Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?"
2013 Jul 12
0
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
Be careful about license issues.
I.e. gpl.
On 07/11/2013 05:00 PM, Chris Matthews wrote:
> I am looking at adding some tests based on John the Ripper to the test
> suite repository.
>
> http://www.openwall.com/john/
>
> Does anyone have a problem with this?
>
> Are there specific algorithms people would like to see benchmarked?
>
> Thx
>
> Chris Matthews
>
2013 Jul 12
1
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
Yes, it looks like the core is all GPL2. But they go on a file-by-file basis.
Chris Matthews
chris.matthews at apple.com
(408) 783-6335
On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
> Be careful about license issues.
>
> I.e. gpl.
>
>
> On 07/11/2013 05:00 PM, Chris Matthews wrote:
>> I am looking at adding some tests based on John the
2013 Jul 12
0
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
Hey thanks. I'd always meant to get that in. :)
Might want to check export restrictions as well.
On Jul 11, 2013 5:03 PM, "Chris Matthews" <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
> I am looking at adding some tests based on John the Ripper to the test
> suite repository.
>
> http://www.openwall.com/john/
>
> Does anyone have a problem with this?
>
> Are
2013 Jul 12
2
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
> Hey thanks. I'd always meant to get that in. :)
>
> Might want to check export restrictions as well.
Right. This was the reason why OpenSSL was removed from the testsuite.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2013 Jul 12
0
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
On 7/12/13 3:31 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>> Hey thanks. I'd always meant to get that in. :)
>>
>> Might want to check export restrictions as well.
> Right. This was the reason why OpenSSL was removed from the testsuite.
Agreed. Please do not add any crypto stuff to the test suite. The
regulations on crypto are unclear and have, in the past, been subject to
2013 Jul 12
1
[LLVMdev] John the Ripper in the test suite?
> Agreed. Please do not add any crypto stuff to the test suite. The
> regulations on crypto are unclear and have, in the past, been subject to
> change. Hosting crypto is a headache that I don't want to deal with.
Do you know if we've got much that's specifically intended as a proxy
for crypto? It's quite an important use-case in the real world.
Tim.
2020 Apr 09
5
CentOS 8 CD Ripper
Hey all,
Does anyone know of a CD ripper that will work with CentOS 8? I've
found a great many that will work CentOS 6 and 7 but nothing that will
build for CentOS 8.
--
_
?v?
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
****
2011 Dec 01
2
Audio CDs not detected by winecfg, and dbpoweramp CD Ripper
Hi !
Audio CDs seem to be invisible to winecfg. I want to use dbpowerramp CD Ripper under Linux using WINE. CD Ripper doesn't see audio CDs, too.
I am using WINE 1.3.33, Ubuntu 11.10 64bit. Ubuntu itself correctly identifies the CD drives, and the Audio CDs. The CD-Rom-Drives are internal ATAPI drives, and external Plextor drives connected via firewire. If I put _data_ CDs into those drives
2003 Sep 26
1
weak password checking for samba 3 ?
I've got a problem with some idiots of my users :=).
They always use weak passwords. Does anyone know
a way to find out which passwords are easy to crack?
I mean usual passwords like god, sex, password, $username, ....
I use tdb as password database.
thank you,
livius
2009 Sep 16
2
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
2009/9/16 Olivier Meurant <meurant.olivier at gmail.com>:
> Average 13836499.46 12447973.17 1388526.29 10.03
> Standard deviation 53189.13 515638.56
> 522400.98 3.77
That was pretty much what I was expecting from the article... numbers.
It doesn't matter who's best, you can't be best in all areas, but
profiling must be
2004 Mar 25
4
CD ripper software
I've been having problems with Audiograbber, it got the track breaks all
wrong on a couple of CDs. I think it re-used the track breaks from the first
CD when reading subsequent CDs.
Does anyone have any recommendations for a good CD ripper? I've also tried
Exact Audio Copy, but didn't get on with it very well.
Phil Hibbs
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
Aston, UK
2004 Sep 10
2
Wanted: Ripper that uses ID3V2 and FLAC
I've been with FLAC since 0.7, and I've loved the FLAC files I've ripped
with grip, converted from FLAC 0.8 to 0.9, and played constantly on my
desktop.
And then I noticed the truncated ID3 tags in my FLAC files. I at first
thought the problem lied in FLAC; I posted to this list, hoping for a
solution. But then I realized my trusty GRIP was the flawed program.
Now re-ripping my
2007 Feb 17
1
ripper
Is there some decision tree method available with R, like ripper, that ends
up producing a list of the rules and can be used for prediction?
Stephen Choularton
02 9999 2226
0413 545 182
--
5:40 PM
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2015 Feb 04
4
Another Fedora decision
On 02/04/2015 02:08 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> 3.) Attacker uses a large graphics card's GPU power, harnessed with
> CUDA or similar, to run millions of bruteforce attempts per second on
> the exfiltrated /etc/shadow, on their computer (not yours).
> 4.) After a few hours, attacker has your password (or at least a
> password that hashes to the same value as your password),
2002 Feb 05
1
Fw: CD Ripper Beta Software: RipTrax
RipTrax has just been modified to include support to OGG output file format
(Ogg Vorbis); including comment fields for pertinent track/album
information. You can download the latest version from this link:
http://web2.airmail.net/jlundy/riptrax.htm
If you are lacking a respectable playback tool for OGG files, try FreeAmp
at:
http://www.freeamp.org/
All feedback is welcome (please go easy on
2009 Sep 16
4
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
Olivier Meurant:
> I have run the john the ripper test.
> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from
> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2
>
> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc.
> I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2
> (seems to be the best on x86-32)
> The makefile
2012 Jul 12
2
bcypt availability
Dear Timo,
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
weakest link in the database security.
So, are you planning on this and if so what sort of timeframe /
version would you expect it to be in beta ?
Nik
2009 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
I have run the john the ripper test.
I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from
http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2
To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc.
I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2
(seems to be the best on x86-32)
The makefile invocation is "gcc -c -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
2009 Mar 11
2
dictionary for crackcheck
Hello All,
Can anyone tell me where i can get a "starter" dictionary for crackcheck? i tried googling this but didn't find anything. tia
2013 Jun 27
7
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
There are a few things we have looked at with LNT runs, so I will share the insights we have had so far. A lot of the problems we have are artificially created by our test protocols instead of the compiler changes themselves. I have been doing a lot of large sample runs of single benchmarks to characterize them better. Some key points:
1) Some benchmarks are bi-modal or multi-modal, single