similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcement: llvm.org changing name servers

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

Thank you! It seems like new changes in .rst files are picked up quickly now. -- Alex On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:33 PM Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > This should all be fixed now. > > Thanks, > Tanya > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

On Jan 26, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree that the list name is redundant and should be dropped, but >>>> the revision number is compact and very useful... >>>> >>>> -Chris >>> >>> If we agreed to perform this change and we found the person who can change >>>

Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the other documentation has been fixed. -Tanya > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > Hi Tanya, >

All, We have some emergency maintenance to do on the server and it will be going offline in the next 10 minutes. I apologize for the short notice regarding this situation. We hope the server will only be down for a short period of time. Thanks, Tanya

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

Hi Tanya and everybody, Ty for your support. I too believe it should not be complicated. But I was not being able to do it. For instance, I tried to run this code below: BB->push_back(&(BB->front())); BB->pop_front(); But it did not work (kinda obvious why). Nor this: BB->push_back(BB->begin()); BB->pop_front(); But also did not work. It seams the same

What, the deadline is tomorrow?!? The deadline for proposals snuck up on me, and I'm sure many of you forgot as well. Therefore, I am extending the deadline. I have received some great talk proposals, so keep them coming. However, I have very few tutorials, BoFs, posters, or lightening talk proposals. So please, get those proposals in and lets make this year the best developer meeting yet!

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 26, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree that the list name is redundant and should be dropped, but >>>>> the revision number is compact and very useful... >>>>> >>>>> -Chris

> I need a way to reorder instructions inside MachineBasicBlocks or > MachineFunctions. > I've been searching for it but I have not found an example in the code yet. For MachineBasicBlocks, check out this doc: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MachineBasicBlock.html I believe its basically the same as basic blocks in that you can manipulate the instruction list. Otherwise, you

Thanks for testing the release. Overall the test results look decent with a couple exceptions. You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version of xcode do you have installed? Can you send me the following files? SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* Thanks, Tanya On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Takanori Ishikawa

In which folder does proc "exp_debug" exist, because I've downloaded (not build and installed this version) the latest version of expect (5.42), but cannot find it? Henrik. ----Original Message Follows---- From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at

> In which folder does proc "exp_debug" exist, because I've downloaded (not > build and installed this version) the latest version of expect (5.42), but > cannot find it? I have no clue. Just install it. -Tanya > > Henrik. > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> > Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing

> I am very much happy to announce that my GSoC 2008 proposal[1] was accepted. > Thank you very much for accepting my proposal. > My mentor is Tanya Lattner. > I would like to know how should I communicate with my mentor( using this > dev-list, #llvm at Oftc.net or by any other means)? The best way is to use llvm-dev. The community may have some comments and suggestions regarding

The LLVM demo page is currently disabled. I will notify the list if/when it gets re-enabled. Thanks, Tanya

Tanya, I have done make check and nightly report tests on LLVM on the GCC 4.2.0 release, on Linux x86 32 bit. On make check the bit intrinsics test is still failing but it works from the command line, strange ? What files do you want from the nightly report, as I am not familiar with it ? I will be doing Cygwin tests next. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M.