similar to: [LLVMdev] Disabling special treatment of "malloc" function

Hi Chris, > For now I've added a flag to MDA such that malloc clobbers rather than > resolving to undef; however I was wondering if there is a "proper" way to do > this with any compiler targeting LLVM? Clang has an option "-fno-builtin" that disables such assumptions (by adding the attribute "nobuiltin" to the relevant callsites by the looks of it). Is

On 08/09/13 16:36, Tim Northover wrote: > >> For now I've added a flag to MDA such that malloc clobbers rather than >> resolving to undef; however I was wondering if there is a "proper" way to do >> this with any compiler targeting LLVM? > Clang has an option "-fno-builtin" that disables such assumptions (by > adding the attribute

On May 15, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> Initially, I'm just concerned about keeping the optimizations we already perform, such as globalopt lowering a new/delete pair into a global, while disabling the non-conforming variations of those optimizations. But we're also permitted to merge multiple allocations into one if they have

On May 16, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Since it would probably help to quantify the complexity increase, I've implemented my more recent suggestion (patch attached). This patch allows 'nobuiltin' on a function declaration or definition, and adds a 'builtin' attribute which can only be present on a call site for a

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 15, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Initially, I'm just concerned about keeping the optimizations we already >>> perform, such as globalopt lowering a new/delete pair into a global, while >>> disabling the non-conforming

On Fri Apr 02 00:37:03 +0200 2010, Trevor Harmon wrote: > On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > > Others, like MemoryDependenceAnalysis, are "lazy." MDA > > specifically does NOT compute results in its runOnFunction(), > > instead computing results on-demand when a user queries it. Because > > MDA depends on AA, we must ensure that, as long as

On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Some analyses, like Andersen's AA, do all their computation in their > runOnFunction(). Therefore, anything they depended on can be > destroyed after the runOnFunction() returns. What about AA itself? Would addRequired<AliasAnalysis> keep AliasAnalysis alive (but allow AliasAnalysis's dependencies to die)? >

Hello. First, I want to thank those responsible for Dovecot IMAP as it was a real treat to implement in comparison to my mostly-failed attempts with Cyrus. The passwd-file authentication was exactly what I needed as I really didn't want to have to deal with PAM or LDAP but where I am setting up a server with virtual accounts. I'm using Postfix as an MTA, and it quite handily passes

Hi, Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 Dovecot 2.3.1 Pigeonhole 0.5.1 Mailflow is OpenSMTPd as MTA, using mda delivery to rspamc which utlimately delivers using dovecot-lda. smtpd.conf deliver to mda "rspamc -h scan --mime -e

On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote: > I'm a bit confused about the distinction between addRequired and > addRequiredTransitive in AnalysisUsage. From PassAnalysisSupport.h: > > "REQUIRES (must be available when the pass runs), REQUIRES TRANSITIVE > (must be available throughout the lifetime of the pass)." > > The part that's confusing me

deliver is the binary name. but it's configured inside protocol lda {} section. This is getting annoying, any thoughts on what would be a good unifying name? a) deliver binary, protocol deliver {} b) lda binary, protocol lda {} c) dovecot-lda binary, protocol lda {} d) mda binary, protocol mda {} e) dovecot-mda binary, protocol mda {} f) something else? In any case protocol lda {} would

Our asterisk server has been up and running for over a year and it works great. I have emails going to my account as an attachment and I can listen to them on the desktop and it works fine. I just got a T-Mobile MDA that runs Windows Pocket (or whatever they call it) and it can check email. If I have it download the email, it gets the attachment, but it can't seem to play it (it CAN

Hello; I was trying to use the computeArraySize() function from the MemoryBuiltins.cpp file. It requires two arguments DataLayout *TD and const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI. Can anyone tell me how to get the TargetLibraryInfo? I am getting the DataLayout using: DataLayout *TD; TD = new DataLayout(&M); I hope that's the right way of getting it. Thanks a lot; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya

Hello, I'm preparing to convert from qpopper + UW-IMAP to dovecot. So far testing has gone very well. One problem we haven't figured out is that long-running POP sessions keep the mailbox locked, so that the MDA times out while trying to deliver. We're using "maildrop" as our MDA if that matters. We don't see this issue for dovecot IMAP sessions. During long-running

For a private package ("soon" to be on CRAN), I started looking at and thinking about the function confusion() from the mda package and wondered if it wouldn't make sense to provide the generic function in base R and also think about making the default for the `true' argument equal to fitted(object). One could write methods for confusion() for almost all classifiers which

Hi. Even new mails delivered by my MDA don't get the ,S= and ,W= fields set... (but when I "upload" a mail via IMAP to dovecot, they are set) Is there some place in dovecot where I need to enable this? Or would it be the MDA that has to calculate and set this already when placing a file in ./new? Thanks, Chris. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hi Stephan, On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Stephan Bosch wrote: > LMTP currently does not support AUTH. Bummer. Thought so. > What is your use case? Most people hide LMTP behind a firewall, or don't > expose it through TCP/IP in the first place. The port is currently only available to a few trusted machines, but having auth available would have been a nice benefit in case the firewall

I'm trying to use mars{mda} to model functions that look fairly close to a sequence of straight line segments. Unfortunately, 'mars' seems to totally miss the obvious places for the knots in the apparent first order spline model, and I wonder if someone can suggest a better way to do this. The following example consists of a slight downward trend followed by a jump up after

Hello, I currently have one machine running postfix SMTP server as MTA along with dovecot IMAP server for email. Although it only supports a handful of users, email service is important to us all; so I'm looking to make this a more fault-tolerant / highly-available system. To that end, I'm planning on configuring postfix to use deliver/dovecot-lda as my MDA (using procmail at the

Hi, I'm using mda library to solve a discriminant analysis. I get results, but the thing is that I want to use Fisher's method to obtain the classification functions and I'm lost in what I should do: libraries to use, ... Can anybody give me a clue?? Thanks. Carlos Niharra L??pez