Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] http://llvm.org/apt/ with 'old' gcc: Request for comments"
2013 Dec 26
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] http://llvm.org/apt/ with 'old' gcc: Request for comments
After some thinking on this idea, it would not work because I need /
want to use Debian/Ubuntu package to do the build and clang 3.4 is not
built on these architecture :(
So, if I bootstrap clang 3.4, I will have a dependency on libstdc++
4.8... :/
On 25/12/2013 22:23, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> The easiest is probably to have a dependency to (and use)
2015 Sep 05
2
[APT] lldb symbols
Hello.
I have a crash of lldb-3.8 installed for Ubuntu 15.04 from here http://llvm.org/apt/
I want to debug it using gdb by myself but I can't get symbols. Any suggestions on how can I get it?
--
Eugene
2016 Jun 10
5
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi,
I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain.
FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests.
Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link:
cd
2016 Jun 12
2
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running
check-all.
What tests are failing?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing
> two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were
>
2018 Sep 19
5
LLVM 7.0.0 Release
I am pleased to announce that LLVM 7 is now available.
Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#7.0.0
The release contains the work on trunk up to SVN revision 338536 plus
work on the release branch. It is the result of the community's work
over the past six months, including: function multiversioning in Clang
with the 'target' attribute for ELF-based x86/x86_64 targets,
2018 Sep 19
5
LLVM 7.0.0 Release
I am pleased to announce that LLVM 7 is now available.
Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#7.0.0
The release contains the work on trunk up to SVN revision 338536 plus
work on the release branch. It is the result of the community's work
over the past six months, including: function multiversioning in Clang
with the 'target' attribute for ELF-based x86/x86_64 targets,
2012 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Announcing 3.1 Release Branch Date!
Le mardi 27 mars 2012 à 14:36 -0700, Bill Wendling a écrit :
> IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT!
>
[...]
> By the way, we are looking for ARM testers. There was a lot of interest in the 3.0 release for an ARM release. We will try to do one this release on a trial basis. We are looking for ARMv7 cortex-a8 and cortex-a9 on Linux.
If you are interested, I can upload the current trunk
2013 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Some news about apt, QA, Coverity, etc
Hello,
Some news about the various QA and packaging tools.
* Ubuntu Saucy nightly packages are now also available on
http://llvm.org/apt
* All distributions have new packages:
- lldb-3.4-dev - contains the LLDB headers to build software on top of this
- python-clang-3.4 - provides the python / clang bindings
* polly is built again but, for now, only for Debian unstable (I have to
backport
2015 Feb 05
2
[LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] Release Candidate 2 available
On 05/02/2015 18:34, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Source and binaries for LLVM 3.6.0-rc2 are now available at
>> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/
>>
>> Please try them out, run tests, build your favourite projects, and
>> *file bugs* about anything that
2015 Feb 06
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] Release Candidate 2 available
Hi all,
I would really like to get a patch into 3.6 for libc++. The patch
renames template parameters with the names '_A' and '_V' to longer
names. '_A' is frequently defined in ctypes.h and that could cause
libc++ to not compile.
I'm fairly sure the code was added between 3.5 and 3.6 so that would
make this a regression.
The patch can be found here:
2018 Sep 19
3
[lldb-dev] LLVM 7.0.0 Release
Alex,
I have built ubuntu binaries for the last couple of releases. I apologize
-- I haven't built those new binaries yet, I only have uploaded the SLES
ones.
I have an ubuntu 14 tarball that I'll upload today. I will work on getting
ubuntu 16 or 17 next. The dpkg/APT repos might be a good substitute,
though.
Hans, apologies -- I should've asked to hold the 7.0.0 release for
2016 Mar 29
6
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
Hi Sylvestre,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9
> packages are going to be green by next week.
Any updates on that?
It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others
(and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated.
Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,
2018 Jan 08
1
LLVM Social - Paris: January 30th, 2018
The next LLVM social in Paris will happen on January 30th, 2018.
Everyone interested in LLVM, Clang, lldb, Polly, lld, ... is invited to
join.
Event details, including registration (free but mandatory) at
http://www.meetup.com/LLVM-Clang-social
For this meetup, Adrien Guinet, Serge Guelton and Juan Manuel Martinez will
talk about the "Challenges when building an LLVM bitcode
2016 May 09
2
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:
> Le 09/05/2016 à 07:34, Paweł Bylica a écrit :
> > llvm-3.8-dev is broken:
> >
> > CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include):
> > include could not find load file:
> >
> > /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake
> Brad King helped me
2015 Aug 28
7
[3.7 Release] 3.7.0-final has been tagged
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> 3.7.0-rc4 has just been tagged. It is identical to rc3, plus:
>
> - r245902: Revert r245355: change of clang-tools-extra symlink in the
> release script
> - r245947: Merge of r245927: Fix LLDB build on MIPS
> - r245948: Deprecate the DataLayout on the TargetMachine, and backport
> the 3.8 API
2007 Apr 18
3
Problems with the Speex Jitter Buffer
Hi,
I am using the JitterBuffer. Since there is not so much documentation I
think I dont use it in a correct way. All the packets are recieved (I
control the sequence numbers) but the JitterBuffer often tells me he has
no packet. I am using it in the following way:
I am not sure if I use the ticks correctly but I think it can be set to
20(msec).
It is set as a Member in my class and i
2016 Mar 12
0
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit :
>
>
> > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but
> > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary
> > tarballs for Linux with every release at
> https://cmake.org/download/ .
> > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for
2018 Mar 13
4
LLVM Release Schedules: 5.0.2, 6.0.1
Hi,
We don't normally do X.Y.2 releases, but there has been some interest in
getting a 5.0.2 release out with the Spectre mitigations included, so I
am proposing the following schedule for a 5.0.2 release:
LLVM 5.0.2
-rc1 Mon Mar 19
-final Mon Mar 26
To keep things easy for testers, 5.0.2 will be for Spectre related fixes only
and won't be opened up for general bugs.
And here is
2016 Mar 12
4
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit :
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8
> >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it
>
2016 Mar 09
2
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and
> 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need
> more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake)
Hi Sylvestre,
Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are
going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?