similar to: [LLVMdev] Moderators needed for LLVM Dev Meeting!!

Hi all, Currently studying the impact of SMT solvers on Clang SA. Can anyone help in telling more about the SMT solvers use in clang SA ? ( Have already tested Z3 SMT solver implemented in GSoC 2018 , also looking for other SMT solvers if possible ) Thanks, Siddharth -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We are currently implementing the backends for other solvers (you can follow the progress here: https://github.com/mikhailramalho/clang). So far we got Boolector, MathSAT and Yices ready. CVC4 should be done soon. When used to refute bugs, they all give roughly the same results: a ~5% speedup if there are refuted bugs or a ~5% slowdown if no bug is refuted. I've only tried to analyze one

We are in desperate need of volunteers to moderate the sessions during the LLVM Developers Meeting. If you are attending and can act as moderator for a group of talks, please let us know. We need 5 more volunteers to moderate the following sessions. Please note your first choice session to moderate and your second choice: Session #1 (11:05-12:35): Integrating LLVM into FreeBSD: Brooks Davis –

SMT solvers seem more general-purpose than we need. We just need an ILP solver of some kind (Omega, PIP, TaPAS, ...) for almost all uses I can think of. Do you want to do more powerful symbolic analysis for some purpose? --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:08 PM, John Regehr wrote: >

Hello all, My name is Ashish Kumar Gahlot and I am a final year undergraduate student of Engineering College Ajmer(Rajasthan, India) majoring in Computer Science. I am interested in working on project *Integrate with Z3 SMT solver to reduce false positives *for GSOC 2018. I am having experience with SMT solvers as I play CTFs and have used z3 to solve reverse engineering problems. How can I

I'm still in need for moderators for the following sessions: > Moderator #3 (11:15-12:45, Regency 1) > Verified LLVM: Formalizing the semantics of the LLVM Intermediate Representation for Verified Program Transformations- Santosh Nagarakatte, University of Pennsylvania/Rutgers University > Integrated Security, using LLVM for Dynamic and Static Security Tasks- Jared Carlson,

Hello, I am in need of moderators to help moderate each session. If you are interested, please respond to this mail and indicate which slot you can moderate. Its a long shot as you would miss talks, but if anyone wants a break to do work or check email while also staffing the registration desk, please let me know if you can do it during any of the sessions below. Thanks! Options: Moderator #1

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > We do have a static array bounds checking algorithm based on the Omega > integer programming library, but it is not hugely effective. I think > this can be strengthened a *lot*. I should add that I would be interested in helping with hooking a good decision procedure into LLVM. This will be useful far beyond array bounds check

All, I'm needing volunteers to help moderate the sessions of the LLVM Developers' Meeting. All you need to do is introduce the speaker, make sure the speaker stays on time, and run Q&A at the end (run a microphone, select people, etc). Its a pretty easy job, but critical for our meeting to run smoothly. If you are interested in moderating, please send me your top 2 session choices.

LLVM Developer Meeting Attendees, I need to get a count of the people planning to stay after the meeting for dinner. If we have a large enough group, we may need to make special arrangements. Attendees will have to pay for their own dinner, but we can get reservations or possibly reserve a banquet room. So please email me by May 11th, if you plan to go to dinner. Thanks, Tanya Lattner

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting. We are looking for the following proposals: - Technical Talks on LLVM Infrastructure (~30 minutes) - Technicals Talks on related sub-projects (Clang, etc) - Talks of uses of LLVM in academia or industry - Talks on new projects

The 2017 LLVM Developers’ Meeting relies on volunteers to keep things running smoothly. Moderators are critical to this as they keep speakers on track and facilitate Q&A after the talk. I’m looking for community members who would be attending specific talks anyway, to volunteer to moderate the session. If you are interested in volunteering, please respond to this email with your first and

What, the deadline is tomorrow?!? The deadline for proposals snuck up on me, and I'm sure many of you forgot as well. Therefore, I am extending the deadline. I have received some great talk proposals, so keep them coming. However, I have very few tutorials, BoFs, posters, or lightening talk proposals. So please, get those proposals in and lets make this year the best developer meeting yet!

I could use some input to point out the error in my configuration, which eludes me. Previously I operated a 225-node cluster with samba 4.3 and sssd on the Linux boxes. Everything worked OK. Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using winbind in place of sssd (my first experience with winbind). BIND9_DLZ

Hi All, About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf "Application Note #176 Modbus Implementation in APC Smart-UPS" The APC "announcement" appeared on their site in their user blogs by an APC employee, here:

CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config, same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host name: % df -P | grep smt <hostname>:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home/smt and on some just the IP address: % df -P | grep smt aa.bb.cc.dd:/mnt/foo

Hello Ted, 2013/9/11 Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> > Hi All, > > About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol > support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: > > http://www.apcmedia.com/**salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-**98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf<http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf>

Is this the appropriate place to talk about spec_distributed? If not, I''ll post the spec-ext (seemingly dead) mailing list on rubyforge... I was able to run a non-rails project with Spec::Distributed::RindaSlaveRunner (and RindaMasterRunner). But I''m stumped on how to do it with a rails project, when I have rspec trunk installed. I continue to get wrong error

On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/02/2020 19:15, Steve Thompson via samba wrote: >> Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. > Have you compiled Samba yourself, or are you using Samba packages and if so, > where from ? >> The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using >> winbind in place of sssd

Hi, with regards Intels L1TF vulnerabilities, it seems they are somewhat non-committal on whether turning off HyperThreading is required, suggesting people > Consult with your hypervisor vendor for more guidance. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/l1tf.html#faq-answers-10-0 What is the consensus in the Libvirt community about the risks (or not) of leaving