similar to: [LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang"

2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang
On 08/15/2013 10:29 PM, Henrique Santos wrote: > I used the suite with clang 3.3 a few months ago. > If I remember correctly, I ran into the same error seen here: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036013.html > Although it doesn't seem to be a problem with the frontend, adding > -std=gnu89, as suggested, fixed everything for me. > H. -std=gnu89 is
2013 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang
On 16 August 2013 20:02, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > -std=gnu89 is not valid for c++ > I think the point here is that this is the default std for GCC but not Clang, so you have to force clang to behave like GCC. For C++, you'll have to force whatever default GCC has for it's C++ standard. Though, GCC 4.8 is getting very close to Clang's behaviour, so
2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang
On 08/16/2013 01:42 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 16 August 2013 20:02, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > -std=gnu89 is not valid for c++ > > > I think the point here is that this is the default std for GCC but not > Clang, so you have to force clang to behave like GCC. For C++, you'll > have to force
2013 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] running spec2006 with clang
Has anyone been running this? Do you need to use one of the -std= or -ansi or whatever to set the language conformance level of clang to match some assumed gcc level? Tia. Reed
2013 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] [MIPS] How can I add a constraint to LLVM/Clang for MIPS BE?
Hi Jack, On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jack Carter <Jack.Carter at imgtec.com> wrote: > Jia, > > I made what I believe to be the correct changes and rebuilt clang and llc. Are the results what you expected? I so I will prepare the patches for commitment. > > Jack > > clang ../mips_R_JiaLiu.c -o mips_R_JiaLiu.ll -emit-llvm -O3 -S -target mipsel-unknown-linux -std=gnu89
2013 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] [MIPS] How can I add a constraint to LLVM/Clang for MIPS BE?
Maybe try: .set noat AT is needed to create certain instructions from pseudo instructions, so you have to be careful how you use this. Some instructions that you can use in Mips assembler are in fact pseudos. While AT is not available to it (.set noat), the assembler can not assemble certain pseudos for you. On 03/03/2013 06:02 PM, Jia Liu wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013
2015 Apr 16
2
[LLVMdev] Compile SPEC2006 with clang-3.2, multi definition errors.
When compile 403.gcc, there are link errors. 1) environment 1.1) OS Linux gnode107 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux *1.2) The default GCC compiler is * gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for
2016 Aug 12
3
AutoFDO sample profiles v. SelectInst,
I am looking for advice on a problem observed with -fprofile-sample-use for samples built with the AutoFDO tool I took the "hmmer" benchmark out of SPEC2006 It is initially compiled clnag++ -o hmmer -O3 -std=gnu89 -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -fno-strict-aliasing -w -g *.c This baseline binary runs in about 164.2 seconds as reported by "perf stat" We build a sample file from this
2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] workflow for linking clang
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > the good news is that (thanks to Simon) the clang driver is working so > well for Mips now that we are more or less switching away from using llc > during development for all our various host/target configurations. > > the bad news is that we have make clang all the time and it is really slow > to
2013 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] workflow for linking clang
On 08/16/2013 02:13 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > the good news is that (thanks to Simon) the clang driver is > working so well for Mips now that we are more or less switching > away from using llc during development for all our various >
2013 Aug 16
5
[LLVMdev] workflow for linking clang
the good news is that (thanks to Simon) the clang driver is working so well for Mips now that we are more or less switching away from using llc during development for all our various host/target configurations. the bad news is that we have make clang all the time and it is really slow to do that. we used to be able to just make in the lib/target/Mips and then in llc and it was really fast.
2018 Jun 05
1
[PATCH v2 2/2] x86: paravirt: make native_save_fl extern inline
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers at google.com> wrote: > > The semantics of extern inline has changed since gnu89. This means that > folks using GCC versions >= 5.1 may see symbol redefinition errors at > link time for subdirs that override KBUILD_CFLAGS (making the C standard > used implicit) regardless of this patch. This has been cleaned up
2017 Feb 18
2
[RFC] Using Intel MPX to harden SafeStack
On 2/7/2017 20:02, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > ... > > My understanding is that BNDCU is the cheapest possible instruction, > just like XOR or ADD, > so the overhead should be relatively small. > Still my guesstimate would be >= 5% since stores are very numerous. > And such overhead will be on top of whatever overhead SafeStack has. > Do you have any measurements to
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:57 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at
2015 Mar 19
4
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
Well, you are an mclinker contributor and Google uses mclinker and now it's broken as the result of your change. I still don't see any justification to making a change in a public interface that is used by other non LLVM projects to fix some issue with clang warnings. People should be able to derive from those classes. I can't understand your reasoning as to why these classes must
2015 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Final added to parser<bool>
On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > Well, you are an mclinker contributor > > > Me personally? Not that I know of. Sorry. I thought i had seen your name in an mclinker commit. > > and Google uses mclinker >
2014 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] lowering and non legal types in fast-isel
I understand that but falling back makes the compilation slower. I'm wondering what could be done to remove this restriction about fast-isel not being able to handle non legal types. ________________________________________ From: Anton Korobeynikov [anton at korobeynikov.info] Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:55 AM To: Reed Kotler Cc: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] lowering
2014 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] ptrtoint
If you can't make an executable test from C or C++ code then how do you know something works. Just by examination of the .s? On 09/30/2014 03:18 PM, Reed Kotler wrote: > If I wanted to call this function that they generated by hand, from C or > C+ code, how would that be done? > > if have seen cases where a real boolean gets generated but it was > something fairly involved.
2014 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] configure with clang vs gcc
I see what my problem is here.... I'll continue to move further. Seems like Richards fix is still okay. On 02/25/2014 02:42 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 02:38 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: