similar to: [LLVMdev] [polly] adding a polly build-bot running on windows

Hi Tobi, I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for existing bots I might not be aware of. Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new ones? Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users of the builder. The plan would be have linux and windows cmake

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018, at 07:22, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > As for the main motivation on why to import the entire source of isl at all: > > Polly interacts relative tightly with isl which provide the main > > optimization algorithms. For instance, Polly's

> On Jan 15, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > As for the main motivation on why to import the entire source of isl at all: > Polly interacts relative tightly with isl which provide the main > optimization algorithms. For instance, Polly's regression tests > compare the string output of set representation, which

Tobias, Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4? Index: CMakeLists.txt =================================================================== --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142) +++ CMakeLists.txt (working copy) @@ -81,9 +81,14 @@ set(CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_MODULE_PAT FIND_PACKAGE(Isl REQUIRED) FIND_PACKAGE(Gmp REQUIRED) -FIND_PACKAGE(Cloog) FIND_PACKAGE(Pluto)

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Tobias, >> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4? >> >> Index: CMakeLists.txt >> =================================================================== >> --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142) >> +++ CMakeLists.txt (working

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:47 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL > >>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and > >>> use ISL's ILP to solve it. > >> > >> isl

On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> ... >>>> Does attached patch work for you? >>>> >>>> Tobi >>>> >>> >>> Tobi,

On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Tobias, >>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4? >>> >>> Index: CMakeLists.txt >>> ===================================================================

Tobi, What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated in 3.3? Jack

On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >> use ISL's ILP to solve it. > > isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus > would be on having a core analysis pass carry an LGPL dependency. This is fine for

On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Tobias, > Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4? > > Index: CMakeLists.txt > =================================================================== > --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142) > +++ CMakeLists.txt (working copy) > @@ -81,9 +81,14 @@ set(CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_MODULE_PAT > > FIND_PACKAGE(Isl

On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > ... >> Does attached patch work for you? >> >> Tobi >> > > Tobi, > Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' > without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Thanks for

Hi Tobi, when polly is configured with isl and without cloog, make polly-test does not pass cleanly as there are several testcases that use a pass flag that does not exist in this configuration: -polly-cloog. I was thinking to address this problem by renaming -polly-cloog and -polly-codegen-isl to -polly-codegen and making all these tests using -polly-codegen. Another option is to disable these

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:23:59AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Tobi, > What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing > polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated > in 3.3? > Jack Tobi, Is it even possible to build polly without cloog at the moment or is the presence of the -polly-codegen-isl

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:00:44PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> Tobias, >>>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4? >>>> >>>> Index: CMakeLists.txt

Hi Tobi, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Sebastian Pop wrote: > > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to > > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl. > > I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test > dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing > another patch

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> ... >>> Does attached patch work for you? >>> >>> Tobi >>> >> >> Tobi, >> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make

Hi Tobi, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl. I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing another patch that will adapt most of the current tests to work with

On 02/07/2012 01:17 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:47 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>>>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >>>>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >>>>>

On 02/06/2012 11:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> If you do not want to use polly, you could use ISL >>> http://freecode.com/projects/isl to set up the dependence problem and >>> use ISL's ILP to solve it. >> >> isl is an LGPL project. It is not clear to me what the general consensus >> would be on