similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM (opt) -profile-verifier is not pass resilient

I thought this would be simple, but I just cant seem to get it to work. # only allow numbers. Need to check for nil / NAN def saveHours(val) if val < 0 val = 0 end return val end current_item.product.v1 = checkValue(values[:val1]) current_item.product.v2 = checkValue(values[:val2]) but when I run the code, nothing is ever returned from the checkValue function.

Hi, I have a problem with the following scenario: I use the ProfileEstimatorPass to get ProfileInfo and verifiy this info with the ProfileVerifierPass. (Please bear with me, its not about the profiling but about the Pass interaction.) Then the LowerSetJumpPass is executed and I want to verify that the esimtated ProfileInfo survives this pass by calling again the ProfileVerifierPass. This is what

Hi, I have a problem with the following scenario: I use the ProfileEstimatorPass to get ProfileInfo and verifiy this info with the ProfileVerifierPass. (Please bear with me, its not about the profiling but about the Pass interaction.) Then the LowerSetJumpPass is executed and I want to verify that the esimtated ProfileInfo survives this pass by calling again the ProfileVerifierPass. This is what

Hi All, I have a vector n, and for each n[i] I want to extract n[i], n[i+1], n[i+2]..., until the cumulative sum of n[i] and subsequent elements exceeds a CheckValue, whereupon I move to the next index and repeat. I am trying to find a Vectorized approach, and have seen similar posts where filter{stat} and rollmean{zoo} were suggested, but, I haven't been able to figure a way to use them

Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> writes: > I'm curious to know if the LLVM community is deeply split when it > comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please > vote? > > http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq The result of this poll has little value in practice. In the past the project leader stated that the opinions of the most active contributors

Alright, I'm ready to nuke it. Last chance to say stop. For context of others, this has come up repeatedly: no one we know of is using EdgeProfiling.cpp, PathProfiling.cpp, and the lib/Analysis/Profile*Pass.cpp collection of tools. They haven't been updated since 2012 when Alastair Murray looked into this stuff, and both current efforts towards PGO are essentially *totally* different

Description: Fix warning: variable set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]. bugs.debian.org/633756. Related drivers were not tested. Last-Update: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:04:48 +0300 Index: b/drivers/belkinunv.c =================================================================== --- a/drivers/belkinunv.c 2011-05-31 13:36:49.000000000 +0300 +++ b/drivers/belkinunv.c

BTW, this will also remove the entire 'runtime' directory in the LLVM repository. Runtime libraries are now being developed in compiler-rt. That is where the GCDA profiling runtime already lives and any new instrumentation based profiling runtime would also likely live there. If the code in the existing runtime tree is needed to start building those, they can always be found in the VCS

For starters, I hope the results of this poll can help guide how the GettingStarted page is written. http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html I'd imagine the most active contributors do not find themselves referencing this page too often, but as a newcomer, I feel it could use some work. Git is second class, CMake gets nothing but a passing reference, and Ninja is not even mentioned.

Hello R users, My problem is that the data I've got is in the minimum number of columns with each ward (geographic area) appearing multiple times. The first 30 terms look like this > HHum02 CASW Btype Yr CO2Group NumVeh 170597 00CCFA CARS 2002 C 2 170598 00CCFA CARS 2002 D 2 170599 00CCFA CARS 2002 E 22 170600 00CCFA CARS 2002

Hello, Commit 2541626cfb79 breaks GM20B probe with the following kernel log: [ 2.153892] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.153897] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 36 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgf100.c:273 gf100_vmm_valid+0x2c4/0x390 [ 2.153916] Modules linked in: [ 2.153922] CPU: 1 PID: 36 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.1.0+ #1 [ 2.153929] Hardware name: Google

> I'd imagine the most active contributors do not find themselves > referencing this page too often, but as a newcomer, I feel it could > use some work. This has been in the back of my mind for a while, and I think it is probably true. I think that it would be more useful if you did a poll specifically aimed at new contributors (simple rough criterion: new contributor === doesn't

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 12:58 AM Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo at tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote: > > Hello, > > Commit 2541626cfb79 breaks GM20B probe with > the following kernel log: > > [ 2.153892] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 2.153897] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 36 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgf100.c:273 gf100_vmm_valid+0x2c4/0x390 > [

This patch adds support for virtual IOMMU to the vmxnet3 module. We switch to DMA consistent mappings for anything we pass to the device. There were a few places where we already did this, but using pci_blah(); these have been fixed to use dma_blah(), along with all new occurrences where we've replaced kmalloc() and friends. Also fix two small bugs: 1) use after free of rq->buf_info in

This patch adds support for virtual IOMMU to the vmxnet3 module. We switch to DMA consistent mappings for anything we pass to the device. There were a few places where we already did this, but using pci_blah(); these have been fixed to use dma_blah(), along with all new occurrences where we've replaced kmalloc() and friends. Also fix two small bugs: 1) use after free of rq->buf_info in

>> what is in '/usr/bin/dhcpd-update-samba-dns.sh' ? # will receive addresses from this DHCP server. Instructions are found here: # https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samba_4_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#DHCP sleep 5 checkvalues() { [ -z "${2}" ] && echo "Error: argument '${1}' requires a parameter." && exit 1 case ${2} in -*) echo

Hongbin Can you elaborate more on your suggestion? I am not sure I fully understand what you suggested. -Milind On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Milind, > > Maybe you could annotate the default case value as metadata to the swith > instruction. > > Thanks > Hongbin > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM,

Hi Mark, This will workaround the problem of "default" branch restriction on the switch instruction. The trouble with this technique is that it will trump later optimization phases such as constant propagation. When a block was part of a case, because of the knowledge of the case value, the block was a candidate for better optimization. However, when we move the body of the case into

Hi Milind, My suggestion just for your concern that if you eliminate the default block, a block associated with a case value will become the default block of the swhich instruction, since a switch instruction always requires a default block. But when a block associated with a case value become the default block, the associated case value is lost and may confuse the later optimizations such as

Hi Milind, Maybe you could annotate the default case value as metadata to the swith instruction. Thanks Hongbin On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu>wrote: > Hi Mark, > > This will workaround the problem of "default" branch restriction on > the switch instruction. The trouble with this technique is that it > will trump later