similar to: [LLVMdev] Shouldn't tools and projects in .gitignore go to .gitmodules?

My problem is that the .td and .h files are not shown as sources in the codeblocks (.cbp) output generated by cmake. I’m consuming the .cbp file with Qt Creator - it’s seems to be an otherwise excellent tool for llvm development. It seems that the culprit is llvm_process_sources function in cmake/modules/LLVMProcessSources.cmake. The addition of .td sources and header files is wrapped in the

Brought to you by the "I haven't rebuilt the libguestfs universe in a while" saga -- now with working test suite. Pino Toscano (5): build: remove extra gnulib submodule build: remove extra checks and submodules build: stop using gnulib in test-harness build: remove unused gnulib modules Remove extra entries from podfiles .gitmodules | 3 -- Makefile.am

> > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:35:01 -0700 > From: David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Coloured output in rspec 1.1.4 > To: rspec-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <175B70FE-B706-4C03-8B20-C5B207268AD6 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > On May 29, 2008,

Brought to you by the "I haven't rebuilt the libguestfs universe in a while" saga. Pino Toscano (5): build: remove extra gnulib submodule build: remove extra checks and submodules build: stop using gnulib in test-harness build: remove unused gnulib modules Remove extra entries from podfiles .gitmodules | 3 -- Makefile.am | 2 - bootstrap

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:38:22PM -0700, Dwayne Fontenot <dwayne.fontenot at att.net> wrote: > Is lib/ supposed to be empty in febootstrap git HEAD? Yes. Run ./autogen.sh to populate it with gnulib stuff. Actually, this may not work too well unless you have gnulib checked out exactly in ../gnulib. I need to ask Jim Meyering nicely if he'll make gnulib into a submodule of

On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on > Windows, like TortoiseSVN? That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? cheers, --renato

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: >> Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on >> Windows, like TortoiseSVN? > > That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? >From my very simple testing,

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 7:05 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 06:22:20PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > Looks like libguestfs build is broken, or not documented properly. > > > > I tried (based on http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-building.1.html): > > Quite possibly, it's early days. One thing you will definitely need

james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> writes: > p.s. The Mercurial subrepositories feature is loads better than git > submodules and it's built into the tool. But never mind that. Just go > with Git and don't look back. Nobody ever got fired for buying from > the market leader. I don't use submodules enough to be a good juge, but my understanding is that Git's

Filter out from the git ls-files output the files we don't care they appeared (gnulib and intltools stuff), and use comm to only show the remaining added files (i.e. files not being distributed). The output of comm is redirected to file and then printed, so we can check it is empty (failing the target if not). --- Makefile.am | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 Summary: Error transferring user and non-user xattr using --fake-super under Linux Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

I have a sub-application project that I had previously converted to edge rails under svn. Originally, vendor/rails was set up with svn:externals so that an svn update at the project''s root would pull the latest trunk along with all the other updates. Since Rails has moved to GiT and depreciated svn I decided to remove the svn:externals reference for vendor/rails and reinstall trunk using

This is really a git question but the problem is with rails using git and others may have come across the problem. I have a branch on my application''s git repository with edge rails as a subproject checked out into vendor/rails. this allows me to keep my application edge-compliant by checking out the branch (which creates the rails folder in vendor), pulling the latest edge rails and

On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > > Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to > git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful > to know what the roadmap is. Me too. I've been catching up on the thread from a couple weeks ago, and I didn't see any clear conclusion. I have some comments about the

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:02 PM Justin Bogner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Justin Lebar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > I would like to (re-)open a discussion on the following specific > question: > > > > Assuming we are moving the llvm project to git, should we > > a) use multiple git repositories, linked

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> The wiki: >> http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux > As of the moment I am writing this email, the current version of the > page you are actually referring to: > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Development&oldid=4419 > > was last edited on

Thanks for the great feedback, everyone! I have tried to incorporate all of the good suggestions, corrections and new information as best I could. Here's an updated version for review. I have some patches to commit and I'm going to try using the process in this document to root out bugs. -Dave -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and

R-devel has been warning for some time about hidden files (in the Unix sense, starting with a period) in source packages. We could get R CMD build and the CRAN incoming scripts to remove these *if* we knew that they were never needed. It seems clear that .Rapp.history .Rhistory .Rbuildindex.xxxxx inst/doc/.build.timestamp are R leftovers, ._.DS_store is from an Apple filesystem and .tex

Lin Ma (5): configure: error out if using libvirt backend and no header files configure: output the default backend in summary configure: try pcre-config if pcre pkg-config file not found configure: output clearer message when missing libmagic configure: support using local gnulib src directory as $GNULIB_SRCDIR bootstrap | 78

Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful to know what the roadmap is. Thanks! -Dave