similar to: [LLVMdev] RFC: llvm-shlib-test (Was: [llvm] r191029 - llvm-c: Make LLVMGetFirstTarget a proper prototype)

I like the idea, but I find the name confusing; I think it should have `llvm-c` or `c-api` somewhere in the name. This could also serve as a simple example of using the API. -- Sean Silva On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Anders Waldenborg <anders at 0x63.nu> wrote: > Moving this to llvmdev. > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:26:41AM +0200, Anders Waldenborg wrote: > > >

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > I like the idea, but I find the name confusing; I think it should have > `llvm-c` or `c-api` somewhere in the name. This could also serve as a > simple example of using the API. I had it as llvm-c-test first, then noticed that the shared library's directory was named "llvm-shlib". Yes, making sure it serves as

I think having this would be awesome! On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Anders Waldenborg <anders at 0x63.nu> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: >> I like the idea, but I find the name confusing; I think it should have >> `llvm-c` or `c-api` somewhere in the name. This could also serve as a >> simple example of using the API. > > I

Attached is what I got thus far. What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:52:12PM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote: > The automatic generation of the Python ctypes interfaces using the Clang > Python bindings is pretty friggin cool! A nice side effect is that everything is added to the interface. So it is easy to add a small proxy over the lib that shows which parts of the llvm-c API that is exercised by the tests. (have that in my bindings)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Anders Waldenborg <anders at 0x63.nu> wrote: > > * Auto generated vs manual ctypes declarations. > This is purely a cosmetic difference, as we both take the same approach of registering functions on a global/shared ctypes library instance. I think automatic is the way to go (just as long as the automatically generated code is easy to diff when

At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:12:08 +0100, Christoph Grenz wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 21:15:02 schrieb Gregory Szorc: > > There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to > > LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find > > some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the >

Hi, I have a question regarding the metadata for compileunit debug info. I find a few things in it a bit strange, but maybe there it is a reason for it to be that way that I just don't understand (but if that is the case I guess the documentation needs to be clearer). Consider this C program: "int X;" Compiled with "clang -g" it debug metadata along these lines:

On 3/17/2012 4:14 PM, Anders Waldenborg wrote: > FYI: > > I've also been working on new python bindings. > > My bindings are written using ctypes (just like the in-tree > clang/cindex bindings). Most of Core.h is bound, and stuff from > ExecutionEngine.h, Analysis, BitReader, BitWriter. The have fairly > good test coverage (using nosetests). The ctypes definitions are

OK, I solved it all ( so far :) ), mixing in some load-instructions and called on the result of that, which worked. Here is the skeleton-code: %kernel = type { int ()* } int puts_kernel(){...} ; main() %theKernel = malloc %kernel %puts_kernelPTR = getelementptr %kernel* %theKernel, long 1, ubyte 0 store int ()* %puts_kernel, int ()** %puts_kernelPTR %tmp.11 = load int ()** %puts_kernelPTR

Hi guys, Not sure how to diagnose this problem however i have recently upgraded one of my schools sites from gentoo to freebsd which moved us from samba 3.0.14 to 3.0.21b and the first thing I noticed was when the students came to login if they all logged in at once the performance of login was crippled to a near standstill! As a test i swapped in the gentoo box and forced the upgrade to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1765 Summary: Error message if key not first in authorized_keys file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Anders Alexandersson wrote: > OK, I solved it all ( so far :) ), mixing in some load-instructions and > called on the result of that, which worked. > > Here is the skeleton-code: > > %kernel = type { int ()* } > > int puts_kernel(){...} > > ; main() > > %theKernel = malloc %kernel > %puts_kernelPTR = getelementptr %kernel* %theKernel,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1841 Summary: Error message if key not first in authorized_keys file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hello, Have wrestled this one for about a week, now, getting frustrated ;-) Running samba as PDC for my domain (cf. smb.conf further down) When logging in on my 2K Pro machine, I first get a "can't find roaming profile, attempting local profile"-error, but logon using my user's smb account accepts only the correct password and so the identification part works well. Next,

Does anyone know how to stress test samba without getting a whole room of people to login to all the computers at once ? perhaps some kind person has coded up a nice app that can be run on the server ?? just curious.. Kind Regards, Chris Anders Network Engineer Anders Networks Mobile - 0421 580 017 Email - chris@anders.net.au Web - http://www.anders.net.au ? --- This

Hello out there! I am trying to build a table of 2 function poiters by using an array: %kernel = alloca [ 2 x int ()* ] I try to access the first pointer to be able to store location of my first function like this: %function_pointer_1 = getelementptr [2 x int ()* ]* %kernel, long 0, long 0 store int ()* %function_1, int ()* %function_pointer_1 But, I get the error message from llvm-asm:

Hi, I am using LLVM 2.4 on a Linux RHEL5 machine. I was trying to figure out how the chaining of the alias analysis passes works in LLVM. Here are the command I used to test the chaining part. 1. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc -no-aa -anders-aa -licm Result: Anderson's AA and No Alias Analysis both are called. 2. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o

I can't figure out what's wrong with my config, I can see the share \\beata\anders, but not store0 or store1; # smb.conf is the main Samba configuration file. You find a full commented # version at /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/examples/smb.conf.SUSE if the # samba-doc package is installed. # Date: 2011-03-01 [global] workgroup = NORRBRING passdb backend = tdbsam

I have expanded the EWS calendar functionality within Asterisk 1.8 so it is now possible to access any calendar within an Exchange 2007 or 2010 server. I have put the changes onto the reviewboard for astrisk but currently no one responded. So if you use the EWS calendar functionality within Asterisk and would like to have access to any calendar in Exchange please try the patch in the