similar to: [LLVMdev] Attach state from clang to LLVM

Metadata will do exactly this, but the cost is that because you didn't teach the optimizers about your metadata, they are free to drop it on the floor whenever they optimize. If you want something persistent, consider adding your own intrinsics or function calls that are appropriately annotated as readnone etc and hope they don't affect optimization too much. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at

I post this to the mailing list, but perhaps is not the good place. I'm not subscribed, so I don't know if I'm going to get any reply, but please, tell me where to send patches. I attach two patches that correctly describes the new support for F11 and F12 in documentation but I have two more question to update documentation accordingly. In doc/syslinux.txt line 515, talking about

Hi all. I've ordered a TDM400P with 4 FXO, but after using my X100P I'm thinking about returning the TDM400P because of bad echo issues. If I do get the echo issues I'll look at digital options. My question: Is anyone using ISDN (BRI) in the states? I've heard ISDN4LINUX devices suffer bad echo but chan_capi works great. All the chan_capi cards I find though are for overseas

2013/10/23 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > > Sorry for the unclear statements, I didn't means the assembler to mangle > > symbols declared in assembly source files, I means directly use assembly > > directive to choice which symbol should be used. The compiler just need > to > > follow the directive. > > For example, in assembly

I'm looking to tackle PR5680 [1]. The primary goal is to prevent behaviour changes in passes that depend on the order of use lists when serializing/deserializing the IR to a bitcode file (.bc) between passes. Here's a quick high-level summary: - When writing bitcode, calculate what the use list order will be after reading the bitcode. (Assumption: the order is predictable.) -

Is that really going to make a significant difference? I've been looking at the same issue, in my case trying to make a simple JIT (using only LLVM at the time, not trying to use clang to parse and then JIT, but rather deserializing bytecode and JIT it). I made the simplest example I could based on my limited knowledge of the interfaces, and even linking with -dead_strip and optimizing for

Hey all, I have an as5300 I use for dial in customers, we have 4 PRIs on it. We have a few free channels on it. I'm wondering if I setup SIP on the as5300 I can have asterisk use the free channels for dial out. I'd still have to use my TDM04B for incoming calls, but at least I can expand my outgoing. Anyone done anything like this before? I've never messed with VoIP on Cisco

http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+bounty+SIP+simultaneous+registry From the WIKI: Contributions Manager: Daniel Jimenez (cuban) Bounty: $50 USD Date opened: July 10, 2004 Contributors: cuban ($50) Detail Yes, Yes I know you could do all sorts of fun with the dialplan to produce a similar effect, but I still would like to be able to do this. Plus it's easy money :). I

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92961 Bug ID: 92961 Summary: Xorg freezes (only mouse and ssh are still working) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: high Component: Driver/nouveau

I''m just wondering. Is there an easy way to take a hash that I have and store it in a DB text column and then read it as a hash from it again. The reason is that I have a db table called contents. But it stores all kinds of information and even data that I do not know of yet. I know I could store it inside the text column using XML or YAML or something else but then I would have to

On Jun 25, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi all, Howdy Matthijs, > I've also been developing an interest in using IR annotations for my > compiler. > Some discussion with Bart turns out that he has implemented some > code to parse > the llvm.globals.annotations array, but in no way integrated or > reusable. > We've spent some thought about how

2013/10/23 Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> > I don't think we should attempt to mangle symbols declared in assembly > source files. If you're writing assembly, you will need to handle ABI > Sorry for the unclear statements, I didn't means the assembler to mangle symbols declared in assembly source files, I means directly use assembly directive to choice which symbol

Hello, I upgraded to llvm 2.8 and when I generate *.ll files from C/C++ with clang -S -emit-llvm I obtain a *.ll file in which instructions and basicblocks have no names. I tried as well compiling with the -g option, but no names were given. In the release notes it is indicated to use "--show-annotations" to print the number of uses. Is there something similar for assigning names to

Hi, all My Asterisk uses a Digium TE120Pand I would like to add an Astribank zaptel_hardware sees is, but I cannot get it working pbx:~# zaptel_hardware Argument "IRQ" isn't numeric in numeric comparison (<=>) at /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8/Zaptel/Span.pm line 114. usb:005/002 xpp_usb- e4e4:1131 Astribank-8/16 USB-firmware pci:0000:04:00.0 wcte12xp+

Hi all, I've also been developing an interest in using IR annotations for my compiler. Some discussion with Bart turns out that he has implemented some code to parse the llvm.globals.annotations array, but in no way integrated or reusable. We've spent some thought about how this could be done properly, which I will share here. Firstly, however, I was wondering about the format of the

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Archie Cobbs wrote: >>> With no annotation support, it doesn't seem like you can. This is >>> the problem. I'm not saying annotations are good, just that they >>> represent one (sub-optimal) solution to the problem. Without them, >>> we have zero solutions to the problem. >> >> Why do you believe this? > > Sorry,

> thanks for your reply. Sorry for the delay, I've been buried in email lately. >>> When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some >>> semantics are lost: >>> >> LLVM 1.6 and the "new front-end" already handle this right. Here's the >> bugzilla bug corresponding to it: >>

Hi everyone, I'm very new to all this, so please forgive me if I have the terminology mixed-up. We are preparing to install an Asterisk IP PBX over the weekend and I have an issue with the Polycom SP 500 phones we are trying to use. My problem is regarding DHCP. Our DHCP server is our Cisco PIX 501 firewall. I've specified option 66 and the phones connect to the FTP server

All, There seems to be a hullaboo about a vulnerability in R when deserializing untrusted data: https://hiddenlayer.com/research/r-bitrary-code-execution https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27322 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/238194 Apparently a fix was made for R 4.4.0, but I see no mention of it in the changes report: https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/NEWS.R-4.4.0.html

hello,i got a error message when use virsh attach-interface for a vm: first, list the vm's interface,there's no interface now. virsh # domiflist ubuntum-124 Interface Type Source Model MAC ------------------------------------------------------- then,i did an attach-interface action: virsh # attach-interface ubuntum-124 bridge br0 --persistent Interface attached