similar to: [LLVMdev] How to always generate epilogue code?

Hi, On 15.04.2014 23:44, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > Hi, > I am curious - how does clang deal with epilogue-less functions that > result from _Raise_Exception being marked 'noreturn'? > I've also been playing with Kai's patch, and discovered that this tends > to greatly confuse Windows stack unwinder in cases when noreturn call is > at the end of a function, so

Can you clarify what you mean by "real SEH handling"? My company has me looking at this in the hopes that I can make LLVM capable of building windows drivers. If you mean "visual c++ style SEH", I'm fairly sure that isn't necessary for my purposes, but it would be nice. If you mean "something that works at all," then your concern about generalizing LLVM

Hi all, i was using bdrb a while ago and it wasn''t stable enough in version 0.2.1 for doing the job - it loss jobs or did execute only the first one invoked and so on. Now i gave the new version a try and i found a bug at playing around. When i start a worker_method over the normal Unix scheduler bdrb will start as much as possible the worker_method after the :end-time is reached.

Hi, I'd like to submit a patch to match the clang patch on the front end. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140414/103257.html The front end doesn't need this patch to work but it's still important. This is mostly based on work done by kai from redstar.de Could I get some feedback on this? I'm not sure if the emitting of the register names will effect

Michael, In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work around. Do you have suggestions on how to code the following simple examples to not error? Can some of these be fixed in ErrorOr.h? Or am I totally not getting something? -Nick struct Foo { void doit(); };

You need to get the LLVM Sphinx docs using SVN or Git. If you want it, I can do the changes for you since I have already everything in place. -- Mikael 2013/12/3 Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> > Hi Rafael, > > is there a repository with the static pages or should I simply produce a > diff between the 2 versions? > > Regards, > Kai > > On 03.12.2013 14:30,

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > Michael, > > In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and > I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work > around. Do you have suggestions on how to code the following simple > examples to not error? Can some of these be

Hi, I'm noticing an unexpected difference between targets when I hit a dbgtrap in the debugger. Consider this simple llvm function: define void @do_break() { entry: call void @llvm.debugtrap() ret void } If I compile that with llc and use lldb to launch a program that calls it, on x86_64 linux (Ubuntu 18.04), here's what I see at the stop: Process 130404 stopped * thread #1,

LOL - You mean he actually 'met' Newt Gingrich? How dare you not extend him credit!!! I mean seriously... For such a distinguished individual... Hey, not only have I met the heads of several multi-billion dollar corps, I have gotten absolutely blasted drunk with them. So I should get credit, a 40% discount, and your daughters phone number, right??? LOL Seriously, though. I think it

Have searched through the archives but have been unable to find any related issues - hopefully I'm not bringing up an old topic. Am using RW1041 on a Windows NT on a machine with 1Gb of memory. Have a function doit() that reads in a chunk of data using readBin, performs a regression, saves out coeffs and then returns. When using Rgui with the default memory limit of 256Mb I'm able to

On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > Michael, > > In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work around. Do you have

Full_Name: Bill Simpson Version: 65.1 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.250.209) Try this code as separate lines entered interactively, then try doit() doit<-function() { x<-seq(1,10) y1<-x+rnorm(10,1,1.5) y2<-x+rnorm(10,1,1) t.test(x,y1,paired=TRUE) t.test(x,y2,paired=TRUE) } doit() apparently executes only the last of a series of t.test()s. Maybe this is no bug,

On 16 January 2018 at 12:23, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > Do we have to emit directives in the epilogue, too? One of my test case fail > due to the directives in the epilogue have been executed. After removing > them from epilogue, the exception is caught as expected. Emitting directives in the epilogue is hard because the directives apply to all instructions

2018-01-16 21:03 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>: > On 16 January 2018 at 12:23, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > > Do we have to emit directives in the epilogue, too? One of my test case > fail > > due to the directives in the epilogue have been executed. After removing > > them from epilogue, the exception is caught as

>myDF = data.frame(id=c("A10","A20"),d1=c(.3,.3),d2=c(.4,.4),d3=c(-.2,.5),d4=c(-.3,.6),d5=c(.5,-.2),d6=c(.6,-.4),d7=c(-.9,-.5),d8=c(-.8,-.6)) >doit=function(x)c(x[1],sum_LK_positive=sum(x[-1][x[-1]>0]),sum_LK_negative=sum(x[-1][x[-1]<0])) > myDF id d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 1 A10 0.3 0.4 -0.2 -0.3 0.5 0.6 -0.9 -0.8 2 A20 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.2

In the context of calling R from another program (namely gretl, http://gretl.sourceforge.net ) I'm trying to understand the interactions of the R init file (corresponding to the environment variable RPROFILE) and the source() function. I'll illustrate my problem with the following simplified contrast implemented in the bash shell (with R 2.7.1). 1. Works fine: allin at myrtle:~/Rfoo$

Although I owe thanks to Ramus and Ivan, I still do not know how to write and "advanced" function. My most recent try (after looking at the material Ramus and Ivan set) still does not work. I am trying to run the lm function on two different formulae: 1) y~x, 2) y~x+z Any corrections would be appreciated! Thank you, John doit <- function(x){ ds <- deparse(substitute(x))

Hi Rafael, is there a repository with the static pages or should I simply produce a diff between the 2 versions? Regards, Kai On 03.12.2013 14:30, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Can you send a patch? > > On 2 December 2013 06:44, Kai Nacke <kai at redstar.de> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I like to submit some updates to the LLVM website regarding the LDC >> compiler.

Hi all, Prefix: I am a frustrated Java coder in R. I am coding a medium sized ecosystem modelling program in R. I have changed to using S4 objects and it has cost me an order of magnitude in execution speed over the functional model. I cannot afford this penalty and have found that it is the result of all the passing-by-value of objects. I see that you can now safely inherit from

2018-01-16 18:18 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>: > On 15 January 2018 at 12:49, 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > > - CFI directives: > > > > This is for .eh_frame section. Basically all the targets insert CFI > > directives in FrameLowering, but I am not sure exactly when/where I > should > > do