similar to: [LLVMdev] subdirectory in test-suite for target dependent scripts

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Reed Kotler" <rkotler at mips.com> > Cc: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 6:30:56 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] adding a target dependent transform pass > > On 04/02/2013 03:31 PM, Reed Kotler wrote: > > On 04/02/2013 03:00 PM, reed kotler wrote: > >> How do you add a target dependent

On 04/02/2013 03:31 PM, Reed Kotler wrote: > On 04/02/2013 03:00 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> How do you add a target dependent transform pass? >> >> tia. >> >> eed > > I need to add a module pass. Do you need to just add them to the Transform subdirectory????

On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I

I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. > > On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> The first

On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I

I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. > The patch has been approved. > > What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all that we > have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the > commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just

On 11/07/2011 02:29 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross >> using Qemu. >> >> We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS >> before putting back. >> Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM

when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > The first one failed on a diff: > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: >

On 12/12/2012 10:18 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". > > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. >> The patch has been

On 03/19/2015 08:55 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Reed Kotler <Reed.Kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:Reed.Kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > One could argue that mclinker is doing something good or not by > how it's using this class > but I don't see the need for parser<bool> to be final. That is a >

We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross using Qemu. We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS before putting back. Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM and other targets that are supported by QEMU. But in this case, we would need to check in a version of QEMU and also the needed pieces of a MIPS tool chain for assembly,

Well, you are an mclinker contributor and Google uses mclinker and now it's broken as the result of your change. I still don't see any justification to making a change in a public interface that is used by other non LLVM projects to fix some issue with clang warnings. People should be able to derive from those classes. I can't understand your reasoning as to why these classes must

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > We have a modified version of projects/test-suite that we can run cross > using Qemu. > > We would like to put that back so that other people can test MIPS > before putting back. > Well, this would be easily modifiable for ARM and other targets that are > supported by QEMU. > > But in this

On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > Well, you are an mclinker contributor > > > Me personally? Not that I know of. Sorry. I thought i had seen your name in an mclinker commit. > > and Google uses mclinker >

On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:24 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at

On 03/19/2015 09:57 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Reed Kotler <reed.kotler at imgtec.com > <mailto:reed.kotler at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > On 03/19/2015 09:38 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Reed Kotler >> <reed.kotler at imgtec.com <mailto:reed.kotler at

I would like to add some Mips specific tests to test-suite. Is there a way to do that? So they would only run when running the test-suite on a mips target. Tia. Reed

On 02/24/2014 04:42 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:40 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> I need to leave soon and will take a look in the morning. >> >> I did look at the autoconf input files configure.ac >> >> There is a disable-zlib but not a disable-valgrind, even though it seems >> like there used to be.

I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. The patch has been approved. What is the best way to run it in order to get maximum coverage and have results where I can tell that I have not regressed anything (as well as the test-suite can help with that)? I've already tested it against the Mips compiler but we have a slightly