similar to: [LLVMdev] x86_64 code generation defects when SSE instructions are disabled

Hi all, Hypothetically, suppose I have a generic system with multiple address spaces such that each address space is accessed using different instructions. Now suppose, I wanted to add a new keywords 'foo' and 'bar' to the front of c variables and function return types such that the following would be valid: foo void* a; foo void* somefunc(){...} bar int b; int somefunc2(bar

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Aaron Myles Landwehr <snaphat at gmail.com> wrote: > Hypothetically, suppose I have a generic system with multiple address spaces > such that each address space is accessed using different instructions. > Now suppose, I wanted to add a new keywords 'foo' and 'bar' to the front of > c variables and function return types such that

This looks relevant to me for your issue. Grabbing the cxxabi.h from there may work: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/9391 -- Aaron Myles Landwehr On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:33 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi, all > > I am trying to selfhost LLVM and Clang. Below is my flow, > > Step 1. Build LLVM and Clang by using native gcc

Hi, all I am trying to selfhost LLVM and Clang. Below is my flow, Step 1. Build LLVM and Clang by using native gcc $ ../llvm-2.9/configure --prefix=$INSTALL \ --enable-optimized Step 2. Build LLVM and Clang by using clang built by step 1 $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ../llvm-2.9/configure \ --prefix=$INSTALL --enable-optimized But in step 2, I have a compilation error below, -- llvm[1]:

Our new/fresh dovecot imap installation on CentOS (latest from yum repository, which is 2.2.10) is locking up with a panic on a consistent basis and denying service to subsequent clients. The behavior is repeatable. Have spent weeks debugging and trying different configurations with no success. Specific /var/log/maillog error messages are: 12:06:54 dovecot: auth: Error: talloc: access after

We were trying to build a SuSE 9.1 box in a lab as a Domain Member server in a Windows Active Directory domain where the AD server was running Windows 2000 Server. We found that the instructions in Chapter 9.3.3 were, at least in our case, incomplete. The AD server was managing a private domain, so following the Windows Configure My Server wizard the domain was setup as

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

I''m attempting to use caches_page to speed up the loading of certain pages on my site, and have run into a couple questions: 1) The site has ''states'' (as in U.S. states), so I have a State model and a States controller. Going to http://sitename/states/ routes you to the States controller, ''index'' action. The States controller looks like so: class

I am having trouble understanding how the 'by' function works. Using this bit of code: i <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(0,0,0), B=c("red","blue","blue")) j <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(1,1,1), B=c('red','blue','green')) plot(0, 0, type="n", xlim=c(0,4), ylim=c(0,1)) by(i, i$B, function(s){ points(s$x, s$y, col=s$B) })

I have a working dialplan for our phone system with Mon-Fri, business hours identification, etc. But what I'm lacking right now is support for company holiday dates. What I'd like to do is to create a database of these dates and just update them as new years rollover. I suspect others have done this sort of thing with Asterisk before, but I've not found any resources so far.

The answer was (thanks to Mark Leeds) to do with the use of a factor instead of a vector. on [2017-08-05] at 08:57 Myles English writes: > I am having trouble understanding how the 'by' function works. Using > this bit of code: > > i <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3), y=c(0,0,0), B=c("red","blue","blue")) > j <- data.frame(x=c(1,2,3),

We have added Asterisk to a line of 'mission critical' servers at our business, and being in the web application development business one of the core things we do is to monitor web server availability. I'd like to add Asterisk to the servers that our monitoring systems are handling, and also that our SIP trunk provider has our Asterisk system correctly registered at all times.

> There is a big difference between SSE and SSEFP. The SSEFP means > that the CPU supports the xmm registers. All Intel chips with SSE support > do, however no current 32 bit AMD chips support the XMM registers. They > will support the SSE instructions but not those registers. You are right > about the SSE2 not being used. I'm still not sure I get it. On an Athlon

I''m following the Depot tutorial in the Rails book, and have just hit a wall. As instructed by the tutorial, I added the following code to the Product model: protected def validate errors.add(:price, "should be positive") unless price > 0.0 end When I attempt to add a new product, I''m getting an error: undefined method `>'' for nil:NilClass

I am trying to implement a change to our Dialplan that will thwart tele-spammers that are calling us with blanked out caller ID. The caller IDs seem to vary between originating callers when they block caller ID. I've seen the following: "anonymous" "" So I'm checking for these. However recently one company seems to be bypassing this, so what I wanted to do was

I have a new Asterisk system going into production next week and I'm a bit stumped as to the best way to handle the Dialplans for it. The Asterisk system is replacing 4 separate PSTN lines with both SIP & PSTN inputs. The setting up of the dial plan is giving me some design headaches, which probably means I'm missing something obvious and doing this the hard way. I have separate

Hi, Thanks for the patch. I think it's a good idea, although I can't apply it as is. The reason is that in its current form, the SSE version is not tested enough and isn't very clean in some aspects. For example, the order 10 filter is hard-coded and patched to work also for order 8 (less efficiently). Also, I think this should really go into 1.1.x (to become 1.2). I have already

I am not finding anything relating to this on Google, so I thought I'd pose the question here... I am running Asterisk 1.4 on a CentOS 5 Linux box. I needed to use a custom built PHP5.2.10 install to interconnect with our Firebird SQL database, which I've done. But I noticed that the default install path for PHP5 on this box appears to be /usr/local/bin/php rather than the path

I have an Asterisk 1.4.2 system installed at our office, and have a few 'on the road' sales people that want to make calls from their cell phones in transit, but they are complaining that people returning calls that they make from their cell phones are simply just using the CID that is coming from the cell phone which is causing them to get phone calls outside of business hours. What

> In the Atholon XP 2400+ that we have in our QA lab (Win2000 ) if you run > that code it generates an Illegal Instruction Error. In addition, an AMD > Duron (Windows ME) does the same thing. There are two possible reasons - > One is that those processors do not support xmm registers or the Operating > System does not support XMM registers. In the morning we will check the >