similar to: [LLVMdev] CMake pools for linking?

On 14 November 2013 17:43, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Renato, thanks for your elaborate walk-through of the issues with ARM > boards. I'm trying to add some of this to the "How to Build on ARM" > document and will submit a patch later on. > Nice, thanks! That would be great! Unfortunately, my personal budget does not allow me more than a

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. > > If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, > perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it > into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend > hundreds of hours munging

I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a "short" treatise on how to do it, in case anybody needs to do this sometime in the future. I expect

Hi, I am battling what seems to be an endless list of issues with setting up a Windows build slave. This time, my problem is that the buildbot master tries to run configure. I see two ways out of this: 1. Let the [censored] system have its way and configure the build slave so that it is a Cygwin script that launches the build slave on the build machine. 2. Convince zorg to use CMake

Hi Dmitri, I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good reasons to switch to something else, I'll be happy to do that, although I am generally very happy about Arch Linux.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Renato, > > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)?

On 17 November 2013 05:15, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > I finally got it to work - and my ODROID-XU is now a passive member of the > LLVM builder society for the next week or so, until it has proven itself > (it monitors changes to the SVN repository and builds in my end without > bothering anyone at LLVM.org about its findings). I did write up a

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > I am not using any kind of cache (didn't even know of ccache). I have now > installed ccache. Perhaps ccache should be mentioned in the buildbot > document so that every buildbot owner knows about it? Possibly. > It is currently running Arch Linux ARM. if there are good

Thanks for spotting those errors! Fixed. If you feel that this doc should be part of the LLVM documentation, perhaps in a revised form, just let me know. I am willing to convert it into reST and also to go through a peer review, but I simply cannot spend hundreds of hours munging about, rewriting, and retesting over and over as I am already busy on other documentation and other sub-projects.

I'll use a redirection to the new article then. Did you try out the .htaccess thingy we talked about on LLVM.org? It should work, without any webmaster's assistance. 2013/11/21 Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Hi Renato, >> >> My XU is on build

It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites. Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM documentation - a place where tiny

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. >> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a >> starving bee. I

Hi Renato, My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? I will have to move it sometime because it is somewhat noise once it begins to build. Do you know if I can plug in

Is it just me or would it be nifty if Clang emitted a warning message when it generates an "ud2" (UnDefined2) instruction. I know this is x86-specific, but it would be sort of nice to know up front. After all, the compiler knows perfectly well that it is outputting an "ud2" instruction and I'm pretty sure almost every programmer out there would like to share the unhappy

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > http://llvm.lyngvig.org/Articles/How-to-Setup-an-Arch-Linux-Buildbot-for-LLVM > Notice: You only need Ninja for the test build; none of the official LLVM builders use Ninja as far as I know. My buildbots use ninja. > Please notice that you must specify the absolute path to ninja, otherwise CMake

On 20 November 2013 23:11, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)? > That's good to

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. > It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a > starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm > simply more familiar with the format I use on my own

StackOverflows says two things: 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= http://example.com/" />. 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends server redirects. It seems that LLVM.org is served by Apache 2.2.22 running on Ubuntu. In that case, the .htaccess file should make it possible to do server redirects:

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > StackOverflows says two things: > > 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= > http://example.com/" />. > 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends > server redirects. > > It seems that LLVM.org is served by

Doing this would make clang's diagnostic output dependent on the optimization level, which is absolutely verboten. Also, a ud2 doesn't mean your program has a bug, and I doubt an asm-level diagnostic would be useful to anyone. A ud2 just means "if control flow ever reaches this point, the program has undefined behavior"; in that sense, they don't even have to be emitted.