similar to: [LLVMdev] [polly] add check-polly to check-all target for configure+make

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On 05/31/2013 01:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:59:52AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>> On 05/31/2013 10:11 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > >>>> Sebastian Pop wrote: > >>>>>

On 06/05/2013 06:24 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 05/31/2013 01:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:59:52AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 05/31/2013 10:11 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:

Strange , with --enable-shared (I use auto tool by the way ...) it gives: MacBook-Pro-di-Marcello:examples Kariddi$ ./compile_ex.sh not_so_simple_loop clang (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument '-enable-polly-viewer'. Try: 'clang (LLVM option parsing) -help' clang (LLVM option parsing): Did you mean '-enable-polly-vector'? Seems like it doesn't

On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > ... >> Does attached patch work for you? >> >> Tobi >> > > Tobi, > Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' > without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Thanks for

I was trying the new feature you introduce about printing out the graphs, so I updated my version of llvm/clang/polly synchronizing them to the last version, but I get this error launching clang (also , I recently switched to MacOS X for development): $ clang not_so_simple_loop.c -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang ${PATH_TO_POLLY_LIB}/LLVMPolly.dylib -mllvm -enable-polly-viewer -mllvm -enable-iv-rewrite

Tobi, What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated in 3.3? Jack

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: ... > Does attached patch work for you? > > Tobi > Tobi, Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? Failing Tests (5):

Hi Sebastian, thanks for your reply! At 2013-09-27 03:33:04,"Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:>Hi, > >Star Tan wrote: >> At 2013-09-03 00:12:56,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>  >> >On 09/02/2013 07:44 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> At 2013-09-02 16:22:28,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at

Hi, I'd like to ask another thing about Polly and SCoP discarding. I've noticed that Polly discards quite simple loops like: for (int i = 1; i < 1000; i++) {} or for (int i= 0; i < 1000; i+=2) {} is this an intended behavior or there is some way to make it accept these kind of loops ? Thanks, Marcello 2011/10/3 Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com>: > Hi Tobias,

On 10/22/2011 08:41 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > I was trying the new feature you introduce about printing out the > graphs, so I updated my version of llvm/clang/polly synchronizing them > to the last version, but I get this error launching clang (also , I > recently switched to MacOS X for development): > > $ clang not_so_simple_loop.c -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang >

Hi Tobias, thanks for the answer. I'll try to give a look to the code you pointed me to , and I'll try to make the modification myself. I'm new to LLVM and Polly, but the code of both seem clean and understandable, so I hope to be able to do it myself. In case I'll ask here for support :) Marcello 2011/10/1 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>: > On 10/01/2011 03:26

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> ... >>> Does attached patch work for you? >>> >>> Tobi >>> >> >> Tobi, >> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make

On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

Hi Rick, Tobi, now that we have a way to link polly statically into the tools, we can turn on the windows polly build-bot. Let's speak about the config that the bot will run: ISL only (no CLooG), imath as a replacement for GMP, and cmake to configure llvm. The compiler will be MSVC 2013: we have verified that the current ISL version with the two patches that I sent out for ISL are compiling

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:23:59AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Tobi, > What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing > polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated > in 3.3? > Jack Tobi, Is it even possible to build polly without cloog at the moment or is the presence of the -polly-codegen-isl

Hello everyone, I'm trying to use LLVM+Polly to obtain a polyhedral representation of some loops to use later for passes I want to implement, but seems like Polly will stop when reaching any statement that has non-affine access functions of the loop bounds discarding the whole SCoP entirely. What I would like to achieve is still getting some information for the statements that , instead,

On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> ... >>>> Does attached patch work for you? >>>> >>>> Tobi >>>> >>> >>> Tobi,

On 11/14/2011 02:45 PM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > 2011/11/14 Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>: >> On 11/14/2011 01:24 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tobias. >>> >>> I worked on enabling Polly accepting non affine memory accesses and I >>> produced a patch. >> >> Great. >> >>> I saw that there were

Hi Tobi, Rick is trying to set up a public buildbot for Polly on Windows. Right now the community version of polly does not build on Windows. We would like to make it possible to link polly statically to avoid several problems dealing with building polly as a DLL. I have a set of changes that make polly link statically in opt, clang, bugpoint, etc. These changes drop support for building

Hi, all I tried Polly installation on Ubuntu. On its building, it returned no errors. But when I run "make polly-test", it returns 11 unexpected failures as follows. ----------------------------------- ******************** Testing Time: 19.77s ******************** Failing Tests (11): Polly :: CodeGen/do_pluto_matmult.ll Polly :: CodeGen/loop_with_condition.ll Polly ::