similar to: [LLVMdev] Generate code from Clang ast which is dumped in xml

Hi !   I'm quite newbie with LLVM, so when replying please give sufficient information please. :-)   I want to use LLVM in windows, but apparently clang currently does not support linking of C++ classes against microsoft compiler  - due to export symbols mangling.   Subject was discussed on thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/20068 and I've tried to contact

The flags -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use are currently ignored for GCC compatibility. I would like to enable them and give them similar semantics to GCC. These flags are baked pretty deeply into our build environment, so supporting them at the driver level will make our lives a lot simpler. >From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html:

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 20 April 2016 at 13:18, Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung.com> wrote: >> Not when dead store happens in an external DSO where compiler can't detect >> it (same applies for single references). > > Do you mean the ones between the DSO and the instrumented code? >

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nischai Vinesh <nischai.vinesh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have written a custom pass to do some tasks and I want to run this pass on > a source code file along with TSAN instrumentation. > > Steps I followed: > 1. I compiled the code file with -fsanitize=thread and -emit-llvm to get the > byte code of the file > 2. Used

Hi Haifeng > I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried > to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert- > block-profiling", I got > error complaining " undefined reference to > `llvm_start_block_profiling'. > > I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory > but in the

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nischai Vinesh > <nischai.vinesh at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have written a custom pass to do some tasks and I want to run this pass on >> a source code file along with TSAN instrumentation. >> >> Steps I followed:

Hi all, So I just took Sun''s dtrace class this week and one thing that piqued my interest was the instrumenting of a process''s instructions and how to find the original instructions. (I''m looking around at resources for learning SPARC assembly to help me when using mdb for analysis, though I vaguely remember pieces from a grad school compiler theory class about 10 years

Hi, using the current version from the repository on Debug+Asserts mode I was able to generate Clangs AST on Gnu gv, however I noticed the tree provides no annotation to which part each statement it is referring to. For example, when it says binary operator I would like to know to which binary operator is it referring to. Is this possible with clang? I am using the ast-view option from cc1. As

Hi, I previously posted about using 32-bit X86 segmentation to harden SafeStack: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/100346.html That involves lowering the limits of the DS and ES segments that are used for ordinary data accesses while leaving the limit for SS, the stack segment, set to its maximum value. The safe stacks were clustered above the limits of DS and ES. Thus, by

I am very glad this project reached the state where we can start the public code review. Please shoot the patches for review when ready. --kcc On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > CC'ing the mailing list for the CSI project. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, TB Schardl <neboat at mit.edu> wrote: >

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Accidentally sent to uiuc server. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you compare your results

Well. A priori. I'm a dedicated legacy OS person. I cut my teeth on command line DOS and then WIN 3.xx (these days that means WFWG 3.11). I drew the line at WIN9x. Hate that beast with a true passion, but because it is the 800 pound gorilla, I have to find some way to accomodate it in the future. So, here is the rub. Linux is a real PITA. Capital PITA. Unbelievably techie and that is bad.

I've been trying all day to reach their techie folks to ask a couple questions about something I worked all weekend on. Keeps rolling to VM and the receptionist does the same thing. Just was wondering if anyone else was able to reach them today. Brian Greul Texas Shirt Company www.txshirts.com 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)

Hey Mehdi, Thank you for your comments. I've CC'd the CSI mailing list with your comments and put my responses inline. Please let me know any other questions you have. Cheers, TB On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:01 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >

We collected more data to address some of the questions from the reviewers. Note this time we use clang itself as the benchmark. We choose clang because we think it's a typical C++ program and the reviewers here have good knowledge of the code base. What we measure is running time for clang to compile a large preprocessed source file (4.98M lines of .ii file), using different compilation

> On 20 Jul 2016, at 20:02, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > > Some general questions about X-Ray > ------------- > Is there a plan to make a separate mailing list or project around > this? Do you have a list of planned features? Interesting question -- so far we haven't decided yet whether XRay will live as another project. I'm certainly open to

Hello everyone, I have done my reading & research and everything I try is coming to different errors, so I am going to beg & pray someone here can help me with my problem. I appericiate any help in advance! I am running Samba 2.2.11 on a RedHat Linux 7.3 Server, connected to a network of Windows 2000 & XP Machines. I want to configure Samba to be the Domain Controller for my other

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > The "tail" marker has a very specific description in LLVM IR: it says that the caller does not access the callee's stack: > http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call Ah that makes more sense. Thanks for the pointer. > > 2) When I instrument the code using my opt pass, none of the

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Nischai Vinesh <nischai.vinesh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I tried that as well but there are no tsan warnings thrown at run time, even > though there are data race error! > > The steps I followed: > 1. Generate bitcode using 'clang -emit-llvm' command > 2. Using the 'opt -load ..' command, I instrumented the

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Yuanfeng Peng <yuanfeng.jack.peng at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > My name is Yuanfeng Peng, I'm a PhD student at UPenn. I'm sorry to bother > you, but I'm having trouble with gpucc in my project, and I would be really > grateful for your help! > > Currently we're trying to instrument CUDA code using LLVM 3.9, and