similar to: [LLVMdev] CMake problem of LLVM 3.3

Hi Xun, On 16/09/13 03:42, Xun Chen wrote: > Hi, Guys: > > I'm new for LLVM. Just downloaded the LLVM. > I used cmake to compiler the LLVM3.3, but found an error, because it can > not automatically compiler the target description file (*.td) to the .inc file. > But when I tried the LLVM 3.2, It is ok. > Could your give me some suggestion? your description

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:47 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 3/31/11 8:39 PM, Xun Li wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I am working on a custom defined architecture which implements Sparc >> ISA but without floating point instructions. >> I have two questions regarding using LLVM: >> 1. How to enable soft-float when building

Hello, today I download poolalloc from " https://github.com/llvm-mirror/poolalloc". and I compiled it with LLVM3.3. Then when I excute "make",I get the error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:18:30:fatal error:llvm/IR/CallSite.h: No such file or directory. ​I correct the path of callsite.h to "llvm/Support/Callsite.h". there is another error: AddressTakenAnalysis.cpp:In

The documentation is correct, and the observation that the IR verifier is currently not verifying this property is also correct. Due to the way that dbg.declares are handled by later stages, LLVM can only keep track of one dbg.declare per variable and that is intentional. The dbg.declare intrinsic is supposed to pin a variable to a stack slot, such as in the code that clang emits at -O0. If you

This buildbot has been failing for over a week straight ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-mips/builds/9387 ) - does anyone know/care about it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:49 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>, Ahmed Bougacha

Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

Greetings, I've been using LLVM and Clang for some time, but I'm new to the list and new to VMKit; please advise if I should post this elsewhere. VMKit doesn't seem to build with LLVM/Clang 3.4.2 -- seems that one must use LLVM3.3. I see the following error: VmkitGCPrinter.cpp:363:53: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3

Hi, In the LLVM documentation it says "there can only be one call to llvm.dbg.declare for a given concrete local variable." However we don't seem to be checking it. opt tool can process IR that violates this rule without complaining. Is this intended, or is it a bug? What would be the consequence when this constraint is broken? -- Xun

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > I do. I'll take a look. > > Is there a way for owners to get emails for long-lasting failures? > I'm not sure what the generic setup is, but at least for the builder/slave I admin, it emails me on every failure. So I get a lot of mail, continuously, if there's a consistent

I've just noticed that this is a new test added in r248325 and has never passed on this builder. Added the author of the test (Evgeniy). From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev Sent: 01 October 2015 20:34 To: David Blaikie Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips > > I do. I'll take

Hi All, I am working on a custom defined architecture which implements Sparc ISA but without floating point instructions. I have two questions regarding using LLVM: 1. How to enable soft-float when building llvm-gcc? 2. How to let llvm-gcc generate native code (binaries) for Sparc? Do I have to compile glibc or newlib for Sparc and link with it together? I am kinda confused so it would be great

On 2020-05-08 2:58 p.m., Xun Li wrote: > Eli, > Yes I was referring to AllCallsAreTailCalls. I will take a look at how > to improve this. > > Nick, > Thanks. I agree that's the proper constrain to mark a call as > tailcall, however not being able to mark a call as tailcall shouldn't > completely kill TCE. (i.e. AllCallsAreTailCalls seems overly > limiting). I

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Haishan > Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3 > My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. > //test.c > int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} > int main() { >  a[0] = a[5]; >  a[1] = a[4]; >  a[2] = a[5]; > } > //end test.c > Then test.dump is

At 2013-12-15 22:43:34,"Caldarale, Charles R" <Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com> wrote: >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Haishan >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3 > >> My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. > >> //test.c >> int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

The flag -enable-aa-sched-mi should do what you want you want in the MachineScheduler pass. If you want to do it in the selection DAG, there is a subtarget hook that might do it: TargetSubtargetInfo::useAA() LLVM won’t generate the schedule you want anyway for Intel core processors, but the alias analysis can be useful in general. -Andy On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at

Hi, I was looking into the implementation of TailRecursionElimination, and noticed that we have the constrain that if any call uses a local, even though it doesn't capture the local, it would still prohibit TCE. This contain seems unnecessary and overly limiting? Relevant code is here:

Thanks. From the debugging I've done so far it looks like it could be another 32-bit big-endian specific bug. It seems to be segfaulting in the memset() in allocate_stack.c (from glib) because given stack pointer is null. I'm guessing this is because it read the wrong half of a 64-bit value somewhere but I haven't identified where it goes wrong. ________________________________________

Hi, Since LLVM does not contain an assembler and linker to generate native code, do people have to write their own assembler if the target is different from the host? Or did I misunderstand something? Thanks. Xun Li ArchLab Department of Computer Science University of California, Santa Barbara

On 3/31/11 8:39 PM, Xun Li wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on a custom defined architecture which implements Sparc > ISA but without floating point instructions. > I have two questions regarding using LLVM: > 1. How to enable soft-float when building llvm-gcc? There might be an option when configuring llvm-gcc. Check the GCC docs to see if such an option exists. Maybe

Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/Backend/compiler_backe nd/ But Beignet does not