similar to: [LLVMdev] COFF.h and windows.h conflict

IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF documentation is a feature, not a bug. The elf and macho headers in the same directory use the standard enumeration names, correct? On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that if include\llvm\Support is included alongside Windows.h, > there will be many

Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF documentation > is a feature, not a bug. > > The elf and

It was happening in a few files using COFF.h in LLDB for the windows branch (Windows.h is required for some typedef over Mutex, thread, socket, etc...). As said before, I am currently checking if it could be avoided (probably some refactoring will be needed). However I was wondering if it might not be easier to just avoid this clash at all by avoiding it in LLVM. Alternatively I could #undef

In the Windows SDK headers, is the IMAGE_* defines in a separate file (e.g. winint.h)? Does the file have a guard against multiple inclusion? If so (and the guard was named _WINNT_H_), perhaps you can do something like: #define _WINNT_H_ #include <windows.h> So you would get everything except those file format defines. Of course, this would fail if other parts of the windows header rely

The odds of #define _WINNT_H working are incredibly slim :) You can't include the separate headers (winbase.h etc), you have to just include windows.h Windows defines IMAGE_* whether we like it or not, we can't stop it doing it, so the only reasonable solution is to change LLVM to have it's own set of constant names. Nick Kledzik wrote: > In the Windows SDK headers, is the

Right now, we have: In COFF.h: class COFF { enum MachineTypes { IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN = 0x0, ... }; }; In windows.h: #define IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN 0 * If you first include COFF.h and then windows.h, COFF::IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN will be preprocessed into COFF:0. * If you first include Windows.h and then COFF.h, COFF.h won't work because it's enum will

On Aug 28, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote: > Right now, we have: > In COFF.h: > class COFF { enum MachineTypes { IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN = 0x0, ... }; }; > In windows.h: > #define IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN 0 > > * If you first include COFF.h and then windows.h, > COFF::IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN > will be

On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. > It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). I too am in the camp that it is a feature to use the standard names. For instance doing a search it google or

Hello, In my LLVM frontend (CLR/MSIL), I am currently using first-class aggregates to represent loaded value types on the "CLR stack". However, I noticed that when calling external method taking those aggregate by value, they were not passed as I expected: %COLORREF = type { i8, i8, i8, i8 } declare i32 @SetLayeredWindowAttributes(i8*, %COLORREF, i8, i32) I call this function with

Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> writes: > IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF > documentation is a feature, not a bug. *defining* (not *using*) symbols already defined on a platform header is definitely a bug.

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> writes: > > > IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF > > documentation is a feature, not a bug. > > *defining* (not *using*) symbols already defined on a platform header is > definitely a bug. We have to provide definitions so

Hello, As part of a MSIL (i.e. C#) to LLVM frontend I am currently working on ( https://github.com/xen2/SharpLang ), I would need some help/hint about how to properly design "PInvoke callbacks". Through "PInvoke" mechanism .NET allows you to call C functions, i.e.: C#: [DllImport("libc.so")] extern void mempcy(void* dest, void* src, int size); // declaration of C

I'm copying some LLD code into my codebase like this: // workaround for LLD not exposing ability to convert .def to .lib #include <set> namespace lld { namespace coff { class SymbolBody; class StringChunk; struct Symbol; struct Export { StringRef Name; // N in /export:N or /export:E=N StringRef ExtName; // E in /export:E=N SymbolBody *Sym = nullptr; uint16_t Ordinal

Hi How can I have the tests for my Rails app to be executed in a random order? Is there a simple solution using rake? I already posted my question to stackoverflow (http:// stackoverflow.com/questions/1376267/ruby-executing-tests-in-a-random- order-with-rake) but the few responses I got were not able to solve the problem. Thanks a lot! Pietro Di Bello

Dear R users, As a new comer to R, I would like to create a new variable using if statements but don't know how to do it. Basically, I have two variables (EvHint and MinTex). I want to create a third variable called RiskTest. In SPSS, my syntax would look like Compute RiskTest=0. if (EvHint=1 & MinTex=1) RiskTest=1. Question: How do I do this with R? My Data EvHint<-c(0, 0, 0, 1,

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <r-help-owner@r-project.org> Date: 2013/2/8 Subject: vegdist Error en double(N * (N - 1)/2) : tama?o del vector especificado es muy grande To: caro.bello58@gmail.com Message rejected by filter rule match ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- From: caro bello <caro.bello58@gmail.com> To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013

Hi, I need to use the grant table mechanism, but I can''t find any example regarding how to do it. Could you please provide some examples? Thanks Carlo -- È molto più bello sapere qualcosa di tutto, che sapere tutto di una cosa. Blaise Pascal _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, How can I map llvm variables (virtual registers) to their runtime locations (register/stack location)? Thank you. Regards, Abbey. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101021/1440ee33/attachment.html>

Hi all! On http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.adv-filter.html I read that a classifiers available bases the decision on how the firewall has marked the packet and on http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html the following example: "tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 handle 6 fw flowid 1:1" "iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 6" My

Hi, I have some images and I want to be able to drag them into the order I want and have the database updated accordingly. I have an unordered list elsewhere in the application that works well, but for the images I cant get it working. In my controller I have: def updateorder params[:images].each_with_index { |id,idx| ProductImage.update(id, :display_order => idx) } render :text