similar to: [LLVMdev] [GSoC] Flang's end of GSoC report

On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a >> report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in >> July: >>

On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: > > http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html > > Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! Wow, this is really fantastic

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>Hi everyone! > >> > >>Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a

----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi everyone! > > >> > >

On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a

I'd like to publicly congratulate Alex for his excellent work this summer! He worked diligently throughout the entire period, and he quite-successfully tackled an ambitious project. As a result, we now have a Fortran frontend for LLVM capable of compiling real packages (BLAS, LAPACK, etc.), and correctly executing the test suites for those packages. Thanks to Alex, and to Google, we now have a

On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers

On 09/24/13 12:16 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > >> On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone! >>>> >>>> Today is

Thanks for the responses! > I might be wrong (I'd love to be wrong here!) but I think this is a bit > too ambitious > You might be right about it being too ambitious, it would certainly be wise to aim for less. A more polished, but less broad product is definitely better than a buggy standard compliant one, and I think that it would go better with the general philosophy of GSoC. I

Hi again, I was studying and building the lfort repository as I said I would do, but after a while I decided that I would like to work on flang instead. So, I forked flang and so far I've had pretty good success with it, here's what I've done: - Merged a pull request from a github user Michael Gottesman(He added support for latest llvm and cmake) - Fixed character literal continuation

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your support. > I wrote my draft GSoC proposal, it can be viewed here - > https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 > Please read it and tell me what you think. Any criticisms or suggestions are > welcome! Hello Alex, > I plan to make flang a fully featured frontend which fully supports Fortran

Hi again. I've though more about the full standard being too ambitious, and now I fully agree with that. So I had a go at choosing the useful subset of Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be viewed at https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 . Focusing on less should also improve my productivity and lead to a better summer of code project by drastically reducing the

Hi Alex, You may want to check the later versions of the standard also to check if some of your proposal is not deprecated there. The most important thing in the Fortran standard is the array support and it is a big task by itself. In my opinion, the I/O part is not the most important thing yet it is an enormous task. Usually, the Fortran routines are used externally in other computation and I/O

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dmitri Gribenko" <gribozavr at gmail.com> > To: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:00:51 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GSoC project questions. > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Alex L <arphaman

> > No. I think that you might want to use Clang for inspiration on design, > but you'd certainly not be bound to that. If you'd like to take a much more > start-from-scratch approach, you can also look at the code that Bill put > together: https://github.com/isanbard/flang - If you use that as a base, > we can always merge it with the useful lfort pieces later. Ok,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing > List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing > List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 12:17:16

Thanks for your support. I wrote my draft GSoC proposal, it can be viewed here - https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 Please read it and tell me what you think. Any criticisms or suggestions are welcome! And I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have about the flang code > base. :-) > I actually do have a small question - could you tell me from what Fortran standard are the

Thanks, I'll take a look at it. It's actually a great idea, I completely missed that the fact that it's possible to do that. суббота, 4 мая 2013 г. пользователь Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> писал: > Hi, > > On 24/04/13 21:43, Alex L wrote: >> >> If you are going to work on improvements in this area, then it would >> help to add them to

Thanks for your replies. Working on the lfort compiler would certainly be an interesting project for me for this GSoC. I have studied lfort repository and commits, and I see that it has a lot of stuff for C/C++, am I correct that this is a fork of Clang? If this is correct, I wonder why this approach was chosen instead of starting out from scratch - is it because Clang already has a lot of code