similar to: [LLVMdev] Quick question about Unicode support

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or > should I just grab them using wget? The website is at http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/ . The llvm docs are in llvm/docs. Which actually makes me wonder if the LLVM-project FAQ (in reference to Chandler's post in

Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> writes: [snip] > Yes, I am quite familiar with the CMake documentation, but why are you > asking? That's not the cmake documentation, that's the LLVM cmake documentation: a short document that tries to explain everything you need to know about cmake to build LLVM. I had the impression that you were duplicating a large chunk of the info

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending

Thank you so much for your hard work! LLVM/Clang is in need of motivated Windows developers willing to put in the time to make the LLVM/Clang experience better on Windows :) Quick note on the reST: instead of using a construct like: **Notice:** If you only want to build 32-bit programs, you do **not** need to install MinGW64. Prefer to use the reStructuredText "admonitions" <

btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >

The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?

On Jun 13, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > > bare

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Without ANY intent of offending anybody, I simply don't like C++. I did > code in it for some 12 years back from 1990 to 2002, but then I left it > behind with a feeling of happiness. The main reason I am _trying_ to make > a new language is that I hope to one day come up with something that

Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> > The irony of this reply is killing me :) > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> You're not alone :)

Without ANY intent of offending anybody, I simply don't like C++. I did code in it for some 12 years back from 1990 to 2002, but then I left it behind with a feeling of happiness. The main reason I am _trying_ to make a new language is that I hope to one day come up with something that can help retiring C++. I love C# but that language is yet too slow for many demanding problem domains.

Yes, sorry, the LLVM CMake documentation :-) I don't think I am duplicating a large chunk; I am continuously trying to shave off extraneous and redundant stuff off my Windows-specific document. I just managed to shave off about six lines or so because I don't like the huge introduction and explanation of what MinGW is. Now that the document covers Ninja, there's even more reason for

We should make LLD to be able to build with GCC even if GCC is a bit buggy. So you wrote that it's no longer build because of the recent change of makeArrayRef removal? I think it's my change (r196475). Can you confirm that you can build if you revert that change? If it has caused the build with GCC to break, we should roll it back. On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mikael Lyngvig

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi Renato, > > My XU is on build 141 and there hasn't been a single problem yet. No > reboots, no crashes, and as far as I have observed no core dropouts (after > I did the cpu-freq trick you sent me). Perhaps I have a stable board or > perhaps it is because of its revision (rev. 0.3)?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. >> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a >> starving bee. I

I tried this command to undo the change (which should revert to the change just before the one you mentioned): svn update -rr196474 Then I built from scratch. This time it built, so I suppose it is revision 196475 that is the problem. -- Mikael 2013/12/9 Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> > We should make LLD to be able to build with GCC even if GCC is a bit > buggy. So you

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > StackOverflows says two things: > > 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= > http://example.com/" />. > 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends > server redirects. > > It seems that LLVM.org is served by

I'll use a redirection to the new article then. Did you try out the .htaccess thingy we talked about on LLVM.org? It should work, without any webmaster's assistance. 2013/11/21 Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Hi Renato, >> >> My XU is on build

It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites. Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM documentation - a place where tiny

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > http://llvm.lyngvig.org/Articles/How-to-Setup-an-Arch-Linux-Buildbot-for-LLVM > Notice: You only need Ninja for the test build; none of the official LLVM builders use Ninja as far as I know. My buildbots use ninja. > Please notice that you must specify the absolute path to ninja, otherwise CMake

StackOverflows says two things: 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= http://example.com/" />. 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends server redirects. It seems that LLVM.org is served by Apache 2.2.22 running on Ubuntu. In that case, the .htaccess file should make it possible to do server redirects: