Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog"
2013 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
>> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached patch file to update lit
2013 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
Hi,
Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>
> >On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> >> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
>
2013 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>
>> On 09/01/2013 08:02 PM, Star Tan wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached patch file to update lit config for Cloog. Without it, Polly always skips Cloog testings when we run "make check-polly".
>>
2013 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Update lit config for Cloog
Hi Sebastian, thanks for your reply!
At 2013-09-27 03:33:04,"Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:>Hi,
>
>Star Tan wrote:
>> At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>
>> >On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote:
>> >> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at
2012 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing
another patch that will adapt most of the current tests to work with
2012 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
>
> I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
> dependent on Cloog to be conditionally executed to CLOOG_FOUND. I am preparing
> another patch
2012 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Hi Tobi,
when polly is configured with isl and without cloog, make polly-test does not
pass cleanly as there are several testcases that use a pass flag that does not
exist in this configuration: -polly-cloog.
I was thinking to address this problem by renaming -polly-cloog and
-polly-codegen-isl to -polly-codegen and making all these tests using
-polly-codegen.
Another option is to disable these
2012 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012, at 06:01 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > > Another option is to disable these tests when cloog is not available, and to
> > > write other tests that will work with -polly-codegen-isl.
> >
> > I think I like this way better. The attached patches move all the test
> >
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] disabling cloog in llvm 3.4
Tobias,
Would it be possible to add a cmake option to disable the use of cloog in
the polly build for 3.4? Currently the toplevel CMakeLists.txt in polly has...
FIND_PACKAGE(Isl REQUIRED)
FIND_PACKAGE(Gmp REQUIRED)
FIND_PACKAGE(Cloog)
FIND_PACKAGE(Pluto)
with no cmake option to avoid executing...
FIND_PACKAGE(Cloog)
I have been deinstalling the fink cloog packages, so that
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >>Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
> >>test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
> >>cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
> >
> >I only know how to disable the test of a full
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
>> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
>> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
>
> I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can
> disable all the
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
I only know how to disable the test of a full directory, so if you want I can
disable all the CodeGen directory (and subdirectories) when Cloog is not
available. Note that
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >I can then move the remaining tests in Cloog/CodeGen and duplicate them in
> >Isl/CodeGen. What do you think?
>
> Fine with me (You probably just need to copy the remaining tests in
> the top level directory).
Ok, so I moved the OpenMP, GPGPU, and MemAccess dirs to the toplevel
polly/test/{OpenMP,GPGPU,MemAccess} and then the remaining testcases to
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 07:42 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 12/03/2012 06:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>> Regarding patch one and three: We already have the directory
>>>> test/CodeGen and test/IslCodeGen. I propose to just leave the CLooG test
>>>> cases in test/CodeGen, but to run them conditionally.
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
On 12/03/2012 09:03 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> I can then move the remaining tests in Cloog/CodeGen and duplicate them in
>>> Isl/CodeGen. What do you think?
>>
>> Fine with me (You probably just need to copy the remaining tests in
>> the top level directory).
>
> Ok, so I moved the OpenMP, GPGPU, and MemAccess dirs to the
2012 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] [polly] removing cloog dependence in the testsuite
Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 09:03 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >>>I can then move the remaining tests in Cloog/CodeGen and duplicate them in
> >>>Isl/CodeGen. What do you think?
> >>
> >>Fine with me (You probably just need to copy the remaining tests in
> >>the top level directory).
> >
>
2013 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Performance comparison between Cloog and ISL code generation
Hello all,
The performance comparison between Polly's Cloog and ISL code generator is posted on http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/59?compare_to=58&baseline=58
It seems their execution-time performance are comparable:
Performance Regressions - Execution Time (ISL over Cloog)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt 8.49%
2013 Nov 20
1
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:00:44PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> Tobias,
>>>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>>>
>>>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
2013 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Tobias,
>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>
>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
>> ===================================================================
>> --- CMakeLists.txt (revision 195142)
>> +++ CMakeLists.txt (working
2013 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] proposed patch to default to isl-only polly
On 11/20/2013 04:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07:18PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 08:50 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Tobias,
>>> Can we add something like the following to polly 3.4?
>>>
>>> Index: CMakeLists.txt
>>> ===================================================================