similar to: [LLVMdev] C++ into C code conversion

Dear Mr. Chisnall! thank you for you help V Nedeľa, 26. máj 2013 o 15:33 +0100, David Chisnall napísal(a): > On 26 May 2013, at 14:42, Peter Fodrek-CHELLO <peter.fodrek at chello.sk> wrote: > > > We have same problem that we are to port third party C++ user space code > > into Linux kernel code where is only available to use C source code. > If you want to get your

---------- Preposlaná správa ---------- Predmet: Re: [Samba] Windows server 2003 domain authentication with Samba version 4.7.0-git.23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 Dátum: piatok, 10. novembra 2017, 10:32:48 CET Od: Pre: L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 10:07:22 CET L.P.H. van Belle via samba napísali: > > You could try to add AES256 support

Dear Mr. Cardon! Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba napísali: > > > IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version > > 4.7.0-git. > > 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not > > authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain > > > > in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb

Dear Samba experts, IO would like to ask for help with diagnose why my Samba version 4.7.0-git. 23.4e3f0fb9d15SUSE-oS13.3-x86_64 in openSUSE Tumbleweed can not authentificate me on Windows server 2003 domain in /etc/fstab I have working combination - smb version only vorks if set to 1.0 //192.168.1.131/shares /home/fodrek/shares cifs credentials=/home/fodrek/

Dear LLVM experts! we would like to use BeignetBackend as and LLVM Target It shown in teh Beignet code there is a note "Well, the complete code base is somehow a compiler backend for LLVM. Here, we really speak about the final code generation passes that you may find in `src/backend`." http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/Backend/compiler_backe nd/ But Beignet does not

Na piatok, 10. novembra 2017 10:03:03 CET Rowland Penny via samba napísali: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:51:14 +0100 > > "Peter Fodrek,ml. via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Dear Mr. Cardon! > > Na štvrtok, 9. novembra 2017 18:29:03 CET Denis Cardon via samba > > > > napísali: > > > > IO would like to ask for help with

You might have more luck getting help with a completely self-contained example (no QT in particular) and a complete description of how you built and ran your example. That said, the placement of the call to Rf_endEmbedded looks a little odd. Best, luke On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, And?ol Evain wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a C++ program that calls R using R_tryEval, very similarly to

Hello everyone, I have a C++ program that calls R using R_tryEval, very similarly to what package RInside does. It used to work with R.3.4.3 and R.3.4.4. However, since I updated it to R.3.5.1, R sends an error message: "*Error in < My command > : the base graphics system is not registered*" for any command related to the graphics package. I made a ticket on stackoverflow about

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 08/11/2011 02:56 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Florian, >> >>> we'd like to be able to check for loss of information in trunc operations in >>> our LLVM-based bounded model checker [1]. For this it is important if the >>> trunc was on a signed or unsigned integer,

On 09/30/2011 04:46 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> 3) If the destination type is signed, the value is unchanged if it >>> can be represented in the destination type (and bit-field >>> width); otherwise, the value is implementation-defined. >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> 4.7.3 suggest to me, that the standard does

>> 3) If the destination type is signed, the value is unchanged if it >> can be represented in the destination type (and bit-field >> width); otherwise, the value is implementation-defined. >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> 4.7.3 suggest to me, that the standard does not define a result for >> '(signed char)

On 08/11/2011 02:56 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Florian, > >> we'd like to be able to check for loss of information in trunc operations in >> our LLVM-based bounded model checker [1]. For this it is important if the >> trunc was on a signed or unsigned integer, so we need nsw and nuw flags for >> this. Would you accept a patch that adds these flags to LLVM (and

I'm having a problem statically linking a big c++ application on Centos4. I can make it work on Centos5 and that's great. I just need to figure out a way to reproduce the problem on a small test case. The specific problem is that when I throw an exception, I get a segfault. It only happens on Centos4, and only on ia-32 machines. In an act of desparation I disassembled the bit of code

Hi On 8/03/23 15:27, Rusty Travis wrote: > On 3/7/23 13:12, Paul Murrell wrote: >> Hi >> >> I think the main issue here is that you are *drawing* text on the >> graphics device, so I would only expect to see literal XML text output >> in the result. >> ''' >> >> Hope that helps > > Thank you for your consideration of the

Dear Sir, Very glad to send E-mali to you , Im Annie. I have encountered some problems on the way of learning opus, so I would like to consult you. I found "global_stack" was not released after malloc, and malloc memory was too large.So what I want to ask you is whether "global_stack" malloc can have less memory, since the value "GLOBAL_STACK_SIZE" can be

Dear All,   is there a function in R that would help me convert a covariance matrix built based on arithmetic returns to a covariance matrix from log-returns?   As an example of the means and covariance from arithmetic:   mu <-c(0.094,0.006,1.337,1.046,0.263) sigma

According to https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html#x86 Android always support SSE, so there's no need to test SSE OS support. Why both __ANDROID__ and ANDROID are tested: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15328751/android-macro-suddenly-not-defined http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6374523/how-to-detect-compilation-by-android-ndk-in-a-c-c-file

Hello, Is it possible to execute Objective-C code using LLVM JIT? The original point for my research is this topic on StackOverflow: All selectors unrecognised when invoking Objective-C methods using the LLVM ExecutionEngine http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10375324/all-selectors-unrecognised-when-invoking-objective-c-methods-using-the-llvm-exec

On Oct 11, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Friday 10 October 2008 20:29:49 Michael wrote: >> What command and options should be used to convert C++ to C? > > Try this: > > llvm-gcc -c -O3 -emit-llvm file.cpp -o - | llc -march=c -o - > > It should spray C code to standard out. Bear in mind that if you use features from the C++ library, you are still going

Reid Spencer schrieb: > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:10 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >> Pertti Kellomäki schrieb: >>> Chris Lattner wrote: >>>> Many aspects of the target compiler can leak through. >>> So if one wants to use the LLVM system as a cross compiler, one >>> has to configure llvm-gcc as a cross compiler? Fair enough, I guess. >> I