similar to: [LLVMdev] Replacing C-style function

Add some basic stand alone self tests for migrating system memory to device private memory and back. Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> --- lib/test_hmm.c | 323 ++++++++++++++++++++----- tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c | 292 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c

Hi! I am trying to get a combined coverage report from multiple executables. Looking at earlier discussions [1, 2], it looks like this is supposed to work. I am having some difficulty getting this to work as I would expect it to work, however. Following is a simple case to explain: ////////// shared.h #include <string> void Print1(const std::string& msg); void Print2(const

Hi Sadrul, > On Mar 8, 2018, at 7:40 PM, Sadrul Chowdhury via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi! I am trying to get a combined coverage report from multiple > executables. Looking at earlier discussions [1, 2], it looks like this > is supposed to work. I am having some difficulty getting this to work > as I would expect it to work, however. Following is

Hello, I configure my PDc as print server. With cups, I configure 3 printers (names : print1 print2 and prinnt3). After that I saw the error in the last printer's name. So I delete prinnt3 and create print3). But if I connect to my print server (using Windows), I have 4 printers : print1 -3 and prinnt3 I restart cups and reload smb daemon several times but the ghost is still there. I

Hi, I have the following test code print.c: #include <stdio.h> int main(){ fprintf(stderr, "Error!\n"); return 0; } I did the following on linux to cross-compile it for Sparc architecture: clang -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc (or llvm-gcc -m32 -c print.c -emit-llvm -o print.bc) llvm-dis < print.bc -o print2.bc llc -march=sparc -mcpu=v8 print2.bc -o print_s.s if

Dear List, How do I extract the approximate Wald test for the frailty (in the following example 17.89 value)? What about the P-values, other Chisq, DF, se(coef) and se2? How can they be extracted? ######################################################> kfitm1 Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time, status) ~ age + sex + disease + frailty(id, dist = "gauss"), data = kidney)

Hey there, If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I need lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'. You're probably thinking to yourself, "Oh geez, not

Long time no chat! How have you been? If you've been like me, you've been trying trying almost EVERYTHING to lose weight.  I know how you feel - the special diets, miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped me lose the pounds I needed to lose either.  It seemed like the harder I worked at it, the less weight I lost - until I heard about 'Extreme Power Plus'.

Hi Conrado, > I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the > mailing list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a > function that's been called already by some other function? why do you want to do this? > Suppose I have 3 files, all compiled to bytecode through llvm-gcc (I > think it could be clang instead). > > File1.c:

Hi Duncan, > I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing >> list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function >> that's been called already by some other function? >> > > why do you want to do this? > To implement something that is common in Lisp. Suppose I have a program that is running and can't be

Hi everybody. I've just started learning about LLVM and didn't get too far studying the core. I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function that's been called already by some other function? Suppose I have 3 files, all compiled to bytecode through llvm-gcc (I think it could be clang

Hello all I followed samba4 how to ( CentOS6 minimum install ) #working fro me ./configure.developer make #failed for me [root at dcmsc samba-4.0.0alpha16]# make quicktest WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf test --quick 'test' finished successfully (0.000s) Waf: Entering directory `/root/download/samba-4.0.0alpha16/bin' [ 111/3389] Generating VERSION Waf: Leaving directory

In the hope for some help, I would like some hint on how to diagnose the following single subunit: samba3.blackbox.smbclient_machine_auth.plain In particular the single test samba3.blackbox.smbclient_machine_auth.plain (s4member:local)(s4member:local) Results attached, run is from git at 'origin/v4-10-stable' Thanks in advance (This is because in my full selftest almost all failures

Thanks for the reply, Besides the problem with source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c, Good to hear that selftest is actively used, then do I understand it right that 'make test' should succeed? My bigger problem is that it failed with lots of errors. This must be a problem with my build, then, but since this is a fresh tarball I am a bit puzzled. I would appreciate some hint on