similar to: [LLVMdev] [GSoC] flang midterm progress report

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>Hi everyone! > >> > >>Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a

----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi everyone! > > >> > >

On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: > > http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html > > Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! Wow, this is really fantastic

Hi everyone! Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a

On 09/24/13 12:16 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > >> On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone! >>>> >>>> Today is

On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a >> report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in >> July: >>

I'd like to publicly congratulate Alex for his excellent work this summer! He worked diligently throughout the entire period, and he quite-successfully tackled an ambitious project. As a result, we now have a Fortran frontend for LLVM capable of compiling real packages (BLAS, LAPACK, etc.), and correctly executing the test suites for those packages. Thanks to Alex, and to Google, we now have a

Dear Community, As I keep you update with my progress by writing weekly report, this report is covering the information about how we are processing. For those who are interested in these weekly reports, please check [1]. In general, the progress of this project is in working order. Before the midterm, I have done the following works: 1. Finish the SAFECode llvm 3.7 portation. Currently it

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing > List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 12:17:16

Thanks for your support. I wrote my draft GSoC proposal, it can be viewed here - https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 Please read it and tell me what you think. Any criticisms or suggestions are welcome! And I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have about the flang code > base. :-) > I actually do have a small question - could you tell me from what Fortran standard are the

On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers

Dear GSoC Students and Mentors, This is just a reminder about midterm evaluations which start on next week. So, starting from 19:00 UTC July, 11 till 19:00 UTC July, 15 you can submit your midterm evaluation forms. If you will be unable due to some reason to fill the midterm evaluation form, please let me know asap. Thanks! -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and

Dear Community, in an earlier post, students working on LLVM were asked to provide a short report on their GSoC project. in the following I want to give an overview on the current status of my GSoC project and outline my next planned activities. Since my mentoring organization is Julia, I also send this to the according mailing list. *1. Activities so far:* As described in my proposal [1], I

Hi again, I was studying and building the lfort repository as I said I would do, but after a while I decided that I would like to work on flang instead. So, I forked flang and so far I've had pretty good success with it, here's what I've done: - Merged a pull request from a github user Michael Gottesman(He added support for latest llvm and cmake) - Fixed character literal continuation

Hi again. I've though more about the full standard being too ambitious, and now I fully agree with that. So I had a go at choosing the useful subset of Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be viewed at https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 . Focusing on less should also improve my productivity and lead to a better summer of code project by drastically reducing the

Hi Alex, You may want to check the later versions of the standard also to check if some of your proposal is not deprecated there. The most important thing in the Fortran standard is the array support and it is a big task by itself. In my opinion, the I/O part is not the most important thing yet it is an enormous task. Usually, the Fortran routines are used externally in other computation and I/O

Thanks for the responses! > I might be wrong (I'd love to be wrong here!) but I think this is a bit > too ambitious > You might be right about it being too ambitious, it would certainly be wise to aim for less. A more polished, but less broad product is definitely better than a buggy standard compliant one, and I think that it would go better with the general philosophy of GSoC. I

Dear Community, I would like to summarize my work till date for GSoC 2016. Till the current phase of my project, I have mostly focused on developing the necessary infrastructure to use analysis results from Polly in LLVM. Initial plan as mentioned in the proposal: For the first month:- 1. Decouple ScopInfo pass from Polly’s pass chain and provide capability to create SCoP(Static

> > No. I think that you might want to use Clang for inspiration on design, > but you'd certainly not be bound to that. If you'd like to take a much more > start-from-scratch approach, you can also look at the code that Bill put > together: https://github.com/isanbard/flang - If you use that as a base, > we can always merge it with the useful lfort pieces later. Ok,