similar to: [LLVMdev] Reporting errors when applying fixups

Matheus, The ARM backend reports these kinds of errors using FatalError method of MCContext. You can see some examples in ARMAsmBackend.cpp (search for "out of range pc-relative fixup value"). -David From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Matheus Almeida Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 5:37 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Rafael, Sure, the expansion of at least .cpload should be done in the Target ELFStreamer but AFAICS it doesn't solve my initial problem. MCCodeGenInfo is not created in tools where CodeGen isn't needed (llvm-mc) and it's still not possible to access the Relocation Model in MCObjectFileInfo from the target streamer (private member). Am I missing something obvious ? There are many

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: >> Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? > It's something we're considering to do and the documents should be available at some point in the [hopefully] not too distant future. > >> then why GCC disagree with

Hi Matheus, Thank you for your information! Do you known where do download MIPS ABI/EABI document? Thanks in advance! -- Best Regards, Yu Rong Tan On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: > An assembler is the tool you're after. [And a linker if you want to have an executable in the end]. > > You can specify -filetype=obj to

Thank you very much for your information and documents! Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? If they thought no much people interested in that doc, they had to make greate effort on compiler like GCC,LLVM by themself,then why GCC disagree with some MIPS ABI, it should be freely designed by MIPS ABI designer and compiler

> So in summary, each step is ABI compatible with the previous step. The linker will ensure that the end-user doesn't try to do the second step before the first step is finished since it will refuse to link a binary that contains both O32 and O32+fp64. It will produce an O32 binary given a combination of O32+fpxx, and similarly a O32+fp64 binary given a combination O32+fpxx and O32+fp64.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: >> There are a lot of MIPS ABIs. > > Yes, and we've discovered that there seem to be incompatible extensions to some of these ABI's too. :) > >> I'm pretty sure Imagination Technologies working up a new abi right now. > > Not exactly. We're not working on any

Some Mips macros (e.g. la[1]) and the handling of Mips directives used for Position-Independent Programming (e.g. .cpload[2]) require access to Reloc::Model from within the Assembly Parser but there doesn't seem to be a way to do it in its current form. 1) Reloc::Model is passed to MCObjectFileInfo but it's a private member of that class 2) TargetMachine is not accessible I can also

Hi, I'm trying to implement a 10-bit relocation that does not start at the beginning of a byte-boundary and I'm not entirely sure I understand the use by some targets of MCFixup.Offset and MCFixupKindInfo.TargetOffset. LLVM's documentation states that: MCFixup.Offset -"/// The byte index of start of the relocation inside the encoded instruction."

Hi, To my understanding, ll/bc can translate to any target machine code that make cross-compiling easy. $llc -march=mipsel -mcpu=mips64 test.ll generate test.s(MIPS ASM) There must be a tool turns test.s to mips ELF file to make this whole thing done completely. What is it? -- Best Regards, Yu Rong Tan

Attached is an example of how to reproduce the issue. It uses a C file that happens to has a bunch of switch statements which are encoded as jump tables, giving us data-in-code. Usage: To build object files with clang via the -integrated-as versus via GCC: $ export NDK_DIR=<my_ndk_dir> $ export LLVM_DIR=<my_llvm_bin_dir> $ make To test that the generated objects contain the same

hail, I have a 7-stable: [matheus@xxx /usr/home/matheus]$ uname -a FreeBSD xxx 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #2: Sun Jul 6 15:03:26 BRT 2008 root@lamneth:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx_7 i386 and there exists three geom things. gconcat status Name Status Components concat/concat0 UP ad4 ad5 gmirror status Name Status Components

I recently updated the samba to latest Debian stable version (3.0.24-2), after that I couldn't see groups on Windows stations anymore, only domain users, and any changes on smb.conf has been made. Currently I'm using Samba along with LDAP in my servers to authenticate users from Windows 9X/2000/XP workstations. I'm a bit clue less about how solve that problem, since with oldest

Hi there, I was looking for cri-o 1.13 package to install on CentOS 7.6 but it seems that we only have 1.11 packaged. There is any alternative to 1.13 package to CenOS 7.6 or if I want to use it I should build from source? Thanks. -- Matheus Eduardo Bonif?cio Morais Analista de Infraestrutura de TI, Plataforma e Aplica??es Confedera??o Sicredi Centro Administrativo Sicredi ? Porto Alegre +55

hail, I write just to make sure its dead. I've lost the first disk on a ZFS pool (jbod). Now I can't mount it with only the second disk. The first disk clicks to death :( [root@optimus ~]# zpool status pool: pool state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Attach the missing

Hello everybody!! I have a big network here with many machines with different operating systems (Linux, Windows 9x/2000/XP and FreeBSD). Currently all of them are authenticated by a Debian GNU/Linux server running SAMBA with LDAP. It works perfectly but I have some problems to block some features from Windows users. I'm looking for some tool to control the user rights around his own station

hail, I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE: FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59 BRT 2008 root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386 where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices, around the first 120GB are gathered in gmirror, and what left is in gstripe. so that's whats going on. if the machine locks, and fsck comes to

Hi everyone. In ARMAsmBackend.cpp, in routine DarwinARMAsmBackend::ApplyFixup() there is a curious call to getFixupKindNumBytes() - which can return 1,2, 3, or 4 depending upon the FixupKind The code in ApplyFixup() seems to be lifted from the X86. AFAIK, the initial Fixup.Offset() is always divisible by 4, at least for ARM mode - i.e. it is always at the instruction boundary. it looks like

New patch taking Eli's comments into account. Olivier. On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Olivier Meurant > <meurant.olivier at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Seems reasonable, but I haven't looked at the code yet. I would >>> suggest trying to split your work up into separate

As part of my ELLCC project (http://ellcc.org), I build clang/LLVM on my native x86_64 Linux box and then use it to compile itself. For further sanity checking, I then use that copy to cross compile for other targets (arm, armeb, i386, microblaze, mips, mipsel, ppc, and x86_64). After updating to a recent TOT revision, r195452, I get a strange error when cross compiling for the i386: