similar to: [LLVMdev] Call for Removal: remove BreakpointPrinter and print-breakpoints-for-testing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Call for Removal: remove BreakpointPrinter and print-breakpoints-for-testing"

2013 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
Ping :) On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Might be
2013 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
The first patch seems fine, though the comment on the modified addDIEEntry function is a bit confusing: -/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. +/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. The form should be +/// a reference form: ref1, ref2, ref4, ref8, ref_udata, ref_addr, +/// or ref_sig8. A form can be chosen inside addDIEEntry. When the comment says "The form
2013 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren
2013 Oct 10
4
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > David, > > Thanks for reviewing! > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: >> >> 0001: >> This patch generally, while separated for
2013 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at
2013 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu,
2013 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
Ping -Manman On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > The first patch adds support for ref_addr. > Most of it is from r176882, but instead of always using an integer for > ref_addr, we use label + offset for relocation on non-darwin platforms. > > The second patch is a modified version of r191792. > The main
2013 Oct 17
1
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:00 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> patch looks fairly obvious/trivial >>> >>> Have you tried any of the test cases I've described (special members, >>> nested types, and member templates -
2013 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at
2013 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15,
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, David Blaikie
2013 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at
2013 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:38 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at
2013 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at
2013 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
David, Thanks for reviewing! On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: > > 0001: > This patch generally, while separated for legibility, is untested & > difficult to discuss in isolation. > I agree, this patch adds the functionality but does not use it,
2013 Nov 21
3
[LLVMdev] bit code file incompatibility due to debug info changes
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at
2013 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at
2013 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at