similar to: [LLVMdev] clobbering callee-save registers

Hi, Apologies this is a bit lengthy. TLDR: I'm using Dragonegg + LLVM 3.2 and uClibc, and am finding that using the Fast register allocator (i.e. -optimize-regalloc=0) causes miscompilation of setsockopt calls (5-arg system calls). The problem doesn't happen with the default register allocation path selected. It can be worked around by manually simplifying the system call setup

Hi, I’m facing a crash issue (--target=arm-linux-gnueabi -march=armv8-a+crc -mfloat-abi=hard) and debugging the problem, I found that an intended branch was not taken due to bad code generation after the Post RA Scheduler pass. A CMPri instruction after an INLINEASM block (which inturn contains a cmp, bne instruction) is being moved before the INLINEASM block incorrectly resulting in two

On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Hi, > I’ am trying to insert an InlineAsm Instruction in my pass, which > FunctionType do I need for Inlineasm? > If I understand it right, I need a call instruction to insert the > new produced InlineAsm? > > Thanks for help Inline asm works like a "callee". So for: call void asm sideeffect

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

One more interesting thing I have noticed is as following : In sqlite3 code consider 3 functions namely sqlite3Update, sqlite3Select and sqlite3Where begin sqlite3WhereBegin is called by both functions sqlite3Update and sqlite3Select but according to CallGraphSCC sqlite3Update is codegen before in that case during RegMask propagation phase default regmask is used for call site of

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically > how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. > So far it has worked well for inputs, but not for outputs. The inline > asm support in this language (which is D, LLVMDC[1]) is

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen > <tomas.l.olsen at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically >> how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. >> So far it has

Hi all, I'm having some trouble with inline asm expressions, more specifically how to create the right FunctionType for a given constraint set. So far it has worked well for inputs, but not for outputs. The inline asm support in this language (which is D, LLVMDC[1]) is through asm *statements*. I never have inline asm *expressions*, and outputs are always via memory. I D my test looks like

Hi, I' am trying to insert an InlineAsm Instruction in my pass, which FunctionType do I need for Inlineasm? If I understand it right, I need a call instruction to insert the new produced InlineAsm? Thanks for help, Michael for (BasicBlock::iterator bi = i->begin(), be = i->end(); bi != be; ++bi){ std::vector<const Type*> asm_arguments;

Hi (Duncan?), The other day I noticed some characters will cause errors in R CMD CHECK because of parse_Rd(), and AFAIK, these chars include '%', '{' and '}'. For example, note the comments in the example section: %~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~% \name{testfun} \Rdversion{1.1} \alias{testfun} \title{ A Test } \description{ A test } \usage{ testfun() } \value{ NULL }

Hi, I vaguely remember hitting something like this when I was implementing MSA. IIRC, there was an optimization (in DAGCombine or somewhere around there) that was folding CopyToReg instructions into the load without checking whether the new register class was acceptable. I remember adding a target hook to limit this optimization based on the EVT's involved but I'm not sure if that's

Dear All, I have three classes of questions about generating random numbers with different packages (windows xp 32bit R). . 1. Suppose I would like to use package *foreach*, can I use current Sys.time as a seed? Although I can get the time up to1e-6 second precesion, the code below dose not work well on a local machine with two cores. ################# library(foreach) library(snow)

Hi, I am seeing a case, in a private port, of an inline asm with indirect memory references being allocated invalid registers (i.e. registers that cannot be used on loads). For example, the inline asm constraint is correct: call void asm sideeffect "MOV $$r0, $0\0AMOV $$r0, $1\0A", "*m,*m,~{r0}"(i16* @a, i16* %b) #1, !srcloc !1 but then $0 and $1 are allocated to registers

All, I am not understanding the scoping used in foreach when it is used inside a function. I keep getting "could not find function" errors for functions that are in memory when I try to use foreach within a function call. I have a simple example below. "testFun" is in memory and works when called by foreach directly, but when I place foreach in a function called

Dear R users, I am running R-2.15.1 in Linux Slackware64-14.0. Here is my minimal working example: testfun <- function (x) { a <- 0; sapply(X="a", FUN=get, envir=sys.frame(which=x)); } Inside R, that is R called from within a Linux terminal, the following code works: testfun(x=5) print(testfun(x=6)) But within rkward the above code fails and the following works: testfun(x=1)

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Holger Hoefling wrote: > Hi Luke, > > Ah - I see - thank you! This at least points me to a way on how to > "fix" this. I tried setting the srcref attribute to NULL, but the hash > value is still different and so is the serialization. So this looks > like it is one difference, but not all of them when source attributes are attached they are

Hello Mentors, I am currently finding bug in Local Function related optimization due to which runtime failures are observed in some test cases, as those test cases are containing very large function with recursion and object oriented code so I am not able to find a pattern which is causing failure. So I tried following simple case to understand expected behavior from this optimization. Consider

Hi Luke, Ah - I see - thank you! This at least points me to a way on how to "fix" this. I tried setting the srcref attribute to NULL, but the hash value is still different and so is the serialization. So this looks like it is one difference, but not all of them Even if all differences were identified - it still leaves me with different behavior between interactive and batch-mode,

Add attributes(testfun) and you will see where the two functions differ. luke On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Holger Hoefling wrote: > Hi, > > I posted this question to the regular help list, but it seems to be > this is probably a question that is better addressed on r-devel. Sorry > for the double posting. > > I am using hash-values to cache certain results in R. This caching >

Hi I'm working on the XCore target and am having difficulty building libgcc. Background: If I use a libgcc built by llvm3.0-gcc with my current clang-llvm3.3 compiler, exceptions 'seem' to work. Trying to rebuild libgcc however breaks exception handling - they aren't caught! I thus assumed I needed to focus on the unwind code and particularly functions that call