Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly"
2013 Nov 20
1
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:00:44PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> Tobias,
>>>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>>>
>>>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
2013 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Tobias,
>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>
>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
>> ===================================================================
>> --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142)
>> +++ CMakeLists.txt (working
2013 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Tobias,
>>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>>
>>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
>>> ===================================================================
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Tobias,
> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>
> Index: CMakeLists.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142)
> +++ CMakeLists.txt (working copy)
> @@ -81,9 +81,14 @@ set(CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_MODULE_PAT
>
> FIND_PACKAGE(Isl
2013 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] -polly-codegen-isl
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:23:59AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Tobi,
> What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing
> polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated
> in 3.3?
> Jack
Tobi,
Is it even possible to build polly without cloog at the moment or is the presence of
the -polly-codegen-isl
2013 Feb 10
3
[LLVMdev] -polly-codegen-isl
Tobi,
What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing
polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated
in 3.3?
Jack
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] disabling cloog in llvm 3.4
Tobias,
Would it be possible to add a cmake option to disable the use of cloog in
the polly build for 3.4? Currently the toplevel CMakeLists.txt in polly has...
FIND_PACKAGE(Isl REQUIRED)
FIND_PACKAGE(Gmp REQUIRED)
FIND_PACKAGE(Cloog)
FIND_PACKAGE(Pluto)
with no cmake option to avoid executing...
FIND_PACKAGE(Cloog)
I have been deinstalling the fink cloog packages, so that
2013 Jun 28
1
[LLVMdev] [polly] isl-only polly build in cmake
Tobias,
Do we have cmake flags to set with -D that will allow polly to build
as isl-only (with using cloog) yet? Thanks in advance for any info.
Jack
2016 Oct 10
2
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project
Hi Timo:
You need to find LLVMConfig.cmake in the binary or install directory tree,
not the source tree.
Although I don't embed clang/llvm, my config might help you figure it --
clang/llvm installed under (could have used build directory) ~/usr :
$ cd /Users/dhinton/projects/cover/build/ && rm -rf * && CC=~/usr/bin/clang
CXX=~/usr/bin/clang++ LLVM_DIR=~/usr/lib/cmake/llvm
2016 Oct 10
2
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project
Sorry my example wasn't helpful.
I did take a quick look at rust -- though I didn't download or try to build
it -- and they seem to allow you to use an installed or prebuilt version in
addition to building it in-tree. However, even when they build it in-tree,
they build the whole thing -- see mk/llvm.mk.
Good luck...
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev <
2012 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] [polly] ISL vector code generation
Hi,
thanks to Tobias for doing most of the work to get the vector code generation
working with ISL's code generation. Attached are two patches to port the vector
code generation part of the testsuite from Cloog/CodeGen to Isl/CodeGen.
Tobi, do you want to commit these two patches separately, or you want me to
combine them, as the second patch is needed to make the testsuite pass?
Also, let
2012 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] problem with my LLVM pass
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:04:46 +0530
Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> i am wondering if this link is still updated?
>
> http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#developing-llvm-pass-out-of-source
>
> i follow the instruction from the link, and create in my ~/test/
> directory the CMakeLists.txt with following content:
>
<snip>
> CMake Warning at
2012 Oct 05
4
[LLVMdev] problem with my LLVM pass
hi,
i am wondering if this link is still updated?
http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#developing-llvm-pass-out-of-source
i follow the instruction from the link, and create in my ~/test/
directory the CMakeLists.txt with following content:
$cat test/CMakeLists.txt
find_package(LLVM)
# Define add_llvm_* macro's.
include(AddLLVM)
add_definitions(${LLVM_DEFINITIONS})
2013 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Performance comparison between Cloog and ISL code generation
Hello all,
The performance comparison between Polly's Cloog and ISL code generator is posted on http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/59?compare_to=58&baseline=58
It seems their execution-time performance are comparable:
Performance Regressions - Execution Time (ISL over Cloog)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt 8.49%
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I looks like the code is calling dlopen() on LLVMPolly.so and it or something it links against has an initializer. The initialer is run before dlopen() returns and the crash is in the initializer. The message:
>>
>> dyld: fast lazy bind offset out of range (53437, max=7640) in image
2013 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
Hi,
Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>
> >On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> >> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
>
2013 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
Hi Sebastian, thanks for your reply!
At 2013-09-27 03:33:04,"Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:>Hi,
>
>Star Tan wrote:
>> At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>
>> >On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
>> >> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at
2012 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] cloog/isl required for polly 3.2?
Tobi,
From your previous comments off-list, I assume that the polly 3.2
branch still needs changes backported from polly trunk in order to solve
the polly-test testsuite failures against current cloog git and isl 0.11.
Also, we still need the cloog 0.18 tarballs created for polly 3.2 as it
is incompatible with the current cloog release. Any chance of these
issues being resolved before the llvm
2013 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
>> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached patch file to update lit
2012 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
>
> I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
> dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing
> another patch