Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 2 Available"
2013 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 2 Available
On May 24, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter.
>
> At this point, we are taking fixes only for *serious* regressions from 3.2. I will be pushing back on all requests to merge
2013 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 2 Available
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter.
>>
>> At this point,
2013 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 1 Sources Available
Hi LLVM-ers!
The 3.3 release candidate 1 sources are now available! You can get them here:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/
Once binaries are available, they will be posted there as well.
Please test out these sources and create bug reports for any problems you encounter (http://llvm.org/bugs/) --- and please CC me on those bug reports.
Share and enjoy!
-bw
Note: There are symlinks
2013 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 1 Sources Available
Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Please test out these sources and create bug reports for any
> problems you encounter (http://llvm.org/bugs/) --- and please CC me
> on those bug reports.
The RC looks good on SystemZ; all projects/test-suite tests pass.
There are still two failing tests in the regression suite:
LLVM :: DebugInfo/namespace.ll
This was already
2013 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] Release Candidate 2 Available
On 25 May 2013 04:59, Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail.com> wrote:
> 4 cd llvm-3.2.src/tools
> 5 tar xvf ../../clang-3.2.src.tar.gz
> 6 mv clang-3.2.src clang
> 7 cd ..
>
You don't need to do any of it, there are already symlinks on the llvm.src
dir to point to all others on the same root. Just unpack each source tar
ball and be happy. ;)
> 8 ./configure
2014 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] [Release 3.5] Release Candidate 2 Binaries Available
On Aug 14, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 02:13 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> I’m sorry for the late announcement.
>>
>> The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please
>> pick them up here and test them out!
>>
>> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/
>
> Can somebody
2014 Aug 12
3
[LLVMdev] [Release 3.5] Release Candidate 2 Binaries Available
I’m sorry for the late announcement.
The binaries for the 3.5 release candidate 2 are now available. Please pick them up here and test them out!
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5/
-bw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140811/c65347b7/attachment.html>
2010 Sep 14
3
[LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.8 Release Candidate 2 Tagging Tonight
Important Announcement
Release testing of Release Candidate 1 is finished. I'll be tagging Release Candidate 2 tonight. If there are any fixes you want in, please get them approved as soon as possible.
After this tag, the only patches that will be accepted will be those that fix regressions from 2.7
-bw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2013 Dec 04
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4rc2 Binaries Now Available
The LLVM 3.4rc2 binaries are now available for testing! Please download them and compile and test things. See if it breaks your code! Please file bugs for any issues you encounter. At this point, we’re only accepting fixes for regressions from 3.3.
Share and enjoy!
-bw
2013 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi LLVM-ites!
We are doing a quick test of 3.3rc3. Our testers did a quick turn around and created binaries which you can test. Please give them a go and let us know how they work for you. They are here:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3
We don't have a lot of time remaining in the release cycle, so please do whatever you can to make sure they are solid. In particular, make sure that
2013 Apr 01
8
[LLVMdev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
Happy April!
[Contrary to the day, this is not an April Fool's joke. ;-)]
It has been several months since the release of Clang 3.2. Now is the time to start thinking about the next release! The (very) tentative schedule is testing in May and a release in June.
What This Means For You
Now is the time to start thinking about which features you are currently working on and getting them
2013 Jun 06
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
It's probably PR12517.
Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
$ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
RPATH
$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand.
Maybe we should merge r182559
2013 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> It's probably PR12517.
>
> Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
>
> $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
> RPATH
>
2013 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
I'm not sure I follow. Will the final binaries have a bad RPATH or not? A
1sec startup pause on some (admittedly crazy) systems seems like a big deal
to me.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > It's probably PR12517.
> >
> >
2014 Aug 21
6
[LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available
The third 3.5 release candidate is now available. Please pick up sources and binaries here:
https://llvm.org/pre-release/3.5
Run it through its phases and report any bugs you find!
Share and enjoy!
-bw
2013 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi Bill,
I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup
performance of your binaries is much worse than the stable binaries
for 3.2
I've used:
http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/clang+llvm-3.2-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-12.04.tar.gz
vs
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3/clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64.tar.gz
On a simple hello.c file:
/ssd/bench$ TIMEFORMAT="%E"
2013 Apr 29
5
[LLVMdev] [Announcement] Call For 3.3 Testers!
Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!!
What's Expected
---------------
You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask yourself no more! Not only do I have the answers for you, but talking to yourself will cause people to avoid you.
Here's
2016 Aug 26
3
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 3 source and binaries available
We're very very close to the final release. Source and binaries for
LLVM-3.9.0-rc3 are available at
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.9.0/#rc3
This release candidate is almost the same as rc2, with the following
additional commits:
r279224 - Minor change to OpenCL release notes
r279260 - [lld] Add a note that 3.9 is a major milestone for us
r279468, r279474 - Fix gather-root.ll SLP vectorizer
2014 Aug 28
5
[LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 4 Now Available
We had to roll a release candidate 4 for the 3.5 release. It’s up at the normal place:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.5
Please test it and report any major bugs you may find.
Thanks!
-bw
2012 May 09
1
[LLVMdev] 3.1 Release Candidate 3 Available for Testing
Hi all,
The testers started testing 3.1rc3. You can find binaries at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.1/rc3/. Please file bugs and report any issues to me. Thanks!
-bw