similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar"

2013 Dec 20
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar
Thanks Joerg. I've made the change you suggested and verified that it still works. I think the noinline is still required though as this function can be called from a couple of places and gdb will want to set its breakpoint on the single function address. Let me know if you think otherwise though. Cheers, Andrew On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger < joerg at
2013 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:18:46AM +0100, Andrew MacPherson wrote: > This patch forces it to leave the call using the method described here in > the 'noinline' section: Use asm volatile("":::"memory") to make sure that it doesn't leave trackes. The noinline can likely go in that case... Joerg
2014 Jan 15
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar
Hi Rafael, comment explanation added now. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM with a comment explaining the issue. > > On 20 December 2013 03:50, Andrew MacPherson <andrew.macp at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Joerg. > > > > I've made the change you suggested and verified that it
2014 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Don't optimize out GDB JIT registrar
Wouldn't LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_USED be the correct thing here to prevent dead stripping, if that's the problem? On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. Do you have commit access? > > On 15 January 2014 00:27, Andrew MacPherson <andrew.macp at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, comment explanation added now.
2014 Aug 02
5
[LLVMdev] MCJIT debugger registration interface.
Hi All, I'd like to revisit the MCJIT debugger-registration system, as the existing system has a few flaws, some of which are seriously problematic. The 20,000 foot overview of the existing scheme (implemented in llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/GDBRegistrar.cpp and friends), as I understand it, is as follows: We have two symbols in MCJIT that act as fixed points for the debugger to
2014 Aug 10
3
[LLVMdev] MCJIT debugger registration interface.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > I think this ignores the real problem with the MCJIT debugging interface: it doesn't give MCJIT clients any way of directly accessing and parsing the debug metadata. > Parsing the existing debug metadata isn't necessarily a good idea anyhow. It's not a stable format and is quite large. >
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] Stack traces from JIT code
Hi Andy, In the NotifyObjectEmitted method of our derived JITEventListener class we use the begin_symbol() iterator to walk the object's symbols looking for functions and only functions marked with ExternalLinkage seem to show up. I'm not sure how I would access the Dwarf info from within there, is there a way? Thanks, Andrew On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Kaylor, Andrew
2006 Aug 11
3
XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server
Any suggestions to look into, or more debug info required? The box is running centos 4.3 final, up to date with the latest versions of CentOS updates,, it's running something like 3.0.10 or .11 - can't recall. 1:22 am. Off to bed... Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+dmacpherson=mainframe.ca@lists.samba.org
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Stack traces from JIT code
Yeah, take a look at the IntelJITEventListener code (in lib/ExecutionEngine/IntelJITEvents). It uses the debug info to find function names. -Andy From: Andrew MacPherson [mailto:andrew.macp at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:12 PM To: Kaylor, Andrew Cc: Reid Kleckner; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Stack traces from JIT code Hi Andy, In the NotifyObjectEmitted
2007 Mar 08
2
[LLVMdev] Would it be possible to have the LLVM be seen as an arch for the kernel to compile against?
I posted this question on the llvm channel on irc. I am new to all of this. And I only found out about LLVA as a result of the irc. And please forgive my erroneous terminology. So let me try this as best I can. I want to know if the code of LLVA/LLVM can be used as a virtual processor in configuring the linux kernel? Maybe you have already encountered this and possibly accomplished it as
2005 Feb 15
2
Dialplan + Registrar DB
Hi; As you probably know, SER style of handling an incoming call is : 1) try to look-up it from registrar DB 2) if not found there, try to do some thing else Is there any possibility of doing the above at "Asterisk Dial-plan"? Regards Mohammad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2009 Jul 20
0
Changing registrar
Until now, we were tied to Amen (which delegates to Network Solutions), which was not an optimal choice. As of today, I've moved to Gandi, another French registrar, which is a kind of good citizen out there: http://www.gandi.net/whowe/ http://www.gandi.net/supports/ While I've done everything to avoid a disruption during the transfer period, we might still face some issues. If you notice
2009 Jun 24
0
Avaya 4620 SW SIP Config - not setting Proxy/Registrar
I'm using the latest SIP firmware from Avaya. The phone receives the 46xxsettings.txt OK, and then after entering extension and password it goes to the home screen saying 'Registering'. When I check options->ViewIPSettings->IPAddresses on the phone, the registrar and SIP Proxy fields are blank. I have both lines: SET SIPREGISTRAR "67.1XX.XX.XX" and SET
2005 Aug 30
1
Registrar only setup
Hello, I'm having trouble figuring out how to setup Asterisk so that it's only a registrar - not passing any RTP data during phone calls. So far I got this far: Asterisk server holds registration information for phones Phones register with Asterisk giving it their ip+port where they can be currently contacted NAT doesn't seem to be a problem because STUN seems to take care
2014 Mar 25
3
[LLVMdev] Getting the Debugging JIT-ed Code with GDB example to work
I'm trying to run the example described at: http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html I followed the sample command line session (below, with versions numbers for everything), but gdb doesn't stop at the breakpoints as described. Any idea what is wrong? Thanks, Zach zdevito at derp:~/terra/tests$ > ~/clang+llvm-3.4-x86_64-unknown-ubuntu12.04/bin/clang -cc1 -O0 -g >
2009 Feb 20
0
Qualify sip users behind remote registrar
Hi everybody,
2013 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen?
If it's a Windows-only thing the correct tests would be: if (NumBytes >= 4096 && STI.isOSWindows()) { and if (Subtarget->isTargetWindows()) where bool isOSWindows() const { return TargetTriple.isOSWindows(); } Yaron 2013/10/23 Andrew MacPherson <andrew.macp at gmail.com> > Glad that helped! As I understand it __chkstk is always required on > Windows
2013 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] Stack traces from JIT code
We implemented a similar solution for handling crashes in production but one issue we came across with MCJIT was that the NotifyFunctionEmitted call from the old JIT was replaced with NotifyObjectEmitted. The ObjectImage used by NotifyObjectEmitted does have a way of iterating symbols but non-external functions used in the module didn't seem to appear in this list so we were left with some
2009 Jun 24
10
good small registrar?
Greetings, What are some registrars that members of this list have had good experience with? I was stepping through the godaddy checkout process, and being opted-in to a dozen different upsell features just left a bad impression. But I have no clue who else to go with. -Eugene -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 May 17
4
multiple sip accounts from same sip registrar
Dear all, I have an asterisk sip issue which I don't believe is unique. I use a registrar (sipgate.co.uk) where I have 3 different accounts. These accounts provide me with three seperate local phone numbers which allow me to allocate them to seperate users. By using just one of these accounts I can set asterisk up to send and receive calls no problem. However, when I start to introduce an