similar to: [LLVMdev] GlobalValues appear in their own use lists?

Chris, this is a patch against top-of-tree. Maybe I wrote something wrong in the patch? $ svn info … Last Changed Author: chapuni Last Changed Rev: 203523 Last Changed Date: 2014-03-10 17:34:38 -0700 (Mon, 10 Mar 2014) $ svn diff Index: lib/IR/Verifier.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/IR/Verifier.cpp (revision 203523) +++ lib/IR/Verifier.cpp

Hello If I optimize (opt -std-compile-opts ) the following .ll ; ModuleID = 'call0.ll' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32" target triple = "i386-mingw32" define i32 @t(i32 %a) nounwind { entry: %0 = tail call i32 inttoptr (i32 0 to i32 (i32)*)(i32 %a) nounwind

For LLDB I'm writing a dumb module pass that removes all global variables, by running the following code: bool erased = true; while (erased) { erased = false; for (Module::global_iterator gi = llvm_module.global_begin(), ge = llvm_module.global_end(); gi != ge; ++gi) { GlobalVariable *global_var =

I actually need this feature quite badly in my untyped language compiler: since I support first-class functions, I've made the types of all functions a standard vararg (so I can box them). The implementation crashes when I try to read out the value of gc.result. Hints as to what might be wrong? Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> ---

Hi, The checking about that if this is a terminator that it is at the end of the block has been applied twice (bellow). One is at Verifier::visitInstruction, and the other is at Verifier::visitTerminatorInst. Since visitInstruction is called when visiting each instruction, the checking at visitTerminatorInst seems redundant to me. Did I miss any case? void Verifier::visitInstruction(Instruction

Hello All, In reviewing some code in file 'bsd-cray.c', I found a possible issue where data in the following code may not be properly scrubbed in the case IA_BACKDOOR in function 'cray_setup', which is below: case IA_BACKDOOR: /* XXX: can we memset it to zero here so save some of this */ strlcpy(ue.ue_name, "root",

hi, I have a problem. The R shows that Error in 1/ue : non-numeric argument to binary operator. Here is the code: # simulation of tempered stable processes by compound Poisson approximation tsp<-function(n,e,a,c,lema){ x<-numeric(n) for (i in 1:n){ repeat{ w<-runif(1) v<-runif(1) x<-e*(w^(-1/a)) fex<-function(x1){ if (x1>=e) {a1<-a*(e^(-a))/(x^a-1)}}

Hello. I'm posting this question here, because there seem to be no LLD-specific mailing list. Sorry in advance if this is wrong one. I compile two C source with following command: clang -flto -o %name.bc %name.c LLVM is augmented with my custom pass, which amongst other things create a global with appending linkage: @myvar = appending constant [1 x [1 x i8]*] ... I also have another pass

Hi Victor, this code from the verifier broke the Ada front-end build: const Module* M = CI.getParent()->getParent()->getParent(); Constant *MallocFunc = M->getFunction("malloc"); if (CI.getOperand(0) == MallocFunc) { const PointerType *PTy = PointerType::getUnqual(Type::getInt8Ty(CI.getParent()->getContext())); Assert1(CI.getType() == PTy, "Malloc

Christian, the question for you is towards the end... On 09/10/2015 15:39, Denis V. Lunev wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > index 62cf8c9..15c3c02 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > @@ -23,13 +23,265 @@ > > #include "x86.h" > #include "lapic.h" > +#include "ioapic.h"

Christian, the question for you is towards the end... On 09/10/2015 15:39, Denis V. Lunev wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > index 62cf8c9..15c3c02 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > @@ -23,13 +23,265 @@ > > #include "x86.h" > #include "lapic.h" > +#include "ioapic.h"

Hola a todos. Estoy realizando un gráfico con ggplot2, tal que así p <- ggplot(evolucion.alumnos, aes(x=CURSO, y=value, group=variable)) p + geom_line(aes(color=variable)) + labs(list(x="Curso", y="Alumnado extranjero", colour="Grupos Geopolíticos")) + opts(title='Evolución España') Y mi duda es que no encuentro en la ayuda cómo cambiar el tamaño del

In LiveIntervals::processImplicitDefs() we have this: for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = mri_->use_begin(Reg), UE = mri_->use_end(); UI != UE; ) { MachineOperand &RMO = UI.getOperand(); MachineInstr *RMI = &*UI; ++UI; MachineBasicBlock *RMBB = RMI->getParent(); if (RMBB == MBB) continue; const

Hi, I try to iterate over all uses of a Function with the following code (simplified): for (Value::use_iterator UI = F->use_begin(), UE = F->use_end(); UI != UE; ++UI) { if (CallInst* I = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*UI)) { // do something interesting } } This works on Linux, but on Windows the dyn_cast fails, even though the only use of F in that

Hi, On 11/04/13 06:06, edA-qa mort-ora-y wrote: > I have some exception handling which works fine using the JIT. Now I am > producing object files and linking them, but the exception handling > tables seem to be missing. I call _Unwind_RaiseException and get > _URC_END_OF_STACK as a result. you will get this if no catch clauses match (eg because there are no catch clauses, perhaps

The XPL compiler produced the attached OneOfEach.bc file without error or warning from either LLVM or XPLC. However when I llvm-dis the file, I get: llvm-dis: Failed value look-up for name 'entry' The Bytecode Reader prints this out when it can't find the associated value for the name. Obviously I botched something in the XPL compiler but I would have thought the verified would

Hi all, I have a data set containing variables LOSS, GDP, HPI and UE. (I have attached it in case it is required). Having renamed the variables as l,g,h and u, I wish to run a Lasso Regression with l as the dependent variable and all the other 3 as the independent variables. data=read.table("data.txt", header=T) l=data$LOSS h=data$HPI u=data$UE g=data$GDP matrix=data.frame(l,g,h,u)

This patchset implements the KVM part of the synthetic interrupt controller (synic) which is a building block of the Hyper-V paravirtualized device bus (vmbus). Synic is a lapic extension, which is controlled via MSRs and maintains for each vCPU - 16 synthetic interrupt "lines" (SINT's); each can be configured to trigger a specific interrupt vector optionally with auto-EOI

This patchset implements the KVM part of the synthetic interrupt controller (synic) which is a building block of the Hyper-V paravirtualized device bus (vmbus). Synic is a lapic extension, which is controlled via MSRs and maintains for each vCPU - 16 synthetic interrupt "lines" (SINT's); each can be configured to trigger a specific interrupt vector optionally with auto-EOI

In line 1157 of Verifier.cpp, there is this code: Assert1(!F->isIntrinsic() || (i == 0 && isa<CallInst>(I)), "Cannot take the address of an intrinsic!", &I); This check appears to have a problem with this line: invoke void @llvm.memcpy.i32( i8* %._items.i.i, i8* %._items2.i.i, i32 ptrtoint (i32* getelementptr ([0 x i32]* null, i32 0,