfs-progs 0.19.20121005. #uname -a Linux seblu-btrfs-1 3.7.0-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Dec 11 15:05:50 CET 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Filesystem was created with : # mkfs.btrfs -L

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:08:25AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:48:53AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while playing with xdp and ebpf, i'm hitting the following: > > > > [ 309.993136] > > ================================================================== > > [ 309.994735] BUG: KASAN:

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:08:25AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:48:53AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while playing with xdp and ebpf, i'm hitting the following: > > > > [ 309.993136] > > ================================================================== > > [ 309.994735] BUG: KASAN:

In the latest Fedora rawhide kernel in the repos, I'm seeing the following oops when mounting xfs. rc2-ish kernels seem to be fine: [ 64.669633] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 64.670008] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:172! [ 64.670008] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 64.670008] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller

In the latest Fedora rawhide kernel in the repos, I'm seeing the following oops when mounting xfs. rc2-ish kernels seem to be fine: [ 64.669633] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 64.670008] kernel BUG at drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:172! [ 64.670008] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 64.670008] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller

Hello, I am creating a domU with Ubuntu12.04, I need to provide dom0''s certain ioports(0xcd0-0xcdb) to domU. I have added *ioports = [ "cd0-cdb" ] *and tried it in the domU, its been not mapped on domU. On host I am using xen-4.2 and tool stack xl. Let me know if I have to add anymore information to config file to grant access to domU

Fixes broken dp on GF119: Call Trace: ? nvkm_dp_train_drive+0x183/0x2c0 [nouveau] nvkm_dp_acquire+0x4f3/0xcd0 [nouveau] nv50_disp_super_2_2+0x5d/0x470 [nouveau] ? nvkm_devinit_pll_set+0xf/0x20 [nouveau] gf119_disp_super+0x19c/0x2f0 [nouveau] process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0 worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0 kthread+0x125/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0 ?

Hi Ming, On 11.11.2014 08:56, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> wrote: > > Known, I'm afraid, Ming is looking into it. Actually I had also tried to reproduce this bug, without success. But today I happened to know how to trigger the bug, by coincidence, during testing other things. Try to run xfstests/generic/034. You'll

Hi Ming, On 11.11.2014 08:56, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> wrote: > > Known, I'm afraid, Ming is looking into it. Actually I had also tried to reproduce this bug, without success. But today I happened to know how to trigger the bug, by coincidence, during testing other things. Try to run xfstests/generic/034. You'll

On 25/07/2018 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:40:12 +0300 > >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> >>> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.

On 25/07/2018 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:40:12 +0300 > >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> >>> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.