similar to: [LLVMdev] ARMv5 buildbot

On 26 February 2013 16:14, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand your question. Fail tests continue to run so we > find out if they start passing as seems to be the case here. If llvm is now > free of whatever bugs caused these things to fail (ie: it's not just that > these stopped failing on this hardware but in all environments the

On Feb 26, 2013 2:13 AM, "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The llvm-arm-linux buildbot, although old, is up and running and the only failures I can see were XFAIL, but still being run on ARM: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/2158 > > Any ideas why they're still being run on that buildbot?

Hi folks, The llvm-arm-linux buildbot, although old, is up and running and the only failures I can see were XFAIL, but still being run on ARM: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/2158 Any ideas why they're still being run on that buildbot? If we can clear those, we can get it passing again. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On 07/23/2009 10:39 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Douglas Gregor<dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: >> >>> Greetings >>> >>> Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake >>> buildsysten. >>> I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I

On 08/26/2015 09:46 AM, Philip Reames wrote: > On 08/26/2015 09:41 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin >> <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: >> >> On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com >> <mailto:dblaikie at

Greetings Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake buildsysten. I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I would be interested if someone are running a cmake bot and if its build logs be observed online? If not, are there an easy way to setup a llvm cmake buildbot that can test the cmake build infrastructure for each commit? Cheers, and have a great day! Xerxes

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Douglas Gregor<dgregor at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > >> Greetings >> >> Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake >> buildsysten. >> I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I would be interested if >> someone are running a cmake bot and if

On Aug 27, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > I have recently set-up and installed a ARM buildbot Wonderful. It would be helpful to write up a bug report for the bits that don't work, and then to XFAIL them, so that the bot turns green. People watch mainly for the green to red transitions, and having it forever be red (orange) isn't as useful.

On 10/07/2015 02:44 PM, Eric Christopher via cfe-dev wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:24 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org > <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > > On 7 October 2015 at 22:14, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com > <mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> wrote: > > As a foreword: I haven't read a

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 17:39, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > *shrug* I haven't looked at whatever specific bots are under discussion, > but > > I really wouldn't mind/would like if the bots had a more "revert to > green" > > feel to them just

On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > Greetings > > Im interested to setup an automated buildbod that can test the cmake > buildsysten. > I use cmake for ARM cross compilation so I would be interested if > someone are running a cmake bot and if its build logs be observed > online? I don't know of anyone doing this now. > If not, are there an easy way

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 17:27, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > @Galina: It seems this bot is now almost permanently running into a > > compile-time > > timeout. Maybe you can fix this by either increasing the timeout or by > > switching to a

One strategy I use for our flaky bots is to have them email me only. If the failure is real, then I forward the email to who ever I find on the blame list. For a flaky build, this is least you can do. For our flaky builds I know how and why they are flaky, some person that gets email does not. This is also a great motivator to help me know what is wrong, and how to fix it. By default, all new

Hi Galina, The failing build was http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-mips/builds/10220 and the commit that caused it was 'r251331 [compiler-rt] Fix ptrace interceptor for aarch64'. ________________________________ From: Galina Kistanova [gkistanova at gmail.com] Sent: 02 November 2015 16:03 To: Daniel Sanders Cc: Renato Golin; Bill Seurer; LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev]

Folks, David has been particularly militant with broken buildbots recently, so to make sure we don't throw the baby with the bath water, I'd like to propose some changes on how we deal with the emails on our *current* buildmaster, since there's no concrete plans to move it to anything else at the moment. The main issue is that managing the buildbots is not a simple task. It requires

Hi Renato, >I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed >that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe >that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, >is that correct? >We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM >code is correct and don't regress, specially before releases (I

On 05/19/2015 10:40 AM, James Y Knight wrote: > Yes, I also find the amount of bot spam in #llvm is basically > intolerable. It makes it difficult to see actual people talking. At > first, I just put all the bots on /ignore. Now I have an xchat script > to move the botspam to another tab (tabify-004.pl > <http://tabify-004.pl/>). I'd recommend that the bots should just

On 6 February 2013 16:00, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: > Looking at the output from the a15 buildbot it looks like you are choosing > to do a "make clean". > I'm not choosing, this is the default "Clang" run. ;) If more people feel inclined to change the Clang build on all buildbots to use CMake / Ninja, I'm up for it, too. Galina, have

On 8 April 2011 11:21, Xerxes Rånby <xerxes at zafena.se> wrote: > Hope this will help fix the regressions Hi Xerxes, I see you're the owner of that board, thanks for the detailed description of the tests. By what you say, I think that the board itself is serving its purpose, and 2.9 only got that regression because it wasn't fixed it in time. My intention was to know what can

On 20 October 2014 18:03, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> Is that what you had in mind? > Yes, this looks good to me. Great, in r220210. I'll set up the bot. Thanks! --renato