similar to: [LLVMdev] __builtin___clear_cache

On 14 March 2014 16:34, JF Bastien <jfb at google.com> wrote: > How does this overlap with: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140310/thread.html#208333 The builtin was created to call __clear_cache() on platforms that need it (like ARM and MIPS), but to be ignored on others (like x86_64). This builtin should call __clear_cache() from whatever

Hi, What is the reason for excluding clear_cache.c from ARM builds of compiler_rt? Where __clear_cache is defined in that case? Thanks, Damjan

projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/clear_cache.c I suggest two small changes here. 1. Mark it however required to avoid inlining, i.e. for the x86/amd64 case. Control transfer is required. I realize it is likely anyway, you aren't likely to "fall from" the caller into the code. 2. #elif defined(_WIN32) && (defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)) be changed to just: #elif

builtins/clear_cache.c depends on kernel headers. It's difficult to ascertain whether it's mixing with libc headers but if it is then that's a bug in its own right. Either way, it's pulling in kernel headers for a single #defined constant that's been part of the linux ABI for years now. This makes it more difficult to cross compile for, in my opinion, no good reason. So

Hello, I wanted to make sure that my boot slowdown was related to space_cache so I rebooted the PC several times and it did become slower again. What is more, it doesn''t seem like I even need to generate any actual IO traffic to trigger this. I thought I might give clear_cache a shot again and to test the boot speed with nospace_cache as well. After first booting with

Hi all I received the following patch for compiling ctypes module for Python on FreeBSD from Keith White (I'm in no position to judge this fix, I'm just passing it on). Is there anyone on this list being able to commit this code? Thxs, Werner =================================================================== --- contrib/compiler-rt/lib/clear_cache.c (revision 250739) +++

Rename no_space_cache option to nospace_cache to be more consistent with the rest, where the simple prefix ''no'' is used to negate an option. The option has been introduced during the -rc1 cycle and there are has not been widely used, so it''s safe. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

I''m trying to figure out how to clear the for a worker from my controller. In my aysnc_xxx process I set cache[key]. However, I don''t see an easy way to clear the cache from a controller with invoking something on the worker. What I was looking for was something like MiddleMan(:worker_name, :worker_key_name).cache[key]= Is there something like that and I''m just

Dear list members, When I tried to recover my partition from the space cache bug (see http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg24360.html ), I issued the command `mount -o clear_cache -t btrfs /dev/sda7 /aaa/aaa`. After 10 minutes the mount command segfaulted. I cloned the latest btrfs-progs from Josef''s Github account and ran the `btrfsck --repair` twice on the

Dear list members, Yesterday I was about to restart my computer and that''s why I closed every opened applications: three Eclipse instances, two other Java applications, 2 web browsers etc. It involved a lot of IO operations and before everything could settle down my system became unresponsive. I mean X & co. worked fine, but anything related to IO (opening a new screen, a new

We use Informix database. I was able to connect to the database with S-PLUS by using its CONNECT/Java through the JDBC driver. How can I connect to Informix with R, wither using JDBC or any other method? we run Linux so I prefer a method other than ODBC. Thankx for the help

So when I added the clear_cache option I screwed up and took the break out of the space_cache case statement, so whenever you mount with space_cache you also get clear_cache, which does you no good if you say set space_cache in fstab so it always gets set. This patch adds the break back in properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 1 + 1

Hi everyone, We seem to have allowed our documented target-independent intrinsics to acquire a somewhat-haphazard naming system, and I think we should standardize on one convention. All of the intrinsics have 'llvm.' as a prefix, and some also have some additional prefix 'llvm.dbg.', 'llvm.eh.', 'llvm.experimental.', etc., but after that we lose consistency. When

Hello All, Please forgive the lack of understanding as of yet but I have been trying to follow the mailing list messages over the last few days and would like to know if someone could wither point me into the right direction or possibly give me a brief overview of the complete process. Basically, I see that the Asterisk PBX systems can run on linux and seems to offer the engine base that is

I have been having a problem with my Samba server for about a month now and need help. I am having users mysteriously losing access to drives during the day. The drive will un-map itself and any further attempt to access it through wither Windows Explorer or just typing the UNC in the "Run" window will result in a "Drive or path not accessible" error. On the samba side,

I have been unable to get rattle to run in my new Windows7-64 bit configuration. For wither Rgtk2 or rattle, I get an error: Entry point not found The procedure entry point g_assetion_message_expr could not be located in the dynamic link library libglib-2.0-0.dll. Any help is really appreciated.

Hi list, I have a VPN mesh with ~10 nodes. A recently added node experience the 'Received UDP packet from unknown source' problem. I read in the faq this is probably caused by a NAT rule on wither side, but I dont have such rules. The thing is that IP in the 'Received UDP packet from unknown source ' message is exactly what I have configured. The problem solves itself with

Seriously, I realize the below post doesn't have all the necessary info to diagnose the problem, but I'm not even sure where to look for more info. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ===================================== I have been having a problem with my Samba server for about a month now and need help. I am having users mysteriously losing access to drives during the day.

Hi, I am using rsync to keep two directores on two servers in sync. Machine A, the "client" is the one where the rsync process is invoked, which then logs into Machine B, the "server" as root with ssh and a key. The key is restricted in /root/.ssh/authorized_keys to a script that checks wither $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND matches the rsync --server command that I expect, such as, for

We create two subvolumes (meego_root and meego_home) in btrfs root directory. And set meego_root as default mount subvolume. After we remount btrfs, meego_root is mounted to top directory by default. Then when we try to mount meego_home (subvol=meego_home) to a subdirectory, it failed. The problem is when default mount subvolume is set to meego_root, we search meego_home in meego_root but can not