Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Phabricator down"
2013 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Phabricator down
Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue
has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned...
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately phab has gone down and I currently don't have access to fix
> it up. I'll work on it first thing tomorrow, so ETA for it getting back is
>
2013 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator down
We should be back up - please let me know if anything doesn't work as
expected...
Cheers,
/Manuel
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> Just as a tiny update, Manuel is actively working on it, but a small issue
> has turned into a larger issue... stay tuned...
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Yep, sorry, we ran out of space on the instance's database volume. I'll
update this once we're back up.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Holewinski <
justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following:
>
> [Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering.
> -
2013 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator down
Is Phabricator down again? I'm starting to see the following:
[Rendering Exception] Multiple exceptions during processing and rendering.
- AphrontQueryConnectionException: Attempt to connect to
phabricator at localhost failed with error #1040: Too many connections.
- InvalidArgumentException: Argument 1 passed to
AphrontView::setUser() must be an instance of PhabricatorUser, null
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com
> wrote:
> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up.
>
Yes, restarting it would be very helpful.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jon
>
>
> On 12/10/14 1:59 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
>
>> Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, 18:55 Hubert Tong, <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Just my 2 cents here: we are working on enabling this as a part of
>> bugzilla migration as PRs and issues are very tied inside GitHub. Stay
>> tuned for updates!
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Hi,
I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth -
create diff, create revision, specify title and comments. However, when I
try to submit the diff by clicking "save" button, it takes a lot of time
and eventually times out, failing to submit the patch.
Any help on this?
On Thursday, December 11, 2014, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Another php type problem; can you please try again. Thanks!
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 1:37:32 PM Bruno Cardoso Lopes <
bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm facing the same problem.
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am facing problem while submitting patch on phab. All things go smooth
> -
>
2014 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 2:16:00 AM Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <
>> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the send-email part of phab has yet to come back up.
>>>
2014 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Phab is back up - it's still a little slow (the mysql database we use is
doing some cleanups).
On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 5:07:07 PM suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> And i was thinking something wrong with my proxy configuration :P
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Heya,
>>
>> if you wonder
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Hi Manuel,
Thanks for the help. Still persists for me too. Instead of waiting
indefinitely, now I get this error:
Unhandled Exception ("AphrontDeadlockQueryException")
#1205: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:26 AM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem still persist :(
>
> On 12/11/14, Manuel Klimek
2014 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update
Heya, I'll look into it first thing tomorrow - probably a problem with the
encoding settings.
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 9:17:40 PM Robinson, Paul <
Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
> What I'm seeing is that Phabricator emails double-space *everything*
> (not just the diffs).
>
> --paulr
>
>
>
> *From:* cfe-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
2015 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I
hope they'll answer quickly
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again,
> but I'd be curious what the problem is...
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
Hi folks,
phabricator maintenance is a topic that has been lying dormant for a while
now.
That subsequently creates a non-optimal user experience.
For me personally, given that github provides a secure PR infrastructure,
the additional effort required to keep Phab going is not an investment I'm
personally willing to make. I understand that there are unique selling
points for Phab in its UI
2020 Jun 19
3
Phabricator Maintenance
Just my 2 cents here: we are working on enabling this as a part of
bugzilla migration as PRs and issues are very tied inside GitHub. Stay
tuned for updates!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:45 PM Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> -Chris' outdated email, +Chris' correct email :)
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:01 PM Manuel Klimek <klimek at
2015 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote:
>>
>> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other people had
2020 Jun 23
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:04 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:56 AM Hubert Tong via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Anton
2015 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one
bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other
people had similar problems.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> Thanks for the update it has some nice new features. There is one issue I
> am seeing since the update though. I
2015 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator update
Do you have a bounced email, we can look at for clues?
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, apple addresses still bounce without a reason - the sendgrid folks say this is completely controlled by apple.com <http://apple.com/>'s mail servers - do you have somebody you can ask?
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM Manuel
2020 Jun 23
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:25 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:15 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:33 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:04 PM Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev