similar to: [LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT"

2013 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
Hi Christian, Thanks for sharing this. Yaron Keren has been investigating some problems in the EH frame registration code recently, and I think this may be related. It at least sounds similar to the type of variations in behavior based on code size that Yaron was seeing. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of
2013 Oct 14
3
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
Hi, I had similar problems with EH in ELF in RTDyldMemoryManager::registerEHFrames() calling __register_frame(). I'm not sure these problems are related to this problem since your crash happens in RuntimeDyldMachO::registerEHFrames() in its own processFDE (there are two functions named processFDE(), one in RuntimeDyldMachO.cpp and one in RTDyldMemoryManager.cpp) *before*
2015 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] Assertion: replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type! being thrown all of a sudden
Hello, I wonder if someone would know what is going on below. All of a sudden I’m getting this assertion thrown: Assertion failed: (New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"), function replaceAllUsesWith, file /Users/meister/Development/externals-clasp/llvm36/lib/IR/Value.cpp, line 345. It’s happening when
2013 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
Yaron, Did you find a way around the problem? It looks like the problem comes before processFDE because by the time it gets to processFDE the eh_frame data is already corrupted. Does ELF and MachO share the same eh_frame format? I am developing this code in parallel on an Ubuntu Linux system but I haven't tried to run it on there for a couple of weeks. I'll bring it up to date and
2013 Apr 24
2
[LLVMdev] Questions about attaching DWARF source code debugging information to generated LLVM-IR.
I upgraded my versions of llvm, clang and compiler-rt to the top-of-tree versions from last night (r180162, April 24). I recompiled debug versions of llvm, clang and my code. I then regenerated my test case and the results were the same - I can list lines of dwarf1.lsp in lldb but I can't set break-points or do anything else (what else should I be able to do?). The updated file that
2013 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] Questions about attaching DWARF source code debugging information to generated LLVM-IR.
One other thing that may or may not illuminate the situation. When I run under gdb (on OS X 10.8.3 this is an ancient version of gdb 6.3.5 - but it works with clang compiled C++ code) I get the following error when I try to list a line in dwarf1.lsp: Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_<unknown> in DWARF reader [in module /Users/meister/Development/cando/src/tests/core/dwarf1.bundle] (gdb)
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Assertion: replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type! being thrown all of a sudden
I forgot to mention this in my initial email. The build of LLVM that I was using was commit a0d5d7aed8e177cea381b3d054d80c212ece9f2c The date on the commit is: Date: Fri Sep 26 12:34:06 2014 Also: Today I grabbed the ToT llvm/clang/clang-extra-tools and I’m working on getting my code to be compatible with it. I can switch back and forth between the current ToT llvm and the old one. Thanks,
2015 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] How to run LLVM3.6.1 on OS X (Yosemite, Xcode6.4) OR how to link bitcode generated by OS X clang with LLVM3.6.1
I’m developing a Common Lisp compiler for OS X and Linux that uses LLVM as its backend and interoperates with C++. It’s at: github.com/drmeister/clang I need to compile one C++ source file containing small, intrinsic functions into an LLVM-IR bitcode file and link it with bitcode generated by my compiler running LLVM3.6.1. I have been unable to do this for more than a year and I was hoping
2013 Oct 14
2
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
Hi, There may be two problems with __register_frame usage. However based on http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061768.html I think the existing code is correct for OS-X but likely buggy for Linux and Windows systems. Your crash is on OS-X, right? Anyhow, the first problem is very easy to fix. On Linux and Windows (at least) __register_frame should be called once and not
2013 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT
If I spoke incorrectly about what systems this problem/change effects I apologize. I'll leave it to Andrew to determine that. Best, .Chris. "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> writes: > Yes, you are correct Yaron.  Before we commit this we ought to put a > check in to see what the target OS is.  I just suggested the change > below as a quick and easy way
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] How to run LLVM3.6.1 on OS X (Yosemite, Xcode6.4) OR how to link bitcode generated by OS X clang with LLVM3.6.1
Thank you. I found a partial answer to the problem (1), namely “how to run Clang compiled with LLVM3.6.1 on OS X Yosemite/Xcode6.4" It’s a combination of -isysroot and -resource-dir I’m using these compiler options: "/Users/meister/Development/externals-clasp/build/release/bin/clang" -v \ -resource-dir
2018 Nov 05
2
ORC JIT api, object files and stackmaps
Hi Christian Your use case seems to have similar requirements as remote JITing in ORC. So far I haven't used that part myself and I am sure Lang can tell you much more about it. However, this comment on the RemoteObjectClientLayer class sounds promising for your questions (1) and (2): /// Sending relocatable objects to the server (rather than fully relocated /// bits) allows JIT'd code
2017 Nov 06
3
ORC JIT and multithreading
2019 Aug 08
6
New ORC v2 LLJIT - global variables
We are trying to switch to the new orc v2 lljit engine at my work with hopes of parallel jitting. We are switching from the ExecutionEngine w/ OrcMCJitReplacement. We are having a hard time with global variables. We have found a way to create/emit new globals during jitting by using the old ExecutionEngine::getOrEmitGlobalVariable. Is there an easier way to do this with the new jit engine? We were
2017 Sep 25
2
Clang/LLVM JIT - When to use "registerEHFrames()"
Hello friendly LLVM-World, because I don't know if I had send my problem to the correct Mailing-List, I will send my problem to this address too. I'm not subscribed to this list, so please add my in CC if you response. Kind regards Björn From: Bjoern Gaier/HE/HORIBA To: Clang Dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>
2013 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Migration from JIT to MCJIT
Thank you for the help. The relocation type value is anded with 0xffffffffL. (RuntimeDyldMachO.cpp:214) Maybe this mask should be different? Anyway, it seems like this relocation isn't implemented. (RuntimeDyldMachO.cpp:104) From: Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com<mailto:jiwang at tilera.com>> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:42:03 -0400 To: Eran Weiss <eran.weiss at
2009 May 19
9
Ubuntu and play65 application
Hello guys I am a new ubuntu user and i am trying to install play65 application without success. I have installed the wine but nothing has been achieved. Anyone who can help me on this?
2017 Sep 28
2
Clang/LLVM JIT - When to use "registerEHFrames()"
Hello Stefan, I'm happy someone replied to my problem! Many thanks! To be honest... I didn't understood much of your mail. I'm a beginner with the JIT - so I will explain what I've done. To manage the memory and resolve symbols, I'm using my own Resolver-Class, which overloads the allocation and the findSymbol functions. I've noticed today, that the
2017 Sep 27
0
Clang/LLVM JIT - When to use "registerEHFrames()"
Hi Björn To first answer your questionin the subject: For x86 registerEHFrames() is only a stub. For x86_64 registerEHFrames() is implemented properly in RuntimeDyldCOFFX86_64, calling MemMgr.registerEHFrames() for each EH frame section. It should be called and work out of the box without your involvement, but unfortunately it won't solve your issue. All the essential information is there in
2014 Sep 25
5
[LLVMdev] New type of smart pointer for LLVM
Hello everyone, I bring to discussion the necessity/design of a new type of smart pointer. r215176 and r217791 rise the problem, D5443 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D5443> is devoted to the solution. r215176 applies several temporary ugly fixes of memory leaks in TGParser.cpp which would be great to be refactored using smart pointers. D5443 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D5443> demonstrates