similar to: [LLVMdev] clang/lnt buildbot on F20 "lnt: error: no such option: -m" ...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 7:18:48 AM > Subject: Re: Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux > > > Hi Hal, > > > > > > On

Hi, I have recently moved the clang-native-arm-lnt-perf bot from the nt producer to the test-suite producer. It seems to be working fine but it doesn't manage to submit the results to http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun. If you scroll down to the bottom of [1], you can see this error message: 2017-08-28 07:06:32: submitting result to 'http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun' error: lnt server:

Great, good to know it's not just a problem with our bot. Thanks! On 28 August 2017 at 16:24, Chris Matthews <cmatthews5 at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Diana, > > I have seen that issue on some other bots too. I will fix it this week. It is something about how MySQL treats character encodings differently than Postgres. We are checking for the value in the table beforehand, and this

missing-abstract-variable is a recent one I introduced - looking into it. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:39 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > These tests failures go away when I disable static libs aka > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF , with that only 2 regtest failures are left: > > > [ 1314s] FAILED: cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test

Hello, I've setup a VM with default networking (NAT) and this works fine but hosts on my LAN can't get to the VM since it uses NAT. When I try to set network to use MacVTap with either default or bridged I get no networking for the VM. Any hints around this? I would like to have the VM's on the same LAN as my host and other machines. I don't care if the VM host can't reach the

The guest was setup through virt-manager. The machine is not configured much after a F20 install (I believe I didn't change any network things) Here is the network part: <interface type='direct'> <mac address='52:54:00:fe:b0:66'/> <source dev='em1' mode='bridge'/> <target dev='macvtap0'/> <model

(Please put your responses inline rather than top-posting) On 02/12/2014 10:07 AM, John Obaterspok wrote: > Hello, > I've setup a VM with default networking (NAT) and this works fine > but hosts on my LAN can't get to the VM since it uses NAT. > > When I try to set network to use MacVTap with either default or > bridged I get no networking for the

On 02/12/2014 10:07 AM, John Obaterspok wrote: > Hello, > I've setup a VM with default networking (NAT) and this works fine but > hosts on my LAN can't get to the VM since it uses NAT. > > When I try to set network to use MacVTap with either default or > bridged I get no networking for the VM. > Any hints around this? I would like to have the VM's on the same LAN

All my attempts to access a Centos 7 machine from Fedora 20 using x2go have failed with these error messages in /var/log/secure: Nov 17 16:42:08 datium sshd[4175]: Accepted publickey for dad from 127.0.0.1 port 43005 ssh2: RSA c5:d0:02:e7:90:ce:8b:bb:65:b2:78:66:29:8c:c8:15 Nov 17 16:42:08 datium sshd[4175]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user dad by (uid=0) Nov 17

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82843 Priority: medium Bug ID: 82843 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NV96][Regression][Bisected] Failure to resume QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: trevor.davenport

Best R-users, Here’s a newbie question. I have tried to find an answer to this via help and the “ave(x,factor(),FUN=function(y) rank (z,tie=’first’)”-function, but without success. I have a dataframe (~8000 observations, registerdata) with four columns: id, dg1, dg2 and date(YYYY-MM-DD) of interest: id;dg1;dg2;date; 1;F28;;1997-11-04;

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 21:59 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > try adding 'map to guest = Bad User' to smb.conf > > Rowland > IT WORKED!!! THANK YOU. Now the XP machine can see both the f14 and f20 shares. (It was not even necessary to restart nmbd or smbd on the f20 machines.) Now, if I'm not asking for too much, can you please explain why this worked. :-) Many thanks

Marc, et al, Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. Summary of problem: 1) XP sees samba shares on fedora14/samba3 machine, but not on fedora20/samba4 machines. 2) all fedora machines see all shares including on XP machine. 3) clicking on f20 machine from XP tries to log in rather than showing the shares. Login is not successful. 4) all machines can ping each

I'm close to making this work. The goal is to make this Fedora 20 system pretend to be a Windows member server in my Windows 2008R2 Active Directory domain and then I'll use it as a backup target. When I run ADUC from my domain controller, I see my F20 system named nfsa. But from Windows, when I do Start...\\nfsa, I get an Access Denied error and it prompts for credentials. When I do

Pido ayuda para calcular el SALDO *DATAFRAME:* ASIENTO FECHA CUENTA CONCEPTO ARS_DEB ARS_HAB SALDO 1 1 2020-01-01 40100006 Asiento de Apertura 0 199517. -199517. 2 231 2020-01-13 40100006 15/01 CH53677071 GALICIA 14054. 0 14054. 3 231 2020-01-13 40100006 20/01 CH22406030 CREDICOO 9458. 0 23511. 4 231 2020-01-13

Hello, A windows XP machine 'X' (the only one left in the LAN) sees all fedora14/samba3 shares on f14 machine 'A' but cannot see fedora20/samba4 shares on machines 'B' or 'C'. 'X' can ping all of the others by name, and all of the others 'A', 'B' and 'C' CAN see ALL of the other shares INCLUDING on the XP machine 'X'.

I posted this on the Fedora users list this morning, where it was suggested I post it here. I'm hoping someone will help me. I know that this is an old and probably worn out topic but I need a quick workable solution before the old server dies, which hopefully won't involve me redesigning everything and having to update 120+ client PCs: Many years ago I built a server on Fedora 8

Hi all, I'm trying to migrate my users to new hardware. They're currently using Samba version 3.4.7-0.50 on Fedora 11 I have a new F20 server set up with Samba version 4.1.14 As you know, F11 had user accounts starting at uid 500 whereas F20 has accounts starting at uid 1000 I've already done usermod -u <NewUID> and groupmod -g <newGID> for the Linux accounts to bump

Hi, I have a task to complete and I'm getting stuck. I can't find anything comparable in the documentation. The shortest explanation I can give is as follows: I need to use double-precision floating point values for floating-point multiplies. I'll not go into why: That would take the discussion away from the essential problem. E.g. Replace: fmuls %f20,%f21,%f8 with the

My question is this: If you have an ongoing blockcopy (drive-mirror) of a running transient VM, and the VM kernel panics, can you restart the VM without interrupting the ongoing blockcopy? A virsh reboot won't work since if the VM is kernel panicked, its not going to respond to ACPI requests.