similar to: [LLVMdev] Thread-safe cloning

You could probably round trip it through bitcode in memory. I think all of the IR cloning functionality assumes that only one context is being used. Even if the serialization isn't efficient as a clone could be, it should give you very high confidence that everything Just Works. :) On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Clinton <andrew at sidefx.com> wrote: > I have a

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I finally got around to testing this approach (round tripping through bitcode in memory) and it works beautifully - and isn't that much slower than cloning. I have noticed however that the copy process isn't thread-safe. The problem is that in Function, there is lazy initialization code for arguments: void CheckLazyArguments() const { if

Hi all, I am experimenting to run a pass inherited from CallGraphSCCPass. In the pass, I iterate all functions in a SCC. In each iteration, I access all arguments of a function in the following way: Function::arg_iterator PI = fun->arg_begin(), PE = fun->arg_end(); ... I have no trouble with building. However, I am troubled with "segmentation fault" when I run the pass

On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > >> I have a (non-entry) basic block that contains only PHI nodes and an >> unconditional branch (that does not branch to itself). Is it always >> possible to merge this block with it's successor and produce a >> semantically equivalent program? I'm

Here's what I've got so far - it seems to work, aside from the fact that DeleteDeadPHIs is not removing at least one dead PHI in my test program. --------------------- static bool mergeBlockIntoSuccessor(BasicBlock *pred, BasicBlock *succ) { if (succ == pred) return false; if (pred->getFirstNonPHI() != pred->getTerminator()) return false; //

All- I''m using puppet 2.7.14. I''ve reviewed http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/2.7/reference/modules_fundamentals.html but it doesn''t seem to cover what I''m attempting. Consider a module layout like this: $ tree mymodule mymodule |-- Modulefile |-- README |-- manifests | |-- init.pp | |-- special_type | | `-- prereqs.pp | `-- special_type.pp

Dear puppetteers, I am having a philosophical question about parametrized classes. When building modules, one wants to be as flexible as possible, to try to target as many puppet flavors as possible. This is our target: - Foreman users, using foreman as an ENC with smart variables (or potentially any other ENC, but I would say this is the most widespread one). - Pure Puppet''s site.pp

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

Hi I updated my rsync to 2.5.6. Since then, any modules actions don't work anymore. rsync -ravvvn --stats --progress rollis.ch::mymodule ends up in opening tcp connection to rollis.ch port 873 receiving file list ... rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (28 bytes read so far) _exit_cleanup(code=12, file=io.c, line=165): entered rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

I tryied everything: :controller => ''MyModule::Core::Controller'' require ''MyModule/core/controller'' include MyModule::Core But nothing works !!! Question is very simple: How to call a controller that belongs to a Module inside the router.rb file? This cannot be that difficult! Thanks! -Sergio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hello everyone: Right now I am writing spec on modules, which are provided by my colleagues. Some of the modules actually contain action methods. I tried very hard to spec those action methods in modules. But it seems that the rspec does not allow module spec to ''get'' action like controller does. After I saw the documentation, I then used :behaviour_type=>:controller.

Hello everyone, I am trying to set a default custom form builder. I have defined my form builder class in "lib/mymodule/mybuilder.rb" as: module Mymodule class Mybuilder < ActionView::Helpers::FormBuilder ...... end end Then I am trying to use this custom class in application.rb as config.action_view.default_form_builder = Mymodule::Mybuilder. But I get "Uninitialized

So, this has always puzzled me a bit. By convention, init.pp contains one class, named the same as the module. However, what is the convention when the module may have multiple external access points? Say you have a module called ''syslog'' which provides both a client and a server class. I typically have used syslog::server and syslog::client. I''ve ended up using this

Hello. I have an .bc, which defines @foo(%type* arg1, %type* arg2, %type* arg3). Firstly, i do this: runtimeModule = getLazyIRFileModule("runtime.bc", smd, llctx); then this: fooFunction = runtimeModule->getFunction("foo"); myType = runtimeModule->getTypeByName("type"); After that, i'm creating another module: myModule = new Module("My

Hello, I would like to load an Hash in my init.rb plugin file ... than I would like to use this hash in my module ... in my init.rb: @anHash = load From file... in mymodule: module Amodule def myFunction #@anHash .... end end How can I access to my hash in my plugin module function ? thanks for this dummy question ;-) Arnaud

Hi all, I would like to rebuild a kmod.src.rpm package for a specific kernel. When I try to do it, this message appears: Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 error: Failed build dependencies: kernel-xen-devel-i686 = 2.6.18-98.el5 is needed by mymodule-kmod-0.1.5-2.i686 kernel-PAE-devel-i686 = 2.6.18-98.el5 is needed by mymodule-kmod-0.1.5-2.i686. Is

I''ve been looking at bottling some functionality up into a plugin, but I''m having some problems including it. The structure I have is: /app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb: class Admin::BaseController > ApplicationController #snip# end /vendor/plugins/myplugin/lib/my_module.rb: module MyModule def new_func "New Function" end end

Hi, I''m using Puppet 3.2.1 and heavily relying on hiera data bindings. I have the following situation: class software ( $my_content = undef, ) { file { ''/path/to/file'': content => $software::my_content, } } in hieradata/software.yaml (hiera.yaml seems ok): software::my_content: template(''mymodule/myfile.erb'') With this configuration I

I want to be able to have Puppet determine which file to use as the source of a template() call in a manner similar to the source parameter. Basically, I want to have a file resource that will use the most appropriate file for a template. While I can do: file { "file.conf" : source => [ "puppet:///module/file.conf.${hostname}",

Hi everyone! What's the best filesystem to use for the mail spool? I'm debating between Debian with xfs or FreeBSD with zfs. I'm not sure which way to go. I'm migrating from cyrus. I have about 50 users so it's not a large setup. Cheers! Monika -- Monika Janek Systems Administrator, Side Effects Software Toronto, Ontario Canada 416-504-9876 x207 www.sidefx.com