similar to: [LLVMdev] [polly] static link

On 09/26/2013 08:27 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > Rick is trying to set up a public buildbot for Polly on Windows. Right now the > community version of polly does not build on Windows. We would like to make it > possible to link polly statically to avoid several problems dealing with > building polly as a DLL. Great to hear. > I have a set of changes that make

Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 09/26/2013 08:27 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >Hi Tobi, > > > >Rick is trying to set up a public buildbot for Polly on Windows. Right now the > >community version of polly does not build on Windows. We would like to make it > >possible to link polly statically to avoid several problems dealing with > >building polly as a DLL. >

Hi Rick, Tobi, now that we have a way to link polly statically into the tools, we can turn on the windows polly build-bot. Let's speak about the config that the bot will run: ISL only (no CLooG), imath as a replacement for GMP, and cmake to configure llvm. The compiler will be MSVC 2013: we have verified that the current ISL version with the two patches that I sent out for ISL are compiling

Hi Tobi, I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for existing bots I might not be aware of. Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new ones? Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users of the builder. The plan would be have linux and windows cmake

On 02/03/2016 11:06 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/03/2016 04:46 PM, Frank Winter via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> On 02/03/2016 10:41 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 02/03/2016 04:37 PM, Frank Winter wrote: >>>> Hi Tobias, >>>> >>>> I tried to invoke other passes and none of them are available, e.g.: >>>>

2017-04-29 0:49 GMT+02:00 Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi! > > I encounter problem with Polly build (in-tree, libraries are linked > statically). It appeared ~ 2 days agor for first time. > > include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:73:14: fatal error: > 'llvm/IR/Attributes.gen' file not found > #include

Hi! I encounter problem with Polly build (in-tree, libraries are linked statically). It appeared ~ 2 days agor for first time. include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:73:14: fatal error: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.gen' file not found #include "llvm/IR/Attributes.gen" It seems that dependencies on IR are not set properly. Eugene.

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>>> Duncan, >>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly

Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 09/17/2013 04:12 AM, Star Tan wrote: > >Now, we come to more evaluations on http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity > > Hi Star Tan, > > thanks for this very extensive analysis. The results look very > interesting. As you found out, just removing some canonicalization > passes will reduce compile time, but this reduction

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias

On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >>> using the documentation at

On 09/25/2013 04:55 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Here is an update about moving Polly later. Hi star tan, thanks for your report. > > 1. Why does Polly generate incorrect code when we move Polly immediately after the loop rotating pass? > > It is mainly caused by a wrong polly merge block. When Polly detects a valid loop for Polyhedral transformations, it usually introduces a new basic

Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 04/17/2013 05:53 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >Hi, > > > >polly is run very early and schedules the following passes before it runs: > > > >/// @brief Schedule a set of canonicalization passes to prepare for Polly > >/// > >/// The set of optimization passes was partially taken/copied from the > >/// set of default

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli

H, Tobias Thank you for your reply. Tobias Grosser wrote: (Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:41:05 -0300) >On 06/08/2011 01:17 AM, MORIYAMA Tomohiro wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> I tried Polly installation on Ubuntu. >> >> On its building, it returned no errors. >> But when I run "make polly-test", it returns 11 unexpected failures as >> follows. >>

At 2013-09-25 18:03:18,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:> >I think this is too early, as most of the canonicalization is not yet  >done. We probably don't need to investigate this bug immediately, but >it would be nice if we could make it reproducible without your changes  >to polly. For this please run the command with -debug-pass=Arguments

On 09/30/2013 04:11 AM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-09-25 18:03:18,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:> >> I think this is too early, as most of the canonicalization is not yet >> done. We probably don't need to investigate this bug immediately, but >> it would be nice if we could make it reproducible without your changes >> to polly. For

On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: