similar to: [LLVMdev] An error when insert a function call in the IR

Hello group, Per my posting on the Clang Newsgroup. I'm interested in doing some loop optimizations, towards this end I would like to add some custom Metadata to a Loop header. Loops in LLVM are represented using BasicBlocks, but unfortunately you can NOT add MetaData to a BasicBlock. Although you can add Metadata to an instruction. So I'm proposing to add the Metadata manipulation

Hi , I understand that OPUS codec complexity can be varied from 0 - 10.Once the complexity varies there is a reduction in MIPS. I would like to understand what are the algorithmic changes that happens when the complexity varies . Is there any document that explains in detail the algorithm flow that changes when complexity varies, and the comparison of audio quality when the complexity varies.

Might have to do with GVN's PRE (partial redundancy elimination), which tends to increase code size. H. ----- Original Message ----- From: Abhinash Jain Sent: 09/22/13 01:17 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] Why total number of store instructions increased in case of gvn with reg2mem? Below are the 4 cases out of which for the first 3 cases am able to understand the variation

Hi Xerxes, It seems that your bot is broken for a while now, but doesn't look like a genuine LLVM error, maybe it just need some cleaning / re-configuring the build system? cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130922/165ebcf7/attachment.html>

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sid Manning <sidneym at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 09/20/2013 06:00 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Sid Manning <sidneym at codeaurora.org >> <mailto:sidneym at codeaurora.org**>> wrote: >> >> >> This example generates the following error: >> .Ltmp3: >>

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Slightly changed the example :- > > .section somedata > .Ltmpa: > .word 100 > .Ltmpb: > .word 60 > .Ltmpc: > .word 40 > .Ltmpd: > .word (.Ltmpa-.Ltmpb)-.Ltmpc > > The GNU assembler properly handles the above. > > $as -c x.s -o x.o >

On 22-09-13 10:31, lvqcl wrote: > I measured encoding speed of 24-bit WAV files. It turns out that 32-bit > encoder made by GCC is ~1.7x times slower than 32-bit encoder made by MSVS. Strange, I'm not able to reproduce your findings. I did found something rather odd though. I thought MSVC, ICL and GCC would produce the same files, but for some reason a GCC compile creates slightly

Hello,For the time being I am using the following line to play the original saved message by Asteriskexten => 7001,n,Playback(vm-nobodyavail)Now I am trying to use the other features for Asterisk's voicemail. I have recorded a message, and I can see it saved on the system, but still Asterisk keeps playing the original message... Is there something I can add to let the subscriber plays his

Hi Eli, Slightly changed the example :- .section somedata .Ltmpa: .word 100 .Ltmpb: .word 60 .Ltmpc: .word 40 .Ltmpd: .word (.Ltmpa-.Ltmpb)-.Ltmpc The GNU assembler properly handles the above. $as -c x.s -o x.o $readelf -x 4 x.o Hex dump of section 'somedata': NOTE: This section has relocations against it, but these have NOT been applied to this dump. 0x00000000 64003c00

hi, LLVM, I found there is a flag DisableHazardRecognizer in TargetInstrImpl.cpp. I still don't understand how llvm detects data hazard in pre-RA-sched. pre-RA-sched is based on SDNode and all operands are vregs. Even you can calculate the operators of SDNodes, the data hazard in vreg are not same as physical register data hazard. Is it useful to optimize processor pipeline? thanks, --lx

Hello, include <iostream>#include <string>#include <xapian.h>struct document{ std::string title; std::string content; std::string url;}; void indexData(document d) { try { Xapian::WritableDatabase db("/Users/ramesh/Desktop/xapian", Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN); Xapian::TermGenerator indexer; Xapian::Stem

Hello, include <iostream>#include <string>#include <xapian.h>struct document{ std::string title; std::string content; std::string url;}; void indexData(document d) { try { Xapian::WritableDatabase db("/Users/ramesh/Desktop/xapian", Xapian::DB_CREATE_OR_OPEN); Xapian::TermGenerator indexer; Xapian::Stem

I managed to make it work by cloning code from lli and making my own cpp wrapper. 2013/9/22 Konstantin Olkhovskiy <lupus at oxnull.net> > Hi List, > > I'm trying to upgrade our llvm-c based compiler from JIT to MCJIT. > While trying to do so I encountered several problems. Looks like C > API does not have proper functions to intialize LLVM with MCJIT. > I ended up

Hi List, I'm trying to upgrade our llvm-c based compiler from JIT to MCJIT. While trying to do so I encountered several problems. Looks like C API does not have proper functions to intialize LLVM with MCJIT. I ended up wrapping the following functions in my own init routine. LLVMInitializeX86TargetInfo(); LLVMInitializeX86Target(); LLVMInitializeX86TargetMC(); LLVMInitializeX86AsmPrinter();

Hi List, My IR compiles fine and runs. I've tried to add DebugIR pass so as to be able to debug and profile it (since source is an SQL query all that I can debug and profile is IR itself). When I tried to add it to pass manager I got the following assert: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff3fe4425 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at

Hi Tobias, At 2013-09-19 22:59:25,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/19/2013 04:46 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> >> I am trying to move Polly later. >> >> >> LLVM provides some predefined ExtensionPointTy: >> EP_EarlyAsPossible, >> EP_ModuleOptimizerEarly, >>