similar to: [LLVMdev] Build/Install of LLVM without root access

I am using the source distribution, and the first puzzle is that it doesn't seem to match with the installation instructions from svn. E.g., svn talks about llvm, cfe, compiler-rt, etc; however, the source is in many differently named *.tar.gz files: clang-3.4.src.tar.gz libcxx-3.4.src.tar.gz polly-3.4.src.tar.gz clang-tools-extra-3.4.src.tar.gz lld-3.4.src.tar.gz

I must not be asking clearly. I have a machine on which I have placed the tarballs - but no internet access. How do I use the *src.tar.gz files from the llvm 3.4 downloads page? I understand the layout produced by the svn actions, but if I have just the tarballs, do I simply replace "svn co" with "tar -xvzf" in the sequence? How do the names of the tarballs map to the names

I am using gcc 3.4.6 to build LLVM, and am encountering overloaded/ambiguous errors in several files... % gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions

Hi Bryan, On 26 November 2013 20:08, Bryan Ewbank <Bryan.Ewbank at sas.com> wrote: > I am using gcc 3.4.6 to build LLVM, and am encountering overloaded/ambiguous > errors in several files… I can't say anything about your specific errors, but there are definite plans that LLVM 3.4 will require GCC 4.7.x to compile (since it'll use C++11 features). Regardless, 3.4 is ancient.

Folks, I''m trying to figure out whether we should give ZFS / mpxio a shot on one of our research servers, or simply skip it (as we have previously). In Nov 2009 Cindy responded to a thread concerning ZFS device issues, cfgadm, and mpxio: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-November/033496.html I''ve got an x2270 with the Sun EZ-SAS HBA and external SATA

This may seem simple but I've looked all over and come up with nothing. I'm interested in running Icecast 1.3.12 on port 80 to get around the firewall issue. Obviously it's not prudent to run Icecast at root so I'm wondering is there any way to safely run Icecast on port 80 using either setuid or port redirection? Has anyone accomplished this and if so, how'd you do it?

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Tim <tim at tcsac.net> wrote: > Perfect. Which means good ol'' supermicro would come through :) WOHOO! > > AOC-USAS-L8i > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS-L8i.cfm Is this card new? I''m not finding it at the usual places like Newegg, etc. It looks like the LSI SAS3081E-R, but probably at 1/2 the

Greetings, Can anyone relate experience(s) installing CentOS on Compaq rack mount servers units please? Easy no problem, easy some issues, or ghastly do not do it under any circumstances... ;) Basically, I'm looking at some used/refurb dual PIII units and will run RAID on Compaq built in SCSI or is it easy to pop in some 3ware SATA in them? Let me know in terms of CentOS 3 and/or 4 please.

From: Tony Wicks <tonyw at tonyw.com> > I run Centos on Compaq dl380g1/2/3's and Dell servers. While the > Compaqs are strong hardware they are old and frankly the performance > compared to modern (cheap or otherwise) hardware is not really that > impressive. A dual 1 gig P3 dl380 and ultra 3 scsi drives get significantly > out performed by a generic celeron with software

Nick, What are you planning on running over the shared connection? Database, eMail, File Shares? How many users? How much data? What is your I/O profile? I've worked with 'enterprise' storage most of my career either as a consumer, adviser or provider - can't comment on AoE other than to suggest you look at what are the business & technical goals, how they solve it and what

Hello, I''m also seeing this exact same problem. I''ve posted on xen-users, but did not get an answer. Venkat seems to be experiencing the same problem as me. I have the latest BIOS for my motherboard DQ35JO. (BIOS ver 933) I''m running a Q6600 as well. It hangs at "Brought up 4 CPUs." I''ve tried all sorts of combinations of Xen versions and kernels to

Hello, I'm trying to create a pure LLVM toolchain (that will not depend on GNU and produce GNU-free code too) on a musl based distribution. For now, I use gcc to bootstrap and build all LLVM components. I do it individually because I was running out of space and memory trying to build all using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS. Also, I don't want to create a all-in-one package. Then, once

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:40:44PM -0600, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > Might be a helpful exercise for you to try building vanilla clang with > runtimes for the host, before worrying about how to build everything for > your baremetal case: > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary So I did. :o) It was fun realizing how much Release type reduces LD

Colleagues - I am trying to write a rather complex maximum likelihood program. One of the complexities is that I want to create a program that can accept user-written routines to calculate likelihood values from different types of data. The program uses several functions I have written. First there is a main function that reads in what kind of data will be used. It then calls OPTIM.

And again... LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON This one is the good one... maybe. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Alexandre Isoard < alexandre.isoard at gmail.com> wrote: > That is because I mistyped it: > LLVM_ENABLE_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON > LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com>

This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html January 7, 2009 Data Analysts Captivated by R?s Power By ASHLEE VANCE To some people R is just the 18th letter of the alphabet. To others, it?s the rating on racy movies, a measure of an attic?s insulation or

On 04/12/2019 06:31 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: > On 04/12/2019 04:28 PM, AiChi via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working on one of my team's project to build LLVM full clang toolchain (Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi) on a CentOS machine. >> >> Previously we compiled our codebase with llvm-toolset-7/clang++, which by default takes stdlibc++

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote: > On 02/26/2014 12:43 PM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > Do you think it makes sense to land my ExternalProject_Add patch > > so that others can experiment with it? I can add quit with a > > fatal_error/warning if the build tree rules are generated with Ninja. > > Since it is conditional on

What is the purpose of supporting this "copy directories around" sort of build strategy anyway? At the end of the day, the way these packages get installed is via system package managers is independently, each project finding its dependencies with the standard prefix path. When I compile from source it's always like this: $ cd llvm-6.0.0rc2.src/ $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake ..

Dear Help: I have a recent version of Red Hat(Version 6) Linux (One Year Old). When I tried to invoke the rpm --install I got the following: [root at localhost /root]# rpm --install R-base-1.2.0-3.alpha.rpm only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM error: R-base-1.2.0-3.alpha.rpm cannot be installed What to do? Kirk