similar to: [LLVMdev] Name of Virtual Registers

Hello all, My app is using LLVM JIT as a runtime engine for image analysis (similar to opencl). I'm placing values into a struct to pass byref to a series of functions. After running the createStandardModulePasses(...) set of optimizations, the function calls are all inlined but the struct store/load pairs haven't been optimized away. I've attached the code below. What I'd like to

Hello all, My app is using LLVM JIT as a runtime engine for image analysis (similar to opencl). I'm placing values into a struct to pass byref to a series of functions. After running the createStandardModulePasses(...) set of optimizations, the function calls are all inlined but the struct store/load pairs haven't been optimized away. I've attached the code below. What I'd like to

I have cloned an instruction from one basic block to another newly created block in newly created function. And since am cloning an instruction the operands of that instruction still points to the instructions of old block. Due to which am getting an error as "Instruction does not dominate all uses!". example:- original function and block:- %a = alloca i32, align 4 %x = alloca

Hi guys, Now, I''m looking for a method to modify packet headers/contents when they arrive at xen bridges (e.g. xenbr0). For example, I consider a following operation; when a xen bridge recieves a packet(frame), it firstly encrypts the content using a predefined key, and then forwards it to other host/router. Is is possible to add such functionality to the xen bridge ? Any ideas,

On Jul 15, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com> wrote: > Jakob, one more hint, I've placed some asserts around the code you added and noticed that the InlineSpiller::insertReload() function is not being called. > > 2012/7/14 Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com> > Hello Jakob, > > I'm still getting the error, I can give you any other

I think I'm getting a bit closer to the problem. I've found that the call to InlineSpiller::foldMemoryOperand() inside InlineSpiller::spillAroundUses() is causing the problems. As a test, I removed that call and with your yesterday's patch I'm not getting any errors at all, the code generated is the same one as with the call. This is happening when

How to get memory address of all operands which constitutes an expression ? eg. a=b+c; (want to know the memory address of b and c)...... Since I want this at run time, So at assembly level this expression will become something like as follows:- Load r1, M[b] Load r2, M[c] r3=r1+r2 store M[a],r3 Now what i want to do is that, at every store instruction, I should get the memory address of all

@Jim Grosbach, Is there anyway to resolve it??? -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/LLVM-ERROR-Invalid-instruction-tp59856p59865.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I wanted to count the number of "*LLVM*" instruction executed dynamically in any program. Have already tried "lli -stats -force-interpreter filename.bc", but it's not giving any information related to instruction count. lli --version output:- LLVM version 3.4svn DEBUG build with assertions. Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Host CPU: corei7 -- View

> in LLVM IR, the operands of most expression are registers, so don't have a memory address. Yes I agree with your this statement, But before becoming part of the expressions, the registers will actually fetch some value from memory, through Load operations. as shown in example "r3=r1+r2" will be the expression, where registers such as r1 and r2 contains (fetch) the values from

Is it possible to have local users with mail in maildir:%h/.maildir and virutal users with mail in maildir:/home/exim/%u/.maildir I seem to have authentication working for both local users and LDAP users. But I'm getting this error trying to access a virtual users mail. Aug 17 08:12:08 hostname dovecot: IMAP(Firstname Lastname): maildir:

Hi, Somebody know any tool for convert Virutal machines from Vmware for Xen , I have used *qemu-img* but not work. Thanks . Bruno Steven -- Bruno Steven - Administrador de sistemas. LPIC-1 - LPI ID: lpi000119659 / Code: p2e4wz47e4 https://www.lpi.org/caf/Xamman/certification MCP-Windows 2003 - TranscriptID: 793804 / Access Code: 080089100

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Abhinash Jain <omnia at mailinator.com>wrote: > > But before becoming part of the expressions, the registers will actually > fetch some value from memory, through Load operations. > This is not true; the virtual registers need not be loaded from memory. You may find <

On Jul 26, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Abhinash Jain <omnia at mailinator.com> wrote: > Is there anyway to resolve it??? 1. Teach the cpp backend how to handle it. 2. Compile with -fno-exceptions to turn off exceptions. -- Stephen Checkoway

What''s going on? # dtrace -s iotime_all.d 100 dtrace: failed to enable ''iotime_all.d'': DIF program content is invalid The errant script.... #pragma D option quiet BEGIN { stime = timestamp; io_count = 0; } io:::start /args[2]->fi_pathname != "<none>"/ { start[pid, args[2]->fi_pathname, args[0]->b_edev, args[0]->b_blkno,

Hi, when user create the virtual machine, then: which code execute firstly, hvmloaer or qemu-dm?I have traced the codes flow and found qemu-dm run before hvmloader,right? And virtual bios code are both in hvmloader and qemu-dm, but I think it should be only one of virtual bios will be used to initialize the virutal device in qemu-dm.I find at the end of hvmloader it will jmp to 0xffff0, that

How about state of SVA (Secure Virutal Archtecture)? It seems there is no any demo or prototype produced. Cheers, Liu Jian ---- email to: gjk.liu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100420/e8dc1b16/attachment.html>

Hi there, for an application (which is only available on windows) I need to have the MS Virutal machine, which is supplied with IE4 SP3 and more, so I downloaded IE 5.0 and tried to install it. I think the main problem is, that I am new to wine and maybe my problem isn't really a problem.... If I run "wine --debugmsg +warn IE5Setup.exe" the assistant starts and after that crashes

This is a spawn of another issue partly solved by hack: http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=14547&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= In short, I couldn't run Manga Studio with Wine in a Live Session (Live DVD), unless I signed in as superuser, which then pops up a virtual memory control allwoing me to set memory and launch Manga Studio fine. This control

I've read documentation (obviously not the right parts) and googled, but I can't seem how to solve this simple problem: I have a machine running postfix/dovecot and using virtual domains, delivery happens with dovecot's LDA. I also have an Exchange machine that I have to house some of the users of a given domain. How can I tell either postifx in general or dovecot's LDA that