similar to: [LLVMdev] SVN repository upgrade?

I''ve been getting increasing resistance from helpers who prefer Subversion over CVS. I feel that it''s slowing down development. So, done. Mailing lists, releases, news will still be at Rubyforge. Bug tracking will likely move to the new repository soon as well. The new repository is at: http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/ Checkout RedCloth from

I got problems running switchtower 0.10.0 when I try to run "rake deploy" from my local box (windows) to my shared hosting If I set the repository to (deploy.rb): set :repository, "file:///home/[my_user]/repo/[my_app]/trunk" My local box (windows) can''t reach the subversion repository located in site5 If I set the repository to: set :repository,

On 20 Aug 2013, at 10:35, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > Seems to be a known bug in SVN 1.8.0, can you try upgrading to 1.8.1 or downgrading to 1.7? Downgrading to 1.7.x means that I can't access my local repo, since there is no svn downgrade. Upgrading to 1.8.1 gives: svn: E175002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://theraven at

I''m using the Shovel recipe to deploy my lovely app to text drive. everyhting seems to be ok apart from the deploy action which fails saying that there is "No such file or directory" I''ve included the full error listing below. The SVN definately exists because we''re using for development. Does any one have any ideas what might be going wrong? Thanks Tom

The thing about this is that git-svn (un?)fortunately works so well that you can get all of these benefits with the main repo still in SVN. Hence, it is really a moot point regarding a switch to git for the main repo. E.g.: > Actually that's true today with svn. We have a ton of changes here we'd > like to submit but the process is really painful. Is there any difference from the

How do I set up a subversion repository so that svn can use an svnserve running locally? I own the repository. svnserve -d -r ... runs as me. svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk fails with svn: Authorization failed There is no request for credentials. Is anyone that can willing to share an example that works? I'm running CentOP 6.2 [hennebry at 67-61-185-5 reps]$

Hello I have problems with checkout using SVN. I am following instructions on page http://us2.samba.org/samba/subversion.html. First of all DNS can't resolve name svnanon.samba.org. I checked nslookup and dig on three different systems using three different providers - my office, T-Online and Litnet. DNS servers for all three providers responded that host name not found. I also got IP

On 15 Nov 2012, at 12:31, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > - Easier third-party merging. Merging via git merge/rebase is MUCH > simpler than merging a tarball from svn. I know the llvm leaders > don't seem to care about this but it is a real issue for many users. > > - Ease of fork/merge. git makes it easy to experiment with long-lived > development branches. svn

David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> writes: > On 15 Nov 2012, at 12:31, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > >> - Easier third-party merging. Merging via git merge/rebase is MUCH >> simpler than merging a tarball from svn. I know the llvm leaders >> don't seem to care about this but it is a real issue for many users. >> >> - Ease of

My setup : Debian Etch i386 httpd-2.0.61 configured with the following command "./configure --prefix=/opt/httpd-2.0.61 --with-mpm=worker --enable-so --enable-dav=shared --enable-unique-id=shared --enable-version=shared --enable-ssl=shared --enable-info=shared --enable-cgi=shared --enable-rewrite=shared --enable-cache=shared -- enable-disk-cache=shared --enable-deflate=shared"

On 11/27/06, Scott Michel <scottm at rushg.aero.org> wrote: > Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > >>the official cutover. Granted, you might need darcs to pull the current > >>version out of its repo, since it was originally designed with darcs in > >>mind. > > > > I can confirm, that tailor converts LLVM CVS with all history preserved > > to mercurial

I don’t know what you mean by dealing with the merging, I don’t expect any difficulties, you need to elaborate. What I don’t see you addressing here is why this should be more of a problem in the monorepo case (as it was implied in the email I was answering to). Your answer made it sound like you thought the monorepo would solve all downstream problems ("I don't know what you mean… I

Hi, This probably isn't significant evidence about using svn as the authoritative revision control system for llvm but more just to point out that the svn users tend to consider that the only thing one would use revision control for is the mainstream development history tracking. I'll note that I during working ("development" but also bug-fixing and experimentation) since the

On 20.08.2013, at 11:16, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to use LLVM svn (with svn 1.8.0), I'm currently seeing this: > > svn: E175004: The PROPFIND response did not include the requested properties > > Does anyone else have this problem? Seems to be a known bug in SVN 1.8.0, can you try upgrading to 1.8.1 or

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> > I think svn works better than git as an authoritative upstream >> >> Would you mind expanding on this? What problem specifically is being solved? Linus and Guido both use DVCS's and the authoritative upstream is whatever URL the BDFL says it is. > > Monotonic version

Hi, When I try to use LLVM svn (with svn 1.8.0), I'm currently seeing this: svn: E175004: The PROPFIND response did not include the requested properties Does anyone else have this problem? David

It looks like the Subversion migration is working. The CVS repository is still there, but in read-only mode. However, the SVN repository preserves the version history of the CVS repository, albeit organized slightly differently. For an introduction to Subversion, this online book is essential: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ It is written by some of the Subversion authors. The only drawback I

CentOS 6.4. We've got a subversion repo on a server. Currently, it's set to use krb5. Trouble is, the krb5.conf is set up to use pcscd authentication (using PIV cards). Whether anything else on the server needs it, it appears that when people issue certain svn commands (I haven't nailed down which), the thing tries to look at the pcscd.pid... and selinux complains that this is

Is there a simple way to bootstrap merb directly from the Subversion repository, rather than first installing it as a gem? I can do the following if I already have an old gem lying around: merb -g testapp # using an old gem cd testapp rake merb:freeze_from_svn Unfortunately, that means I''m using an old version of the generator. So for example, when I just tried this,

Hi all ! Could someone tell me what''s what in the Rails Engines Subversion repository ? There are many folders where the Rails Engine is located, and from the folder names alone, I can''t really guess what''s what. For example, the rails engine plugin is situated at: plugins/engine engines/trunk branches/engines branches/edge_engines From the log, I gather