Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Extracting libmachine from libcodegen (bug 1121)"
2013 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting libmachine from libcodegen (bug 1121)
On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Ken Dyck <kd at kendyck.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the long-standing code clean-up bugs in Bugzilla is to extract
> the Machine* code from the CodeGen library into a separate one, on
> which CodeGen depends (
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1121).
>
> I'd like to start working on this. The general approach I'm planning
2013 Sep 12
2
[LLVMdev] Extracting libmachine from libcodegen (bug 1121)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>
> If that is the goal, then you only want the modules for Machine IR, and maybe some core analysis passes. The “Machine” modules you listed above include machine code analysis or transform passes that you probably don’t want. Pruning the list to basic IR support:
>
>> - MachineBasicBlock
>> -
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] Extracting libmachine from libcodegen (bug 1121)
Hi,
I did the Pass ID workaround by providing Passes.h in the
include/llvm/Machine. But the question which is holding me up is that, as
Ken Dyck was kind enough to point out, what should be done to the dependency
on libAnalysis? The Machine passes are not only dependent on Passes class
but also on others such as the ConstantFolding.h. Is it a possible solution
to break this dependency or carry
2010 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] CMake "sudo make install" & headers
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Samuel Williams
<space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might just be doing something stupid, but when I do
>
> $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
> $ sudo make install
>
> I don't get the expected headers in
> /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm
>
> It is
2010 Mar 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Before/After IR Dumps
David Greene wrote:
> Here's a rework using PassManager as Chris suggested. Comments?
Tried this second patch with the svn version 97812 (the one the patch is
made against), but it doesn't compile:
"llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:127: Error: expected unqualified-id before "&"
token"
Seems raw_ostream is forward declared but not defined (adding a missing
#include
2012 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] Move TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo into libCodeGen
Hi,
Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen?
TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most shared functionality. The lib/Target/TargetInstrInfo.cpp file has two remaining functions that happen to not depend on libCodeGen, but I don't think they serve any purpose as part of libTarget.
2012 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] Move TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo into libCodeGen
On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
> Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen?
>
> TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most shared functionality. The lib/Target/TargetInstrInfo.cpp file has two remaining functions that happen
2012 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Move TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo into libCodeGen
On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>>> Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen?
2012 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] Move TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo into libCodeGen
On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote:
>> Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen?
>>
>> TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most
2010 Mar 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Before/After IR Dumps
On Friday 12 March 2010 08:13:05 Kalle Raiskila wrote:
> David Greene wrote:
> > Here's a rework using PassManager as Chris suggested. Comments?
>
> Tried this second patch with the svn version 97812 (the one the patch is
> made against), but it doesn't compile:
> "llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:127: Error: expected unqualified-id before "&"
>
2007 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Antony Blakey wrote:
> SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on
> MSYS/MINGW, using the following files:
Ok, I tried to do the same. The compilations stops with the following
error message (actually, I got to the same point in my attempt to build
LLVM with the MinGW compiler shipped with Cygwin):
llvm[1]: Compiling MachineLoopInfo.cpp for Debug build
2007 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] MachineLoopInfo Analysis Not Done
I'm trying to create the Machine LICM pass and I have this defined:
class VISIBILITY_HIDDEN MachineLICM : public MachineFunctionPass {
...
public:
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired<MachineLoopInfo>();
AU.addRequired<MachineDominatorTree>();
}
...
};
But when I go to use it:
2010 Sep 30
6
[LLVMdev] CMake "sudo make install" & headers
Hi,
I might just be doing something stupid, but when I do
$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
$ sudo make install
I don't get the expected headers in
/usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm
It is simply an empty directory.
What am I doing wrong? This is on Mac OS X, CMake 2.8+
Kind regards,
Samuel
2010 Mar 14
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Before/After IR Dumps
On Mar 12, 2010, at 8:10 AM, David Greene wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2010 08:13:05 Kalle Raiskila wrote:
>> David Greene wrote:
>>> Here's a rework using PassManager as Chris suggested. Comments?
>>
>> Tried this second patch with the svn version 97812 (the one the patch is
>> made against), but it doesn't compile:
>>
2007 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
SVN head LLVM and Clang built out of the box for me a week ago on MSYS/
MINGW, using the following files:
MinGW-5.1.3.exe
MSYS-1.0.10.exe
msysDTK-1.0.1.exe
bash-3.1-MSYS-1.0.11-1.tar.bz2
bison-2.3-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
coreutils-5.97-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2
flex-2.5.33-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
gawk-3.1.5-MSYS-1.0.11-snapshot.tar.bz2
regex-0.12-MSYS-1.0.11.tar.bz2
1. install these components
2.
2007 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] MachineLoopInfo Analysis Not Done
On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> I'm trying to create the Machine LICM pass and I have this defined:
>
> But when I go to use it:
>
> bool MachineLICM::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
> ...
> // Get our Loop information...
> LI = &getAnalysis<MachineLoopInfo>();
> ...
> for (MachineLoopInfo::iterator
2010 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] Find all backedges of CFG by MachineDominatorTree. please look at my jpg.
Hi:
I want to do some optimization on MachineLoop.
So I want to get MachineLoopInfo from MachineFunction.
I reference MachineLICM.cpp.
So I try to write a pass in Target/mytarget directory.
I find there is Error.
llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:198: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*) const [with AnalysisType = llvm::MachineLoopInfo]: Assertion
2016 Feb 11
3
Writing an LLVM Pass that depends on mem2reg
Hi,
I read your post in LLVM forum. I want to use getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) to get MachineLoopInfo. I have used this on my passes before but, this time I am trying to get this information in ScheduleDAGRRList scheduler class. There is no runonmachinefunction function. Do you know how I can implement this?
Regards,
Fateme
I will appreciate it you can help me with this problem.
2007 Nov 28
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM on MinGW
Hello,
I'm trying to use LLVM on Windows, using the MinGW toolchain that comes
with Cygwin (gcc -mno-cygwin, not the standalone msys package). Has
anyone successfully built LLVM from sources with this toolchain?
The ./configure scripts automatically detects a Cygwin environment. I've
spent some time trying to let it know that it should compile for MinGW.
FWIW, here's what I've
2015 Sep 03
2
LiveInterval and Loop Info
Hello to all LLVM Developers.
Given a object from a LiveInterval class, is there any way to know if this
Live Interval is part or is inside a loop?
Att
--
Natanael Ramos
Membro do corpo discente de Ciência da Computação pelo Instituto Federal de
Minas Gerais - Campus Formiga
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: