similar to: [LLVMdev] Please cherry pick r195411 into release-3.4

On 3 January 2013 20:53, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: > All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the > Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the > makefile execution without gutting LNT as well = p. > Hi Michael, The idea was never to gut the makefiles or LNT, but to let all buildbots use LNT to call

On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: > 3. Later phases do broader, longer lasting testing than earlier phases. Thus the 4 phases we currently have are: > > a. Phase 1 (sanity): Phase 1 is a quick non-bootstrapped, non-lto

I think it’s a splendid idea (but you already knew that). On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: > IEEE-754R defines a normal floating point number as: > 2.1.38 normal number: For a particular format, a finite non-zero floating-point number with magnitude greater than or equal to a minimum bemin value, where b is the radix. Normal numbers can

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: ... > I have actually timed said instructions in the past and reproduced Agner > Fog's results. I just prefer to speak by referring to facts that can not be > misconstrued as hearsay = ). That would be great. Also, can you point me to the Agner Fog table that you are referring to? Thanks.

On Nov 15, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Gottesman" <mgottesman at apple.com> >> To: "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:59:18 PM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Code ownership

It seems like there is a consensus that this is a good change. Any nay sayers? Michael On Jun 18, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM (and you've already gotten other positive feedback as well). > > -eric > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: >> IEEE-754R defines a

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Gottesman" <mgottesman at apple.com> > To: "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:59:18 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Code ownership proposal > > I would like to nominate Nadav Rotem for the x86 backend. Michael has indeed been

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com>wrote: > 3. Later phases do broader, longer lasting testing than earlier phases. > Thus the 4 phases we currently have are: > > a. Phase 1 (sanity): Phase 1 is a quick non-bootstrapped, non-lto > compiler build, to check the ``basic sanity'' of the code base and build > process.

LGTM (and you've already gotten other positive feedback as well). -eric On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: > IEEE-754R defines a normal floating point number as: > > 2.1.38 normal number: For a particular format, a finite non-zero > floating-point number with magnitude greater than or equal to a minimum > bemin value,

> It appears that the stats you listed are for movaps [SSE], not vmovaps [AVX]. I would *assume* that vmovaps(m128) is closer to vmovaps(m256), since they are both AVX instructions. Although, yes, I agree that this is not clear from Agner's report. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding. You are misunderstanding [no worries, happens to everyone = )]. The timings I listed were for

I have a set of time-series climate data with missing entries. I need to add rows for these missing entries to this data set. The only way I know to do this is unsing a foreloop, but this won't work on a list. I've tried to convert the list to a data frame, but that won't happen, either. I want to fill rows in this table: > newtest[10:15,] yrmos yearmo snow.sum snow.mean

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby at suse.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/17/2016, 08:28 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> I'd like to recommend backporting this commit: >> >> commit 0a363e85cdafbceeee6a49b91c604d0d4d070dc7 >> Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> >> Date: Thu Jul 23 17:20:12 2015 +0200 >> >>

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:28:13PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to recommend backporting this commit: > > commit 0a363e85cdafbceeee6a49b91c604d0d4d070dc7 > Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jul 23 17:20:12 2015 +0200 > > drm/nouveau/nv46: Change mc subdev oclass from nv44 to nv4c It doesn't apply to

Hi, On 01/17/2016, 08:28 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > I'd like to recommend backporting this commit: > > commit 0a363e85cdafbceeee6a49b91c604d0d4d070dc7 > Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jul 23 17:20:12 2015 +0200 > > drm/nouveau/nv46: Change mc subdev oclass from nv44 to nv4c > > This disables MSI by default on G72 (NV46)

I talked with Majnemer/Mehdi about developing this proposal on github. They said that this was ok (after all we are moving to github). We can add facts to the specific proposal via PRs which we can use to center the discussion. I created a straw man repo and a scaffolding hacked from the swift-evolution process for just this purpose. I hacked some words from jlebar's initial email as just a

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 3 January 2013 20:53, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: >> >> All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the >> Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the >> makefile execution without gutting LNT as well

Hello, I'd like to recommend backporting this commit: commit 0a363e85cdafbceeee6a49b91c604d0d4d070dc7 Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> Date: Thu Jul 23 17:20:12 2015 +0200 drm/nouveau/nv46: Change mc subdev oclass from nv44 to nv4c This disables MSI by default on G72 (NV46) devices where it's apparently a bit buggy. We have a later patch which turns MSI back

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Elior Malul" <elior.malul at intel.com> > To: "Michael Gottesman" <mgottesman at apple.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:33:42 AM > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] SIMD

IEEE-754R defines a normal floating point number as: 2.1.38 normal number: For a particular format, a finite non-zero floating-point number with magnitude greater than or equal to a minimum bemin value, where b is the radix. Normal numbers can use the full precision available in a format. In this standard, zero is neither normal nor subnormal. This implies that a denormal is not a normal number.

I would like to nominate Nadav Rotem for the x86 backend. Michael On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 7:45 AM, "Du Toit, Stefanus" <stefanus.du.toit at intel.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that Michael Liao become the code owner for the x86 backend. >> >> Michael has been